Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So as I stated, I posted my letter off but over 2 weeks later I've had a visit from one of their reps. I didn't indulge him in any conversation, and I just stated that any such debts are statute-barred and closed the door on him. I was hoping they'd take notice of the letter. Where do I go from here? Thanks
    • I apologise if I was being unclear. Where it currently stands is that they will have it repair, placing scaffolding in our garden for 5 days. They have moved fast, but we will still have to postpone our contractors, meaning, we won't necessarily have the work done in time for the wedding and therefore will incur additional expenses for either a marquee or a wedding venue. They are vehemently against having any kind of liability in any regard but continue repeating that they are legally entitled to use our garden for their repairs (I believe this is true unless the work can be carried out using a cherry picker). The neighbour seems either indifferent or oblivious to the fact they can't reach all of the side of the roof from the space where they can place the scaffolding. They have asked their roofer of choice about using a cherry picker but the roofer has said it wasn't possible. It's not clear whether the roofer doesn't want to use a cherry picker or whether there is an issue with it. They have told us it is a problem that we are installing a gazebo as it will prevent them to access their roof from our garden in the future?!?  
    • Couldn't agree more, really wanted a true ruling on this just for the knowledge but pretty sure the Judge made some decisions today that he didn't need to?.. maybe they all go this way on the day? We hear back so few post court dates I'm not sure. Each Judge has some level of discretion. Their sol was another Junior not even working at their Firm, so couldn't speak directly for them! that was fortunate I think because if she would have rejected in court better, she might have  been able to force ruling, we are at that point!, everybody there!!, Judge basically said openly that he can see everything for Judgement!!!  but she just said "I can speak to the claimant and find out!" - creating the opportunity for me to accept. I really think the Judge did me a favor today by saying it without saying it. Knowing the rep for the sol couldn't really speak to the idea in the moment. Been to court twice in a fortnight, on both occasions heard 4 times with others and both of my claims, the clerk mention to one or both parties "Letting the Judge know if you want to have a quick chat with each other"! So, it appears there's an expectation of the court that there is one last attempt at settling before going through the door. So, not a Sol tactic, just Court process!. Judge was not happy we hadn't tried to settle outside! We couldn't because she went to the loo and the Judge called us in 10 minutes early! - another reason to stand down to allow that conv to happen. Stars aligned there for me I think. But yeh, if the sol themselves, or someone who can make decisions on the case were in court, I would have received a Judgement against today I think. She was an 'advocate'.. if I recall her intro to me correctly.. So verbal arguments can throw spanners in Court because Plinks dogs outsource their work and send a Junior advocate.
    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

accused of theft and facing disciplianary


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3784 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been suspended from work under allegations of theft although I haven't actually been seen doing anything wrong. I was lured to my work place under false pretences . I was telephoned my manager asking if I could come and do him a “huge favour” as he couldn’t locate vital information for the internal audit “because you’re a star and you will find everything much quicker”. When I got there I was called into the office alone, with 3 men, the door was closed behind me. I was then told by The operation manager that he needed to ask me a few questions regarding missing appliances. As I thought I would be finding paperwork not being interrogated I found this a very uncomfortable situation to be put in and being a lone female in a closed room with 3 men found this scenario to be highly intimidating and confrontational. At no point was I given the opportunity to have someone accompany me (an un-biased 3rd party) and felt the way this was conducted was extremely one sided. During the meeting I asked my manager why he had lied about his reasons for me attending the depot to which he replied “Well we couldn’t tell you the real reason we wanted you here, Could we?” This statement leads me to believe that he intentionally set out to deceive me. During the ‘meeting’ I was told by the operations manager that I was not being accused of anything but he wished to eliminate me from enquiries. I was then subsequently suspended on full pay with no guidelines given to me as to what this would entail on the day leaving me in a state of stress, confusion and panic as I had no idea of what the future proceedings would be. The operations manager made a statement to me at the close of the ‘meeting’, “If I was you I would be expecting the police at your door” which I feel was a threatening statement and bared no relevance to what he was attempting to achieve, nor do I believe it was his place to make this known. His statement left me on edge and seriously concerned about the impact this ‘visit’ would have on my young children. I also believe this statement contradicted the previous one made about me not being accused. Surely If I was not being accused the police would not be coming to my home. This comment was unsurprisingly left out of the notes written.

A few days later I received a letter outlining my suspension on the grounds of ‘alleged theft of company property and associated loss of trust and confidence’ which I believe to be again, a complete contradiction of the operations manager previous statement that I was not being ‘accused’. I later received a letter regarding this disciplinary hearing . In this letter I was also told that a fellow employee or trade union member could accompany me to the hearing. However in the previous letter I was told I was to have no contact with fellow employees accept my partner. As my partner is not independent from this matter I do not feel it should be him who accompanies me. As I am not part of a trade union and have never been given any instruction on how to join one, I am sure you can see this leaves me with no option other than to attend on my own, which given past experiences leaves me feeling unnerved. In the disciplinary hearing letter I was given copy of notes taken during the unscheduled ‘meeting’. Aside from a fair proportion of the notes regarding what I have said being incorrect, there are also statements missing that other people in the room made. I was at no point told notes were being taken and would be used as evidence for the hearing or forwarded to the police, which as far as I am aware is illegal without my consent or without me signing the notes to confirm their accuracy. Although it states in the company handbook that notes can be taken during an investigation and used during disciplinary, I was at no point told this was an investigation against me and therefore dispute the legitimacy of these notes.

I have been isolated from my only friends (who are my colleagues), I have been left feeling worthless through no fault of my own. I have been suffering from panic attacks, loss of sleep and various illnesses which I believe to be stress induced. As an apparently ‘valued’ member of staff for over a year, who left to manage the outbase and nominated for employee of the month twice, I have been treated like a low life with no worth and have been made to feel like the most un-trusted, undesirable person ever known. Do you think I have any grounds for a case against them for the way I have been treated?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, I am sorry this is making you so stressed. However suspending on pay and asking you investigatory questions is all quite legal.

 

Have you been to see your GP for support?

 

Do you have any reason at all to think they may have evidence against you?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right.

 

This is very stressful but you have the support of your husband whom I understand works at the same place as you. Please make an appointment with your doctor regarding stress and anxiety and record the fact that you have been accused of gross misconduct and outline the impact it is having on you. Presumably the doctor will prescribe medication to you for stress/ depression/ anxiety caused by this and record a brief outline as to why these were prescribed. Your GP may even decide that in their opinion you are not well enough to attend a disciplinary hearing at this time. That would be a result as it gives you some more time. You would need to submit any sick note to your employer. This will be useful later for a variety of reasons.

 

Do not mention any personal info or info that can identify where you work.

 

I'm going to ask some questions in list format and you answer them all that way. It makes it easier to track back for others later on.

 

I'm assuming you are innocent- is that correct?

 

You said:

allegations of theft although I haven't actually been seen doing anything wrong.
. What do you mean by that?

 

Your job seems to be related mainly to paperwork, what is your job and responsibilities? Do you come into contact with appliances and what are these.?

 

What were you accused of and why do they assume it was you?

 

Do you think it might be someone else?

 

When did this alleged incident of theft take place?

 

When did this meeting take place?

 

When this "meeting" happened, what positions did the other 2 men hold within your work? Are they witnesses to the allegation of theft or were they just there as witnesses on behalf of the boss? Did they ask any questions and if so, what? (NB they can be brought as witnesses to the disciplinary hearing to clarify the issue about your boss's comments re the police coming to your door and any other inaccuracies in the so called report of the meeting. That way, things can be clarified and corrected. If this went to arbitration/ etc, it is similar to court, so statements need to be accurate.)

 

What is the date of the disciplinary hearing? Are you fit to attend that?

 

What does the letter asking you to the disciplinary hearing actually say- briefly outline main points?

 

What documents are with that letter?

 

What proof do they have, do they have witnesses, why do they think it is you? You need to think clearly about why you are being accused of this.

 

Who is conducting the disciplinary hearing?

 

Have they given you written statements from other employees regarding the theft?

 

Have you identified someone who is competent that can accompany you to the hearing, bearing in mind your husband is out of the equation for a variety of reasons? Employees have a statutory right to be accompanied by a fellow colleague or trade union official when they are required to attend disciplinary meetings. You are not in a union so you need to decide who it is going to be. Do not attend on your own, for a whole variety of reasons but mainly, to be someone friendly in your company during a stressful process and to take note. They can prompt you to raise certain issues which you will have prepared in advance. You can take a friend. You would write to your employer advising them of this.

 

You have a copy of their disciplinary policy, is that correct?. In your opinion, have they followed it? If not, why not?

 

Is this a big or small business?

 

This is a brief summation of the process

 

If your employer thinks you are guilty of gross misconduct they must be able to prove that:

 

the decision to dismiss you was one that a reasonable employer would have made (this is really about probability and not like being proven guilty in a court, unfortunately); and

was fair and reasonable in the circumstances; and

that the offence was so grave that dismissal was an appropriate sanction. (this is the case with you, given their allegations)

 

To establish these elements, your employer should:

 

Tell you that they suspect you of gross misconduct and that you face the sack if the case against you is proved.

And undertake a thorough investigation to establish the facts. This is required under the Acas code of practice, which all employers must follow when dealing with gross misconduct. (A link is given below)

 

(Note: Your employer may suspend you with full pay while they establish the facts, but must make it clear that this suspension is not a disciplinary action and does not involve any pre-judgment on its part).

 

Offer you a face-to-face meeting to put your case and hear the evidence against you before deciding whether to take action.

 

They should ensure that you are given reasonable time to prepare for this meeting.

Allow you to bring a friend or colleague to the meeting.

If your employer decides that the case is made out against you and decides to dismiss you, they must set out in writing:

 

the alleged misconduct which has led to the dismissal;

provide you with the reasons for thinking at the time of the dismissal that you were guilty of the alleged misconduct; and

your right of appeal against dismissal.

 

A copy of this written statement must be sent to you.

 

You can appeal within the timescale. That is a legal right.

 

Nothing they have done is illegal however. We might find something they have done that can assist you.

 

A couple of the site admin are real experts on this, with great success. Some of the other regular posters are likewise expert.

 

Please note this site, it has all the info you need. Your husband can help you go through it. http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1339

 

Before you do all this, run a hot bath, put on some relaxing music and take some me time. Then start working on the above issues and start thinking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm assuming you are innocent- is that correct? Yes I am innocent

 

You said: . What do you mean by that? some items went missing from drivers vans and they happened to stop near my address. on one occasion i was not there and the driver was returning a borrowed item to my partner. The other occasion a separate set of drivers were near my adress to see another driver who lives opposite me which they have all confirmed.

 

Your job seems to be related mainly to paperwork, what is your job and responsibilities? Do you come into contact with appliances and what are these.? Yes i do come into contact with them but not in any situation where i could steal them.

 

What were you accused of and why do they assume it was you? i am not too sure of what i am accused of they haven't actually said online outlined on the grounds stated in the letter which i mentioned above. i am assuming the company think these items have been taken to my home?

 

Do you think it might be someone else? it could have been anyone there are 23+ vehicles these items could have gone on to and not recorded correctly by staff which vehicle. I t could well have been any driver but certainly had nothing to do with me.

 

When did this alleged incident of theft take place? on two separate occasion, 2 separate crews/vehicles around 3 weeks apart.

 

When did this meeting take place? approx 2 weeks ago

 

When this "meeting" happened, what positions did the other 2 men hold within your work? Are they witnesses to the allegation of theft or were they just there as witnesses on behalf of the boss? Did they ask any questions and if so, what? (NB they can be brought as witnesses to the disciplinary hearing to clarify the issue about your boss's comments re the police coming to your door and any other inaccuracies in the so called report of the meeting. That way, things can be clarified and corrected. If this went to arbitration/ etc, it is similar to court, so statements need to be accurate.) they asked lots of questions eg whether i knew of any thefts, my relationships with the drivers etc. one was my manager, his manager who asked the questions and an auditor who it now seems took the poor notes.

 

What is the date of the disciplinary hearing? Are you fit to attend that? it is tomorrow i think i am for also i could very easily stress and deteriorate i am not in a great place at the moment.

What does the letter asking you to the disciplinary hearing actually say- briefly outline main points? it outlines no points only that it is alleged theft and loss of trust. it contained the minutes that were not accurate.

 

What documents are with that letter? as above

 

What proof do they have, do they have witnesses, why do they think it is you? You need to think clearly about why you are being accused of this. no witnesses only a tracker report from two vehicles in the vicinity of my address (a housing estate) and for not very long by all accounts.

 

Who is conducting the disciplinary hearing? one of the big head office bosses.

 

Have they given you written statements from other employees regarding the theft? no, they interviewed 4 drivers me and my partner i only have my notes.

 

Have you identified someone who is competent that can accompany you to the hearing, bearing in mind your husband is out of the equation for a variety of reasons? Employees have a statutory right to be accompanied by a fellow colleague or trade union official when they are required to attend disciplinary meetings. You are not in a union so you need to decide who it is going to be. Do not attend on your own, for a whole variety of reasons but mainly, to be someone friendly in your company during a stressful process and to take note. They can prompt you to raise certain issues which you will have prepared in advance. You can take a friend. You would write to your employer advising them of this. No i do not i think i will go it alone i am determined to see this through.

 

You have a copy of their disciplinary policy, is that correct?. In your opinion, have they followed it? If not, why not? yes i do. no i do not believe they have they followed it they took notes when i was not told it was a investigation which is the only situation in which they can do so.

Is this a big or small business? a big business.

 

I will be going to the doctors tomorrow due to the health impact on me. i have never been in trouble and am a very honest law abiding person ho really thought she was doing a good job building a life and career for myself - how foolish i have been.

 

Thanks for all your advise i really appreciate it :)

Edited by emsiem
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would seriously advise you not to go it alone. Apart from what Kenny already said about prompting you, they may pick up on things said in the meeting. It can be difficult to remember everything that's been said so good to have someone there on your side tha you can speak to about it later and jot some notes.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To add to what Caro has, said, do not under any circumstances go alone. This is vital. They can be a shoulder for you, prompt you and take notes.

 

Tonight you need to itemise a full list of all points you need to get across

 

You are entitled to question the validity of the statements, make sure you do.

 

You should call the other 2 people as witnesses and the person that dropped something of at home. You can ask them questions.

 

You should have been given the opportunity to call witnesses.

 

Is there CCTV coverage of the vans, ask to see that of the dates stuff went missing.

 

If you are going to to the doctor, what about the hearing?

 

On the dates stuff went missing what were you doing. Check your computer, for emails, your mobile for calls and texts to help you remember

Link to post
Share on other sites

I note you are still on line but have not replied. Perhaps you are busy on the case. Keep calm.

 

 

 

I missed the blooming obvious-------- the van drivers. OK there is a tracking system, but where are their statements and why have you not got them?

 

Have these van drivers been interviewed, if not why not? They are a key part of the case and can be called in your defence.

 

Additionally, ask for full details of each days tracking records for the vans that were involved in items going missing. There might be something in that that gives a clue.

 

Has stuff gone missing before? I would not be surprised if it had as it's a large organisation. What happened on those occasions and were the same van drivers involved? Is there a pattern?

 

Look for evidential stuff that builds a pattern and add these kind of questions to your list for the meeting.

 

They will have a list of questions prepared for this. If your answer goes one way, they are prepared for that and have another question prepared, missing on out. So, you need to be aware of that and act accordingly. You are given the opportunity to state your case.

 

This is best done by having an itemised statement like we discussed before.

 

Do you have any questions to ask us?

 

Best of luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...