Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
    • IMG_2820-IMG_2820-merged.pdfmerged.pdf Case management was this morning. Here is the Sheriff’s order. Moved case forward to 24/05.   He said there was no signed agreement and after a bit of “erm, erm, yeah but, erm” when he asked them, he allowed time for sol to contact claimant.  what is the next step now? thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What Happened Here Then (Orange PCS/Lowell)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3768 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dont post here often but I do browse a bit so have an idea on how to confront issues as they occur.

 

A bit of background:

 

I was an Orange customer for many years (10+) and had been on contract for most of that.

However, I knew I was going to be leaving the UK for a while so bought a cheap £10 pre-pay phone

and converted by contract number to pre-pay a few months before leaving the UK.

As far as I was concerned everything was in order, and all our bills were paid up and cleared before we left.

 

Coming back to the UK:

 

We spent a couple of years living and working in a non-EU country but came back to the UK in order to start a family

and re-establish a dormant business I used to own and run.

 

On coming back to the UK I suddenly got deluged with all manner of letters from search companies, DCAs,

even the DVLA for money they thought I owed them.

To be fair, I did bump a sizable overdraft on Natwest but dont hear from them too often.

 

The one that was really bothering me was Lowell Portfolio I who insisted I owed them £110+ for an outstanding account with Orange PCS.

Several letters passed between us and they insisted on calling and texting me threatening to make me pay.

 

I got a bit fed up with them so one day I retaliated with this letter:

 

Sir or Madam,

 

I note with some disappointment that you have failed to adequately address points I raised in a previous correspondence.

In fact, reading your letter dated 25th October it appears you have no evidence that there is in fact any debt owed at all.

 

With this fact in mind I propose you should follow one of the courses of action listed below:

 

1, Admit you have no proof of any debt owed and therefore confirm in writing that no further action will be taken.

I will expect all details added to my credit files to be removed and written confirmation given.

 

2, Actually supply all the relevant information in regard to this debt as I am not satisfied I owe any money.

Having read lots of information on the website operated by Equifax, they suggest that a company pursuing a debt

should supply information as requested in order to support their claim.

They do state that they will remove information laid by a company if it fails to provide reasonable information on request

and I will pursue this option if you fail to provide the information by return of post.

 

3, Start litigation.

I note in your last letter that you claim costs will increase if this happens.

However, even if you were to obtain a judgement on your favour,

by failing to fulfil my reasonable requests in good time to prove there is a debt owed,

you would not be awarded any costs at all,

you would only be awarded the amount claimed and only if you could provide clear evidence of a debt being owed.

 

In your most recent letter dated 25th November you threaten to send a doorstep collector to attempt collection.

Take this as notice that any implied rights of access to any of the properties I am party to are hereby revoked.

Therefore any attempt by an agent of yours or anybody contracted by you will be deemed to be trespassing

and will be told to leave immediately.

Failure to leave will result in a report being made to the Police with a request that they remove the visitor

and charge them with trespass.

A copy of this letter revoking your rights of access and the Proof of Delivery receipt will be available for their records. F

urther, a charge of £100 will become payable if a doorstep collector attempts to call at any time.

It will be deemed that you accept this charge if you send a collector (either your own or a contracted party)

and the payment will be payable within 14 days. Failure to pay WILL result in litigation.

 

Contacting me.

Do not contact me by any methods other than written correspondence delivered through the postal system.

For every SMS you send me there will be a charge of £10 payable within 14 days.

There will also be a charge of £10 made for every telephone call attempted and a further £10 charge will apply if I answer the call.

By telephoning me or sending me SMS messages you will be deemed to accept these charges.

If you do not wish to incur these costs then do not contact me this way.

 

Any telephone calls you do make to me and that I answer will also be recorded and I reserve the right to retain the recording

and publish it however I see fit and distribute it to any party I deem to have an interest in it.

This could include but would not be limited to various press agencies, internet forums, video streaming websites, etc.

 

I will begin charging the above costs from the date this letter is received.

As the letter is sent Recorded Delivery I will have a permanent record of the date of receipt.

 

I have got a regular subscription to a couple of CRAs (including Noddle which is totally free to use!)

and a couple of weeks after sending this letter I get an email alert saying my Credit Report had changed.

Logged on and checked only to find the Default lodged against me by Lowell had totally vanished.

 

Question is,

what are they up to?

Have they taken Option 1 and bailed out

or am I to expect a totally new entry being made

and to then be harrassed by another DCA further down the food chain?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never get into game of letter tennis with a dca. The only thing you need to send is a prove it letter.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you played regular letter tennis, with one of the worst DCA's too. The template letter is there for a reason. Once its sent, then you do not enter into any more correspondance unless they prove the debt is yours or a court claim is issued.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

So why have they removed all trace of their activities from my CRA then? It doesnt even show as a Correction or Settled, it has totally vanished. Are they in the habit of deleting an account and then magicing up a brand new one a but later on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They could be in the process of selling it on, or other things. One thing is for sure, NEVER trust lowell with ANYTHING. If you dont hace it down in writing that they have closed the account AND wont pass it on to a third party, then you need to be in the mindset of they still have the debt and will sell it on. They are also known for changing dates/amounts on CRA files.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

not a great fan of sending those letters that imply

you will charges them etc etc.

 

if the debt has vanished

either the default, that ORANGE placed on the account had reached 6yrs

so thus the whole account goes too.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default was added in 2010, about a year after I left the UK so its not disappeared because its 6 years old.

 

Im not a fan of sending threatening letters either but there have been some successes with Private Parking Companies being charged £250 and it being awarded at Small Claims. For the sake of their £110 its more of a gamble for them to lose than from me issuing and not winning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it actually looks like your letter worked :) If it has well done. I would suggest you keep an eye on your Credit files for a while to ensure that they dont attempt to sneak something back at a later date.

 

IMHO, your letter although it didnt appear to be headed as such, was in the nature of a formal complaint and I find it quite disppointing that you have not received a written response to it.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant see them wanting to admit that though, better that it just quietly dies and hope im not the sort of person to stir the hornets nest up a bit.

 

We have also had Christmas so there may be a nice Template Letter waiting to find its way to me shortly.

 

I will say though that I was getting SMS and phone calls most days from this crown but not had anything since they received my letter so somebody must have at least read what I had written and paid attention to it. Make no mistake, I would have issued an monthly Invoice for my services and followed it up with LBA and claim if they wanted to test me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...