Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

council tax advisors has anyone used them? - dont - read CAG


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3486 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya,

 

I'm getting hassle from a Ross and Roberts bailiff.

 

I have tried talking to the council about paying the bill and they just say you have to talk to the bailiff and he won't talk about paying off the bill unless I let him into the house which I won't do.

 

I came across these people yesterday council tax advisors.

 

They are meant to talk to the council for you to stop the bailiffs and come to some arrangement to pay off you bill for no fee.

 

I was wondering if anyone as used them or know about them?

 

I don't want to end up making things worse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks I thought it maybe to good to be true.

 

We are going to see the CAB tomorrow.

 

My other half started a thread about our problem last week and then forgot what this site was called.

 

It's so annoying I want to pay money but the bailiff is a no go because we wont let him in the house and says he will keep coming to the house to put up the charges even when we know he can't do that.

 

We rang Ross and Roberts to talk to them and they hung up on us.

 

We rang the council yesterday to try get them to some agreement but they keep saying we have to talk to the bailiff and then said the bailiff is right and he can keep racking up the charges with multi visits, which must be a lie.

 

We are paying down the bill by paying money to the council whether they like it or not.

 

But that still doesn't stop the bailiff and my other half is worried about the car because she needs it for work and if she loses that she won't be able to get to work because she starts very early in the morning, 7 miles away and there is no public transport.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must hide the vehicle away from the house. So long as the car is hidden and you prevent the bailiff from getting in to the property they can only charge £42.50 for two visits. They'll end up passing the debt back to the Local Authority at some point, so keep paying the council like you have been.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must hide the vehicle away from the house. So long as the car is hidden and you prevent the bailiff from getting in to the property they can only charge £42.50 for two visits. They'll end up passing the debt back to the Local Authority at some point, so keep paying the council like you have been.

 

Thanks that's what we will do.

 

I was very surprised when the council backed up the bailiff with they can charge you for multi visits.

 

Because of the date the bailiff first came between to wage dates we have already paid off £300 of the bill.

 

Mind you we have to leave some other bills unpaid to do this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Local authorities often have staff that are poorly trained and unknowledgable. Do stick to your guns.

 

I had a look at the website for that firm you mentioned, it's a glossy site for sure - and they've recently switched models to one where they don't charge apparently. Not sure *how* they are funded, it doesn't make that very clear. The spelling mistakes don't fill me with much confidence either! I don't think they are an Advice UK member from what I can find on the Advice UK website.

 

Edit: Tomtubby has provided a little more info, thanks for that :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was my understanding that Council Tax Advisors offer FREE advice over the phone but that they then charge a fee for contacting the local authority. From a number of people who have contacted me I am told that they offer a solution to repay the debt by way of an Attachment of Earnings. I could be wrong but given that the phone service is free it could be worth asking a few questions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was my understanding that Council Tax Advisors offer FREE advice over the phone but that they then charge a fee for contacting the local authority. From a number of people who have contacted me I am told that they offer a solution to repay the debt by way of an Attachment of Earnings. I could be wrong but given that the phone service is free it could be worth asking a few questions.

 

My other half did ring them last night and they gave all the usual advice don't let them into your house, lock doors and windows, move your car and they can only charge for 2 visits.

 

They also sent an email with a couple of forms one about your incoming and out going money and also this form.

 

It seems to give them a lot of powers.

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]48007[/ATTACH]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Providing the Bailiff has not been in your home or seized any goods outside then there is little he can do. You can always pay the Council direct using online banking, Council website or automated phone and allow extra for the lawful fees. Doing it this way sometimes upsets the Bailiff but so what.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They know nothing we don't. I would urge caution.

 

You are right I have decided not to use them.

 

I will go down the CAB tomorrow to see what they say and keep paying the council the money and keep moving the car.

 

And not let the Bailiff anywhere near the inside of the house and will only pay him for 2 visits when it's all sorted out and when he puts the latest bill in the letter box I will send them a letter saying they are trying to collect the wrong amount.

 

I will update the thread with how things develop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one other thing to be wary of.

 

As good as CAB may be their advice on Bailiff matters leaves a lot to be desired unless they have had specific training. I've seen in the past where they say the Bailiff is correct & you must let them in. Just be careful.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one other thing to be wary of.

 

As good as CAB may be their advice on Bailiff matters leaves a lot to be desired unless they have had specific training. I've seen in the past where they say the Bailiff is correct & you must let them in. Just be careful.

 

When you speak to the CAB, it *must* be a qualified 'Money Adviser' that you speak to. They WILL have the training on bailiff matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

See post 11. Don't let the bailiffs into your house, keep the obvious levy parked out of the way (your vehicle) so as Seq said they can only charge for two visits then.

 

After that, pay the council directly, ensuring your pay £42.50 on top of whatever is on the LO to cover the bailiff fees. This can be done online or via the automated phone system. If you can't pay it all at once, pay what you can on the same day every week. Either the bailiffs will return the account to the Council or you will be able to get the council to take the debt back due to the bailiffs making 'mistakes'.

 

I made an appointment for Council Tax Advisors to phone me two weeks ago so I could find out more about them. I have emails confirming they would, but the call was never forthcoming. That does not give me a lot of confidence in them. I think you'll get everything you need to sort out a CT debt here.

 

Do you know how many LO's the LA have, the dates they were issued and the amounts they were for? Also the date they were passed for enforcement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A latest update.

 

On Saturday received a renewed CT bill with current total, which was again different to what I'd heard over the phone, but not too worried about that.

At first, I thought they'd withdrawn it from the bailiffs.

 

Then this morning, I received a very long letter (3 pages) from the bailiffs, referring to the letter of complaint that I sent recently.

 

They checked with the bailiff and said that he'd acted in an appropriate manner.

Then said that they are in constant contact with the council, and the council inform them when we make a payment.

They produced a total in the letter of what we owe, which yet again was a completely different amount to what the council had told me over the phone.

Then confirmed in the letter that they want the £270 in charges so that they can come into the house and levy our goods.

 

So, thought I'd pop to the CAB. Which I've just got back from.

 

In all honesty, they were totally hopeless, and seemed more interested in backing up the bailiff than providing me with any help.

When I mentioned the £270 in charges, he totally ignored that.

 

He almost said that we should let them into the house at that point.

In reply, I said that there was no way they would gain entry.

Then he went to speak to his manager.

 

When he returned, he told me that the manager said not to let them in, to keep doors and windows locked.

 

I was informed to send two cheques for the £24.50 and £18.00 fees, even though a second visit hasn't happened yet.

Probably because we've been contesting everything, they haven't got around to that yet.

I imagine in the next day or two we will receive a knock.

He also said that we should send a cheque for a payment of what we can afford, and then try and negotiate with them.

 

But as we told them, we've had a letter from the bailiffs today, who refuse to negotiate unless they can charge us £270 in order to come into the house.

 

I also informed him that I would be forced to move my car every day now so that they can't levy it,

and as good as said that it wasn't exactly the right thing to do.

 

So, I just thought, they haven't levied it yet, so I can park it wherever I want to.

 

So, the CAB visit was a waste of time. The man in the know was the manager upstairs.

 

My next action will be to write to the bailiffs again, to say that the amount they have in their letter is incorrect,

and that some of the facts the bailiff said are incorrect also.

 

They said in the letter that the bailiff will continue to call, unless otherwise advised not to by the council.

 

So, I guess another letter to the council will be written asking them to call off the bailiffs as we are paying them.

 

It's just going around in circles all the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you asked the Bailiffs for a complete breakdown of their fees. As I'm elsewhere I don't have a copy of the letter to send them to hand but am sure someone else will post it up for you.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you asked the Bailiffs for a complete breakdown of their fees. As I'm elsewhere I don't have a copy of the letter to send them to hand but am sure someone else will post it up for you.

 

Hiya,

 

No I haven't asked them for a break down in fees as far as I know it's only £24.50 for the first visit.

 

But on the Council tax bill the council sent me on Saturday the had added £70 in court costs.

 

I have seen that letter somewhere on the site I will have to hunt it down and send it to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To tell you the truth I'm not really worried about Court costs they have added them to the council tax bill and we will just pay them off.

 

It more about the £270 costs the bailiffs are wanting to charge even before they talk about paying the bill off and the threats about putting the costs up with repeat visits.

 

But this site has put are minds to rest over this. We will send another letter to the council and bailiffs just to annoy them and keep them busy.

 

And keep paying the bill off to the Council.

 

Mind you one thing the CAB did say was we seem very clued up with our rights.

 

I will do another update at a future time and give a donation to the site at some point after Christmas.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3486 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...