Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you Dave. I've had nothing from Booking.com, just a message via the site from the host. I know I need to check my bank account, just trying to resolve some technical issues. HB  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre   Name of the Claimant ? JC INTERNATIONAL AQUISITION   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 22 May 2024   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? The def owes the claimant £300 in respect of gas and electricity charges supplied by OVO. Debt was assigned to the claimant with notice given to the def. Despite formal demand the def has failed to pay the debt and the claimant claims £300  and further claims interest pursuant to s69 of the CCA 1984.   What is the total value of the claim? £385   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Energy debt   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Moved home and they were the current energy supplier    Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax/Etc...) ? No   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt assigned to JC International   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not sure probably  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Again can't remember but probably    Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No   Why did you cease payments? Changed supplier   What was the date of your last payment? Never    Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No  
    • Their FAQs state - Cancellations and modifications If your booking has been cancelled, Booking.com refunds you immediately. The processing time may take 7 to 10 days and depends on your bank. If you have questions, contact your bank directly. I'm a regular Booking.com and AirBnB user.  The former have never cancelled.  The latter have and my money was refunded immediately (not that that helps you as we're not talking about AirBnB!) Best to check with your bank and see (a) if you did pay in advance and (b) if it has been refunded. Also, have you received a message from Booking.com officially stating the cancellation?
    • I'm not up to date with the Legal Aid rules but I'm not sure that many people qualify. HB
    • You question timescales a bit in thread - From my experience, defaulting everything and ignoring all non PAP letters, while making no payments: - 18 months to LOC - further 18 months to be at court Most are still silent 3 years in though!. If making token payments, court, if ever would be 4-5-6 years from now - Hope that helps. My debt is similar, I started it 2021 and wouldn't believe I'm already over half way through default period. You need to make the decisions but follow advice already given in this thread, and you will be fine. Best time to plant a tree was yesterday, second best time is today. Good luck BT  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest been unfair on what is owed on chain of refinanced Lloyds loans


kingst1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3856 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, brandnew to the forum so first post -

 

My partner took out a loan for £4k going back to 2006 and

struggled to make the loan repayments and

was then pushed into taking an additional £4k by an ex partner!!

 

now i know the debt has to be repaid but the repayment plan that Capquest have set up means it will take her just shy of 40 years to pay back !!

 

the interest has gone out of control and the debt now stands at 12k !

 

she repayed the loan for over a year at around 150 pounds per month

- this does not add up to me and seems unfair that the amount owed is now 12k.

 

is their a way that the interest can be frozen and the debt repaid at an amount that is fair ?(actually pays the debt and not just the interest)

 

any help would be much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome,

 

What's the history of this debt, last payment made on the account before Capquest got involved ect.

 

 

 

I've moved this thread to a more appropriate Forum.

 

Regards,

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

 

thanks for the speedy response

- i dont have much info on the debt appart from a statement from Natwest with payments taken of 25.00 from Capquest in May 2011

- looks like they have had the debt for nearly 3 years

Link to post
Share on other sites

first loan - 1/11/2007 settled 21/12/2007 162 x 60 months

 

second loan - 20/12/2007 settled 23/04/2007 195 x 60 months

 

third loan - 23/04/2008 236 x 60 months ***still outstanding to Capquest***

 

this is the info i have pulled from experian reference the debt

- dates do not add up and

my partner does never remeber taking loans to this amount

- Natwest orignally gave the loan.

 

This was while she only had a weekend job !!!

 

banks are supposed to lend responsibily and this to me says they have not !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA to crapest

sar to NatWest.

I hope you are NOT conversing on the phone either?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

first loan - 1/11/2007 settled 21/12/2007 162 x 60 months - £9720 [£7938 refinanced]

second loan - 20/12/2007 settled 23/04/2007 195 x 60 months - £11,700

third loan - 23/04/2008 236 x 60 months ***still outstanding to Capquest*** - £14,160

 

his is the info i have pulled from experian reference the debt

- dates do not add up and

my partner does never remeber taking loans to this amount

- Natwest orignally gave the loan.

 

This was while she only had a weekend job !!!

 

banks are supposed to lend responsibily and this to me says they have not !!

 

 

 

 

when the loans were each refinanced did she get a rebate?

has she had PPI?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds to me like when each loan was taken out the previous one was settled. The problem with some loans is that when they terminate the loan they include all the interest they would have received over the course of the loan.

 

It may be possible to make a full and final offer if you can get your hands on a lump sum.

I guess she is paying 25 a month,

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

just remember that if Lloyds sold the debt to crapest

 

that means there is something WRONG with the balance

 

you need to SAR Lloyds and FIND IT.

 

they could now OWE YOU>

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX

You should know by now that the sale of a debt to a debt purchaser means nothing in relation to the validity of the debt. It is perfectly possible that a 100% enforceable legal debt is sold. It's all about business. If you don't believe me, which you obviously won't then ask people like Sequenci

  • Haha 1

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...