Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

likely outcome of speeding


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3776 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hello eveyone

 

Can you help??

 

I have received a NIP as I am registered keeper. My 22 year old son was driving which I have declared and sent the form back within two days of receiving it.

 

My son is a named driver on the car and the car is fully legal.

 

My worry is that in July 2010 my son had an 18 month ban and fine for drink driving. this has now all passed and he has been a responsible driver since getting his licence back in 2012. He attended the drink driving course and learnt from his immature mistakes.

 

. When they issue the punishment for this speeding offence will the DR10 have an impact on their decision?

 

Thanks a lot

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't imagine so he will more then likely receive the same penalty points as anybody else, all depends on how far over the speed limit he was doing what the outcome will be. I dont imagine he will be offered a speed awareness course so will be an automatic fine and points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He should be offered a speed awareness course for 58 in a 50, assuming he hasn't done one in the last 3 years. Previous driving history, and courses other than speed awareness courses, are not taken into account.

 

If he can't do the course for any reason, it will be 3 points and £100.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no reason why the office processing the automatic tickets would even know about the previous offence, until they see his licence, but they make the decision about the fixed penalty before that.

 

Therefore, it's unlikely at that level of speeding that he'll get any more than SP50 with 3 points and a standard fine.

 

There's every chance that he could be offered a speed awareness course as an alternative, as long as he qualifies, because the speeding is not above the 'serious' limit. It is possible that the drink-driving course would rule him out but I don't know for certain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are only offered a course if you have not been on one already within the last 3 years, in Cambridgeshire it is £87, no driving is involved

R.I.P my beautiful grey ghost, gone but never forgotten, taken so suddenly, 04/07/2004 ~ ~ 02/03/2017

Gone but never forgotten,Little Miss Sunshine, Alisha Marie. 15/12/2005 ~ ~ 13/02/2006

Our  beloved Dalmatian Jazz,  gone to join Wal at Rainbow Bridge, hope you are now pain free .  20/9/2005 ~ ~ 24/3/2019

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can depend on the police force in that area, from what i was led to believe each force has its own criteria in regards to how far over the limit you where to if they offer you a speed awareness course. I got flashed in Manchester doing 36 in 30 (was lost, it was dark and i was scared and had no idea what the limit was plus my dashboard light failed about 30 mins earlier) i got offered the speed awareness course. Was later quashed due to a clerical error, they had uploaded the wrong image of the camera i was caught on which showed a different road to the one i was apparently driving on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe all forces are supposed to have now standardised the level at which speed awareness courses are offered. I think it now stands at limit + 10% + 6. So in a 50 limit the course should be offered up to 61mph

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just an update,

 

My son got three offers and has to choose only one they are:

 

1. 3 points and £100 fine

 

2. speed awareness course which will cost between £70 and £100 and must be booked within 28 days of letter. - no points -it says the course is approx. 4 hours long

 

3. a court appearance

 

He is choosing number 2!!

 

Thanks for your help everyone on cag x x x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

That is good for him. The course has to be the way to go. When he has it, would you get him to say what happened. Just being nosy as I haven't heard of anyone who has done the course.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did the course about 5 years ago, usual story just got flashed on a Gatso -37 in a 30, 6 hours of unmitigated boredom, patronising and a reminiscence of my days in Primary school in the 1950's. Did I learn anything? not really, the "Tutors " were unmitigated muppets whose technical knowledge was suspect anyway, didnt know the various speed limits for commercial vehicles for example. I suppose the only positive thing is it does make you aware of Gatsos and the like and sneaky camera vans and it does save getting points ! My "cost" at the time was £60.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did the course about 5 years ago, usual story just got flashed on a Gatso -37 in a 30, 6 hours of unmitigated boredom, patronising and a reminiscence of my days in Primary school in the 1950's. Did I learn anything? not really, the "Tutors " were unmitigated muppets whose technical knowledge was suspect anyway, didnt know the various speed limits for commercial vehicles for example. I suppose the only positive thing is it does make you aware of Gatsos and the like and sneaky camera vans and it does save getting points ! My "cost" at the time was £60.00

 

Well I hope it's changed since then as that sounds ridiculous. Speed awareness and the results of speeding should be the most important part of it however, the saving of the 3 points is very useful.

 

I can say, hand on heart that I don't deliberately speed. The problem is that if you stick to the speed limits, you spend too much time looking at the speedo and not the road. At one stage, you could listen to the engine noise and know what the speed was. No longer.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

did one recently, was 4 hours long and no driving involved. Yes while it is boring it is better then getting points an your licence and informing your insurance company thus increasing your premiums and was surprised to learn of all the new rules that are now enforced in the Highway code.

R.I.P my beautiful grey ghost, gone but never forgotten, taken so suddenly, 04/07/2004 ~ ~ 02/03/2017

Gone but never forgotten,Little Miss Sunshine, Alisha Marie. 15/12/2005 ~ ~ 13/02/2006

Our  beloved Dalmatian Jazz,  gone to join Wal at Rainbow Bridge, hope you are now pain free .  20/9/2005 ~ ~ 24/3/2019

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have taken the 3 points and paid the fine as less hassle and insurance companies seem to ignore SP30 for speeding. I could take bening cooped up in a room for a couple of hours listening to some moron droning on aboutr nothing. However I have no recent offences. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It used to be true that a single speeding offence didn't usually affect your insurance premium, but it's increasingly not the case

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/insurance/motorinsurance/9146173/Car-insurance-costs-rise-by-up-to-20pc-for-first-time-speed-offenders.html

 

At least part of the reason is speed awareness courses. Once upon a time 3 points meant you'd been caught speeding once, and that quite likely you were just over the speed limit. Nowadays most people in that position do a course, so if you have 3 points it probably means that you've been caught twice and/or you were quite a long way over the limit.

 

The increase is likely to be greater if you have other convictions or you're otherwise high risk, and a young person with previous for drink driving is already about as high risk as it gets.

 

Someone will doibtless pipe up that insurers nowadays treat speed awareness courses as convictions anyway, but that's actually only true of a handful of companies (Admiral mainly), and they'll have to stop soon when the changes to the Rehabilitation of Offemders Act mean that alternatives to prosecution will be treated in the same way as cautions and will become spent immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

My son attended the speed awareness course today. He was given a booklet to complete throughout the four hour session. There were two speakers that spoke about stopping distances and speed limits. He said he had to have discussions with the people on his table about how they would respond to given scenarios.

 

 

There was a little interesting information but mainly boring anyway it saved him getting 3 points.the course cost £97

Thankfully it's all over now.

Thanks for all your responses which were very useful when entering the unknown.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...