Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Caught fare evading twice since May on a bus


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3741 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Both times were after getting on a free-travel zone, but basically going further on when the free-travel zone ended.

 

I just wondered what punishment i'm looking at?

 

The first time i paid an on the spot fine of £40, but this time he said because i've done it before in the past year, he will pass a report onto the TFL?

 

I understand i will most likely be prosecuted, and have a criminal record?

 

Or will it be worse that i've done it before in the same year?

 

Also, in terms of the fine what am i looking at? How much will i pay?

 

I don't have a job atm, so i'm a bit worried how much i will have to pay?

 

Anyone know a ballpark figure of what the fine will be?

 

Thanks guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both times were after getting on a free-travel zone, but basically going further on when the free-travel zone ended.

 

I just wondered what punishment i'm looking at?

 

The first time i paid an on the spot fine of £40, but this time he said because i've done it before in the past year, he will pass a report onto the TFL?

 

I understand i will most likely be prosecuted, and have a criminal record?

 

Or will it be worse that i've done it before in the same year?

 

Also, in terms of the fine what am i looking at? How much will i pay?

 

I don't have a job atm, so i'm a bit worried how much i will have to pay?

 

Anyone know a ballpark figure of what the fine will be?

 

Thanks guys.

 

Assuming you plead guilty by post and don't want a hearing, a fine of about £350-£400, costs of around £100, victim surcharge of £35-£40, plus compensation which will be the total amount of bus fares evaded and obviously a criminal record. So £500 - £600 will be the total amount, give or take.

 

If you plead "not guilty" and get found guilty, (but it would be stupid to do this), the fine will be higher.

 

They are able to deduct a set amount directly from your benefits until it's paid - and if you do get a job, they can deduct this from your wages, or even imprison you if you fail to pay.

 

It is likely that TfL will refer the court to your previous indiscretions, and the court may consider that when sentencing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming you plead guilty by post and don't want a hearing, a fine of about £350-£400, costs of around £100, victim surcharge of £35-£40, plus compensation which will be the total amount of bus fares evaded and obviously a criminal record. So £500 - £600 will be the total amount, give or take.

 

If you plead "not guilty" and get found guilty, (but it would be stupid to do this), the fine will be higher.

 

They are able to deduct a set amount directly from your benefits until it's paid - and if you do get a job, they can deduct this from your wages, or even imprison you if you fail to pay.

 

It is likely that TfL will refer the court to your previous indiscretions, and the court may consider that when sentencing.

 

Thanks for the reply.

 

Wow, that's more than i thought.

 

My mate got convicted of the same offence back in 2008, but was only fined about £80-£100 after pleading guility by post without a hearing, do you know why my costs amount to far more?

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.

 

Wow, that's more than i thought.

 

My mate got convicted of the same offence back in 2008, but was only fined about £80-£100 after pleading guility by post without a hearing, do you know why my costs amount to far more?

 

Cheers.

 

I think he is telling you wrong information then, or he wasn't convicted by a court. The fine might have been, say, £100, but you then have to add court costs and surcharge/compensation on, it would have been around £200-£300 at the least, and that was 5 years ago!

 

A "Penalty Fare" is now £80, so a court isn't really going to fine you less than that!!

 

TfL's court costs are currently £100 alone, never mind the fine and victim surcharge.

 

If you come out of court with change from £500, you've done well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he is telling you wrong information then, or he wasn't convicted by a court. The fine might have been, say, £100, but you then have to add court costs and surcharge/compensation on, it would have been around £200-£300 at the least, and that was 5 years ago!

 

A "Penalty Fare" is now £80, so a court isn't really going to fine you less than that!!

 

TfL's court costs are currently £100 alone, never mind the fine and victim surcharge.

 

If you come out of court with change from £500, you've done well.

 

I remember i saw his letter, it definitely said it. It was done by court and he could also let them know his financial details, and he plead guilty by post.

 

Maybe it was different 5 years ago?

 

Wow, coming out of court only £500 down is good?!

 

FFS. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember i saw his letter, it definitely said it. It was done by court and he could also let them know his financial details, and he plead guilty by post.

 

Maybe it was different 5 years ago?

 

Wow, coming out of court only £500 down is good?!

 

FFS. :(

 

I've not seen anywhere where you have an ethical problem with fare dodging, or any remorse. That is your right, but may not engender much sympathy for your current plight.

 

If you aren't bothered by the ethical consideration of fare evading, and didn't heed the warning of your first time being caught : look at it purely as a mathematical exercise ....

 

Given one of the intents of prosecuting people is to discourage others from deliberate fare evasion : What level of penalty is appropriate taking into account all the people fair evading and not getting caught, and how many offenses are committed before someone gets caught for the second time, (caught for the second time, so doesn't get off with a penalty fare, rather than the number of offences by a deliberate evader that lead to being caught twice)?

Edited by BazzaS
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he is telling you wrong information then, or he wasn't convicted by a court. The fine might have been, say, £100, but you then have to add court costs and surcharge/compensation on, it would have been around £200-£300 at the least, and that was 5 years ago!

 

A "Penalty Fare" is now £80, so a court isn't really going to fine you less than that!!

 

TfL's court costs are currently £100 alone, never mind the fine and victim surcharge.

 

If you come out of court with change from £500, you've done well.

 

Actually you may be right, i remember he said he grovelled a bit on an apology letter, and maybe they settled out of court?

 

So, that probably would've amounted to £80 - £100 fine and not the court charges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've not seen anywhere where you have an ethical problem with fare dodging, or any remorse. That is your right, but may not engender much sympathy for your current plight.

 

If you aren't bothered by the ethical consideration of fare evading, and didn't heed the warning of your first time being caught : look at it purely as a mathematical exercise ....

 

Given one of the intents of prosecuting people is to discourage others from deliberate fare evasion : What level of penalty is appropriate taking into account all the people far evading and not getting caught, and how many offenses are committed before someone gets caught for the second time, (caught for the second time, so doesn't get off with a penalty fare, rather than the number of offences by a deliberate evader that lead to bring caught twice)?

 

Yeah, your probably right.

 

btw, will they take into consideration that i got on at a free-travel zone?

 

I told the guy i didn't know the free-travel zone had ended.

 

Also, are fines higher for Train evaders as opposed to Bus evaders?

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I've still not received any correspondence from them.

 

Does it usually take this long, if so when can i expect something from them?

 

Luckily i've found myself a job since this incident.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you would have gotten the stuff by now.

 

looks like you are ok

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you would have gotten the stuff by now.

 

looks like you are ok

 

dx

 

 

 

Whilst dx100uk MAY well be right, do remember that at busy times it can take 6-8 weeks for TfL or the TOCs to process these matters and they legally have six months in which to put any allegation before a Court.

 

The OP posted on 28th October, which is just 8 weeks ago and we've had the Christmas post period during that time.

 

You may not hear anything, but if you get any letter, do respond to it immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes of course read the title properly dx....

 

since may, not IN May.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.

 

Wow, that's more than i thought.

 

My mate got convicted of the same offence back in 2008, but was only fined about £80-£100 after pleading guility by post without a hearing, do you know why my costs amount to far more?

 

Cheers.

 

I would imagine that the fines and costs have increased since 2008 as do train fares !!

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst dx100uk MAY well be right, do remember that at busy times it can take 6-8 weeks for TfL or the TOCs to process these matters and they legally have six months in which to put any allegation before a Court.

 

The OP posted on 28th October, which is just 8 weeks ago and we've had the Christmas post period during that time.

 

You may not hear anything, but if you get any letter, do respond to it immediately.

 

Cheers for the reply.

 

I'll still keep a look out for anything from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Received a letter from them, and then sent my information off. Received a letter from the court and the fine was only £247 in total.

 

I guess i can be quite pleased with that outcome?

 

Especially with my previous history of evading fare?

 

If it was a fine, from a court, it will come with a criminal record.

 

If that doesn't bother you, and you are still classing yourself as pleased with the outcome then it seems you are merely viewing the fine as a trade off against the times you didn't pay your fare.

 

Have you advised your employers of your conviction for a crime (which they can conclude is one of dishonesty)? If not, does your employment contract require you to tell them ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...