Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Like
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please help need urgent advice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3871 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks to anyone that can help and give me some advice.

 

I have had a problem with another worker, o

 

ne day he called me at work and said that I was unprofessional and not a team player, unbalanced and that I had some problems.

 

we had an argument on the phone, he said that I had changed and was not the same person he once knew, (my husband died 11 months ago).

I said of course I have changed and this is my new life and I am struggling to get through it. Tuff he said get on with it.

 

This really shocked me coming from him, as we have worked together for the past 7 years side by side.

I knew that this man has a mental problem and that I have never told any one.

I told him that he is losing the plot and that he cannot go around shouting at me and telling me these horrid things.

 

I complained to my manager as I was so shocked I sobbed all the way home that night.

He agreed that he was out of order and that he will see him.

 

6 weeks went by, I was fine just had to speak to him for work but that suited me.

Then one day he called me at home and had another rant and rave at me.

 

I went higher to the area manager.

She said that she will speak to him and what is it I want to happen.

I simply said that this man should keep his opinions to himself,

and that I see not were in the company policy that I have to talk to him again on personal matters. She agreed.

 

the higher manager has called me and this man in a meeting this wednesday to discuss a way forward.

 

Now I have already told her that this man has frightened me to the point that I do not want to be in the same room as him on my own.

He was degraded me on the phone and to this day I am still shocked at his actions.

 

I feel that I am not getting took serious and all they are interested in is the company.

I have already told them that I am speaking to him on a work basis which I am and being civil about it.

 

Can anyone tell why I have to have a meeting and discuss my feelings in front of the man that has verbally attacked me on the phone and to my face.

This man is unbalanced and I am not the only member of staff to say this.

He is on medication for depression and is often at work drunk.

 

I know this must be a silly dispute to some people and you may think that other people have real problems in the work place,

but I am at my wits end, normally I would chat to my husband about this, but as I said he has passed away, so I am totally on my own.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do NOT have to appear in front of the other person. WHat they are doing is called a mediation meeting, where you both air your grievances. However, you do not have to appear if you feel threatened or frightened by him/her. The company should make allowances, such as interviewing you separately and putting each of your views forward for your opinions.

 

To your companies credit, they have identified a problem and are trying to rectify it. They are just going about it the wrong way.

 

You say he is on medication and is often drunk at work? Have you actually reported this to senior management? Is him being drunk at work causing any health and safety hazards?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I told them about his medication, only because of the way he attacked me on the phone, I said maybe that is why he is like this. The manager said he will ask him. Then when I spoke to the manager again he said it is best he does not ask him.

 

I just looked and thought what the hell, we both drive company vehicles with other people in. But really they do not believe me. I am at my wits end with this man.

 

I just cannot believe that I have to sit in this room, I just know that one of the questions will be:

 

Why do you feel frightened?

 

I cannot believe that I am going to have to go through what he said to me, it comes down to the fact that we were close friends at work, and like I said to him I cannot understand why you are like this, please tell me why. The answer I got was tuff, But he will not do this in front of the manager, he will be the model employee.

 

I hope that you are able to understand were I am coming from with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you consider him a risk to other staff, you MUST inform management. Go higher if you need to.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told by HR to say sorry to him, I have refused to do this. I have done nothing wrong.

 

So I cannot understand why this is going on.

 

Believe me I am creating more trouble, opening a can of worms I was told if I go higher, so it is out of the question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No youre not crating more trouble. If his actions are endangering colleagues, you have a duty to inform management.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have blocked him from my private phone, but we both have work phones.

 

Believe me they will not listen to me, he is a model employee in front of them, other staff are scared to speak up, then tell me how they have had run ins with him, but i am the only one that has went further with this.

 

All I wanted was for him to keep his opinions to himself in the future. But he is taking this further like a baby saying that I am not talking to him, wonder why I am not talking to him.

 

Well I think that there really is no answer to my question, so will attend the meeting on wednesday and see what the outcome of that is.

 

But thanks for you help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im rather worried you are giving in too easy here. After all you have said, you are willing to back down without hesitation?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I went for the meeting but 24 hours before that the manager said it was a mediation and nothing to worry about, hence why I walked in there alone. Only to be told to say sorry to him and look him in the eye while I do it. Because I hesitated for about ten seconds, the manager said if I do not say sorry then she will be forced to start a disciplinary against me, but she does not want to do that.

 

I cannot believe what has happened today, this man has verbally abused me and I have been told to say sorry, she said if we become friends then all well and done but if we contact each other on private numbers she will discipline us.

When he left the room I totally broke down and said that he has a mental issue and that he is often drunk at work, well she looked at me and then turned and said how is the family. I have decided to ask for the copy of the notes, will be phoning tomorrow to let them know I am taking some time off.

She said she interviewed at witness, but never said what the out come was. I spoke to the witness and said thanks for speaking up, the do not know what I was on about. They said no one has spoken to them. Well what more can I say, least of all I am a little upset and so confused at the moment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont just take time off. Get a doctor to sign you off.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This may sound harsh but are you 100% sure that he is drunk at work. I remember seeing a well known actress on children in need many years ago and thought she was very drunk. When she later died (some time later) it was announced she had been suffering a long term debilitating illness.

I have an issue with HR saying that if you contact each other outside work they would discipline you. That can not be fair or right although I do not see why you would contact him and maybe the threat will stop him. It is also wrong for HR to say they have spoken to person X.

 

The ultimate way forward is to resign and cite constructive dismissal or at least tell HR that you have been advised that is what to do. I know it is difficult when you have a job and someone turns on you.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres no need to resign. Get your doctor to sign you off with stress or whatever, and take that time off to compose yourself and work out your next step forward.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well really need the time off, you are right to compose myself, some one said to me today that after the death of my husband I did not have enough time to me. So maybe some time off will do me good and let me see a lot clearer as to what to do next.

 

But I think that whole meeting is well out of order and that is what is bothering me more that this man at the moment. Ten minutes before the meeting I was told by the manager that I represented the company to such a high standard and that they cannot thank me enough, and that I had a true passion as the day I started. (this was a huge management meeting I attended)

 

So forgive me when I stay that this is what has shocked me today, what the hell is going on I say.

 

I feel i need to ask that manager tomorrow that I thought this was a mediation meeting and not a threatening meeting where I have to confront a man that I already told you about and that scared the **** out of me.

 

Sorry just ranting and getting this out of my head.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can only imagine how the death of your husband affected you. I had been separated from my wife for 10 years when she died but even 14 months on I often think that I must phone her.She will no doubt be laughing at my current predicament and would be saying I told you so. My dad died nearly 3 years ago and I know that Mum said the first year was the worst but she still has her moments (understatement)

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, life is hard, but when you have some one at work saying to tuff to the death of my husband it really hits home. But really thanks for the support in that. One statement I said in the meeting is why are some people hell bent on hurting for no reason.guess what no reply, I think I expect to much to the so called friends at work

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say that until you have lost someone you love/care for then you can not even pretend to understand what is going on. Some people appear to cope but ....

 

For once fletch, i am in 10000% agreement with you.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...