Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm trying to unravel this – but I get the impression that there was no contract between you and EVRi and that you didn't even choose them but instead you decided use some third party parcel broker in the USA which organised the delivery. Is this correct? EVRi came into the picture because they would then eventually selected for part of the journey although you had no knowledge that it might be them and I suppose it didn't really matter as long as the item got to you. Secondly, I really don't understand the journey which this item made. You bought the item from somebody in the USA. They then were meant to dispatch it to you to another address in the USA but for some reason or other it came to the UK and then into the hands of EVRi at which point it was lost or stolen. More confusion here because you now tell us that EVRi marked it as being out for delivery but it was never delivered. This suggests that it was going to be delivered to a UK address but earlier on you said that it was going to be delivered to USA address. I think you need to look at the story. Maybe show it to a friend of yours who is not particularly where the details and ask them if they can make head or tail of it and then come back to us with clarification so that we fully understand. Also, I think we'd like to know what the item is, how was it declared, what was the value which was declared. You said it was a valuable item because it was rare and collectable. I gather from this that it is non-fungible. We need to understand more about this. Was an insurance policy purchased to cover it during the delivery process. I understand that this rare and collectable item be valued at £200. Have evidence this value. This could become very important. Also you have given is no idea when this happened. We need to understand the full timescale. There are a number of possibilities here including the possibility of the contract action against EVRi on the basis of your third party rights or an action for negligence but we need to know far more and we need to get a story that makes sense.   Finally, I understand that you have sent the letter of claim. What did it say? How much time did you give them? What did you expect to happen as a result of the letter of claim? Whatever the answers to those questions might be, clearly you had no idea how to proceed after having sent such a letter. A letter of claim is meant to be a serious threat of some legal action if some condition which you have stipulated is not complied with. You set a deadline for compliance and at the end of that deadline you issue the court action. Clearly you are not in a position to do that so your letter of claim is a bluff and undermines your credibility and it will find its way into the EVRi wastepaper basket – if it's not there already.  
    • Good morning. I just wanted to check something please. The other side have moved slightly and negotiated a full and final offer price to end this matter. I am happy with this. However, I want to make sure this is the end of the matter and am emailing the following over to them prior to payment. Is this enough to ensure they can come back for nothing else? Thanks -------------------------------------------------- Dear Sir.   With regards your last email below.   I am pleased to agree to the full and final settlement figure given below.   Can you confirm this payment will be in full and final payment with no further claim to be brought against me in this matter?   Best regards
    • 100% sure I didn't receive it, that why my first post is with the £100 letter.
    • Engine, the technology business Starling Bank was built on, has been busy launching banks around the world, from Romania to Australia.View the full article
    • use this your WS and inc this as an exhibit off to bed now 3 nights been up till 4am aurora watching wont be on too early as it's lambing season out herding with the dog. your WS main thrust is the debt would now be SB'd , the DN was filed xxxyrs+months after it should have been thus unlawfully extending  SB date to infinity. highlight their admittance regarding errors at that time period in your 'redetermination'  paragraph. agreements unreadable. would have already been written off due to SLC age write off criteria has they not issued the claim to stop the SB clock when they had no paperwork to prove their case in the 1st place. never earned over threshold. dx       Erudio - stopped sending email deferments won at FOS DRN-4141462.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

TfL consults on proposals to stop accepting cash fare payments on London buses


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3876 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Transport for London (TfL) is today launching a public consultation seeking customers' views on proposals to withdraw cash fare payments on London buses.

 

Since the introduction of the Oyster card in 2003, and the launch of contactless payment cards on London's buses last year, more and more passengers are now appreciating the convenience and value for money these options offer.

 

This year cash fares will make up less than one per cent of bus journeys - down from 25 per cent in 2000 - and TfL is now putting proposals to passengers that would see cash fare payments on London buses ending in 2014.

 

Paying with Oyster or a contactless payment card guarantees the cheapest fare, currently £1 less than a cash fare.

 

Consultation now open - have your say

A public consultation is available on the TfL website (tfl.gov.uk/cashless).

This consultation closes on 11 October 2013.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet anothet bad idea.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This consultation will not reach the visitors who inject so much into London's economy.

How would *we* feel, were we to board a bus in Beijing, Prague or Teheran, only to be turfed off for having no means of payment other than cash - and not having a clue what the driver is trying to gesticulate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are signs everywhere that says to have money read before boarding. It's like that pretty much everywhere in major countries.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
This consultation will not reach the visitors who inject so much into London's economy.

How would *we* feel, were we to board a bus in Beijing, Prague or Teheran, only to be turfed off for having no means of payment other than cash - and not having a clue what the driver is trying to gesticulate?

 

This is how you travel in the Netherlands all public transport is by chipkaart only, its easy to use and there are top up machines in supermarkets, train stations etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a non-London disabled persons bus pass. It doesn't work on the card reader.

My wife has the same - she just holds it up so the driver can see it and walks by the slow penny counters. The school children do the same - the drivers are quick enough to spot the kids without the passes.

 

Maybe here is different to London as most of our buses are 'drop the cash in the machine, no change given' so the driver doesn't need to keep an eye on what cash person is counting out as it is just a quick glance once the cash is in the machine to ensure it is right.

 

[EDIT]

My wife has just told me that her pass is now 'hover over the reader' type so maybe other counties/areas should upgrade their disabled passes too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm 50/50 on this.

 

Having worked in the West Mids where they have the 'drop money in chute' system (where the drivers don't actually handle the money) and also worked at a much smaller bus company where the drivers gave change, I think there are pro's and cons. A cashless system would undoubtedly make the driver's job easier, but to ensure there was no fare evasion, more inspectors would be needed I think. Also, I don't see why pass holders should get an advantage over cash paying passengers by being able to barge passed them while they are trying to pay their fare. I personally would make following passengers wait their turn... including concessionary pass holders. Obviously a cashless system would resolve that issue as well.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, I don't see why pass holders should get an advantage over cash paying passengers by being able to barge passed them while they are trying to pay their fare. I personally would make following passengers wait their turn... including concessionary pass holders. Obviously a cashless system would resolve that issue as well.

 

But why should we forced to stand in the rain waiting for someone to find their wallet and enough money for the bus fare?

Link to post
Share on other sites

But why should we forced to stand in the rain waiting for someone to find their wallet and enough money for the bus fare?

 

From my experience, people (particularly concessionary pass holders) will push past what ever the weather. By doing so distracts the driver from the passenger in front of him thus making a further delay in him/her dealing with the said fare paying passenger. Also, where the bus stop usually is a fairly busy one, it will normally have a shelter in place.

 

In addition to that, the terms on the rear of a concessionary pass will (or use to) state; "the pass does not give the holder priority over other intending passengers" or words to that effect.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think this is very welcoming, in London or anywhere else. If you are a tourist, or just a visitor to an area for a day, you really shouldn't have to run around trying to buy an Oyster card or whatever the local pass happens to be called. If your family visit from outside London and you want to hop on a bus why should you waste time looking for an outlet that sells the cards. You can top up Oyster cards in a lot of places, but you can't get the card unless you go to a station, or specific place that sells them. Tourists often start walking from their hotel, end up some distance away and just want to hop on a bus and get back. Do we really think they should have to work out where to buy a card, and have to pay the deposit on it, before they are allowed to get on a bus?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is absolutely ridiculous and purely business oriented, looking at figures rather than thinking about the little guy. That under 1% means nothing on a balance sheet, but it is a big deal to ppl it could affect.

 

A person can easily get stranded in areas and after-shop hours. How can you have money in your pocket but be refused access to public transport? What if I lose my card? What if I don't use my card regularly and have no need to always be topped up, but suddenly need to go somewhere on a night bus? Sure it'll cost more paying cash but I have the option. Now being without card will be much more expensive, paying £5 for the card from somewhere then paying more money to top it up. And that's only *if* I find a place sells the card in the first place in the early hours.

 

ppl leaving club areas in the early hours that aren't in central london would be even worse off if they don't have a card on them.

 

Not everyone can call a taxi on a whim. Imagine someone that can't even beg/borrow for change because the cash is useless if they lost their card with no shops open. I've seen ppl down on their luck scraping together £2.5 for a night bus for one reason or another, now it'll be closer to a tenner then somehow finding a place which sells cards at 3 in the morning.

 

The card now becomes more important than necessary. Technology making life easier? Yeah right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the point gigs is making is that if you have lost your card/money/bank card late at night then it's probably going to be easier to get someone to lend you £2.50 for a night bus, rather than having to find somewhere that is selling replacement Oyster cards at that time, and you'd need rather more than £2.50. None of the Ticket Stops where I live are open after 5.30 p.m., so if I were in this predicament I'd have to walk three miles to the nearest underground station, and they too are closed after midnight. For women in particular I think this is a safety issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but it is still a weak argument. What if you miss the last bus for example. Surely you are just as likely to do that as loose your card/money/wallet. There are a number of different scenarios that could 'leave you stranded' that we already 'suffer' from but which we still endure. Surely a taxi is the safest and most suitable option when you could pay the fare upon arrival at your home as I have done myself.

 

As I said, I am not entirely in support of this either, but if you are going to put arguments forward, at least make them strong ones. Loosing your card/wallet etc isn't a good one IMHO.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

People have to learn to take responsibility for thier own actions.

 

If's/but's/maybe's are not a good enough reason NOT to introduce cashless.

 

It cost's TFL £26 million to run the cash side of the fares, and yet cash accounts for a minimal amount.

All I ask is to be treated fairly and lawfully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...