Jump to content


Ex-Employer not honest on JSA form


itstheone
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3886 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

My Daughter was recently sacked from her job. There were two reasons that were cited at the disciplinary, one was upheld and the other one, fraudulent claim of mileage wasn't. They realised it was a simple mistake.

 

She signed on and started to receive JSA.

 

However she has just received a letter from the benefits office as they look into the claim, as they do.

 

Her employer has stated the two reasons why she was dismissed even though one wasn't upheld. She has the letter from the employer saying that the mileage claim wasn't upheld, for the reason stated above.

 

Is there anything she can do? She's obviously going to respond to the benefit office and enclose the letter from the employer stating that the mileage claim wasn't upheld.

 

In my mind they shouldn't have even mentioned it.

 

Any advice please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was sacked in 2007 but still got JSA because I stated that the sacking was malicious and was a laid-off masqueraded as dismissal. It's all about convincing the Decision Makers. In my experience the only case when you definitely don't get JSA is when you walk of you job for no reason.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was sacked in 2007 but still got JSA because I stated that the sacking was malicious and was a laid-off masqueraded as dismissal. It's all about convincing the Decision Makers. In my experience the only case when you definitely don't get JSA is when you walk of you job for no reason.

 

Yes, these things are all decided on a "case by case" basis, so it's worthwhile adding as much evidence as is available. Maybe it won't help in the end, but I don't see how it could hurt to make sure the DMs are aware of the true circumstances.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...