Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • See what you think of the attached. I have to do some proofreading of an English grammar book for an Italian publisher this weekend - for money! - so I'm afraid corrections and suggestions will come in dribs & drabs.  I've totally knackered the layout, the numbering and the order of your Exhibits but there will be several versions done so don't worry about that ATM. Your arguments are superb. What is less superb is the way you jump from one to the other and back again, so I haven't changed your words, but I have moved the paragraphs around and given each section a heading. New bits are shown in red. Crossed out crossed out in black is something you've quoted from the government Code of Practice, but that has since been withdrawn so unfortunately that argument has to go. Your paras 7 & 8 don't harm your case but to me are waffle and can go.  Keeping the arguments clear & concise will always impress a judge. IMPORTANT - did you ever send Simple Simon a CPR request? Defendant's WS - version 2.pdf
    • Björn Ulvaeus appeared on stage in East Yorkshire at a conference held at the Bridlington Spa.View the full article
    • Hi Schipoo and thanks for the update. This is a brilliant result as rergards your fight with HMRC. If you can manage a Donation to the site, it would be greatly appreciated. Let us know how it goes as regards the fees being sought by Independant Tax.
    • A never ending torrent of **it Outrage as ‘tidal wave’ of sewage floods historic market town’s unique chalk river WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Water firm pumps sewage into river Misbourne, Amersham on 21 ‘dry days’ during nearly five month period  
    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Problem with Coveare Insurance ( Lloyds T.S.B )


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3944 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi this is my first post on here , hope someone can please advise me .We came home from 5 nights away at my mothers last week to find our garden shed had been broken into and my fishing equipment was stolen so I contacted my insurance company who arranged for a loss adjuster to visit yesterday , before she left she advised us that all was ok she just needed to check what the maximum amount covered on our policy was and get back to us , We had'nt heard back from her by lunchtime today so I got back to the insurance company who advised me that a stipulation had been added to the policy in 2012 that stated that a home security system must be installed and in use and serviced yearly from a registered company ,I was flabergasted to hear this as this was the first I have heard of this ,it was'nt on the policy when I first took it out in 2009 ,I checked my policy and on the documentation on page one question 3 is Do you have a burgler alarm fitted ? . and my reply is in black and white NO . I Checked the small print on this years and last years policy and the alarm issue was placed on there in 2012 due apparently to us living in an high risk area ,I am absolutely distraught as they are saying my insurance is invalid and has been since this stipulation was put on ,I feel that the company knowing I had no alarm should have written to me stating there new rules and offering me the choice of complying with it and installing an alarm or offer me a policy with this stipulation removed even if the costs rose or just said because I had no alarm fitted they wouldnt insure me ,I feel misslead and that I have been robbed twice ,I paid my policy month after month loyally ,while all the time the insurance company knew full well my policy was worthless ,I have contacted the ombudsman and F.S.O who both think I have a good case ,I have also formally complained to both coveare and lloyds tsb ,I am very worried and upset though so any help or guidance would be gratefully received ,Thanks Guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

When Insurers make significant changes from renewal they must make this very clear in their renewal documentation and normally allow time for compliance with the new security terms. It is no good just adding this term on at renewal, because to obtain quotes and then arrange for an alarm system to be installed would probably take at least a month.

 

So if Lloyds TSB did not make the alarm requirement crystal clear and not tucked away on page 3, then you have a really good case.

 

It is arguable as to whether an alarm would have made any difference anyway, as I would guess that any alarm endorsement was for the house and not a shed. As far as I know for a shed you would fit a shed alarm and it is not normally a part of a main houses system. So it is arguable as to whether this alarm requirement is relevant to the loss anyway.

 

I have handled such changes to policyholders terms for an Insurance company. If the underwriters changed the security terms for a postcode area, there is no reason for them not running a list of all policies affected and for them to write to customers immediately, telling them of the Alarm requirement. That way, policyholder would know that from renewal the alarm would be required, so they either arrange installation or they take their Insurance elsewhere, where it is not a requirement. I would question Lloyds TSB as to when their underwriters were aware of the alarm requirement for the postcode. If this was sometime ahead of renewal, I would ask why they left it until renewal and then hid this requirement on page 3, rather than make it clear on the renewal letter.

 

Make sure you inform Lloyds TSB complaints department that you are unhappy and that the FOS are keen to look at this, if there is going to be a problem. I think the FOS would probably agree with you, but this is not guaranteed, as it will be an individuals decision, based on looking at the documents.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your reply and thoughts Unclebulgaria 67 , they are more or less what we think , To be fair when I rang both Coveare and Lloyds Tsb the people I spoke to on the phone all appeared equally shocked that this stipulation was placed on the policy when I had clearly answered no when asked whether an alarm had been fitted .I am deeply shocked still and am still awaiting a reply from there underwriters ,I am still hopeful that they will see sense here and simply settle the claim , If they want the alarm stipulation to remain I am happy then to ask them to either provide me cover with this removed even if the premium rises or just cancel the policy and take my business elsewhere to a provider who will insure us without an alarm fitted .Thank's once more I will keep you all informed of developments ,fingers and toes crossed that a suitable and fair outcome can be made .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...