Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Crawfords Please read my story re Crawfords loss adjusters


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3803 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

As any body had the misfortune of dealing with Crawford Loss Adjusters?

 

This is my story so far.

 

1, on the 8th of February, the water tank in the loft burst causing extensive damage to bathrooms and 2 bedrooms.

 

2, We contacted our insurance Nationwide and home emergency call out which resulted in tap being capped and so we had no water in the house. Further the plumber believed that the ceilings had asbestos.

 

3, Our insurance company appointed Crawfords to handle the claim, a surveyor visited the property and access the damage caused.

 

4, On the 12th February, we were contact by ICAB telling us alternative accommodation has been arranged at a hotel for us all until buildings works are completed. We were happy that at last we will water to use and not have to buy gallons of bottled water.

 

5, My autistic son objected to the changes and found it difficult to cope then he took a shine to one of the waitress at the hotel and the he began to relax, my eldest daughter was in the middle of A level revisions and we had no internet access at the hotel. It would cost £14 per day, this made revision difficult and my 9 year old daughter just thought it was brilliant staying in the hotel!

 

6, A team of specialist came and remove the asbestos ceiling from all the rooms affected, the house now looks like a derelict building. Then nothing no more work was being done on the property.

 

7, There was not much contact between ourselves and Crawfords however ICAB was in regular contact with us. Crawford wanted end the accommodation even though there was no water in the house and ICAB even took it upon themselves to argue with Crawfords about extending our accommodation because the there was no running water.

 

8, By the 5th April I was getting concern that no works is being done on the house, I asked the man of the house to chase up and get things moving, but he found it difficult to deal with staff member who were being unhelpful.

 

9, I contacted Nationwide, they put me through to Crawfords but they not helpful eventually I was told to contact Home Emergency as they are dealing with the plumbing side of things. Home Emergency demanded payment of £325 for the plumber to come and fix the tank and I promptly made the payment.

 

10, The plumber attended the property on the 8th April, for some reason he was not happy to do the job, he spent over 2 hours on his mobile phone pacing angrily up and down the front of the house. He eventually came inside the house to start installing the tank.

 

11, It was getting late and so I took the kids back to the hotel around 8.30 pm living my husband in the house with the plumber.

 

12, I chased the builders and advised them that the tank had been fitted so they can come and do the building work. The builders confirmed they will start work on the 18th April. The plumber left the house in such a bad state and also managed to damage my carpets!

 

13, On the 11th April, ICAB informed me that Crawford are not willing to extend our stay in the hotel and are insisting we move back home. I explained the conditions to ICAB and they tried so hard to get Crawford to use their common sense but to no avail.

 

14, I contacted Crawford myself and basically told me they couldn’t careless what the condition of the house was, they have made a decision not to extent the accommodation and that was that.

 

15, I was shocked by their attitude, I just couldn’t believe it. I contacted Nationwide and explained the situation to them and also emailed photos of the state of the house. Nationwide agreed that the living condition was unacceptable and immediately extended our accommodation stay to the 15th April.

 

16, Then on the 15th April the Crawford ended the accommodation, and this time they was so rude and abrupt with me. They treated us like beggars and second class citizens. Their attitude was so unprofessional, and I have never experience such behaviour in my whole life before.

 

17, I told Crawford the house is still in the same state it was the previous week and it is about to get worse with the builders starting work soon, common sense dictates that if the house was not habitable the previous week and nothing has been since therefore it is still not habitable. Crawford then started telling lies that our accommodation ended on the 11th and it was not extended beyond that. I referred them to ICAB and Nationwide but they persisted and believing their lies.

 

18, I contacted the Nationwide to explain the situation, unfortunately the claim handler I spoke with was absolutely hopeless and became very arrogant and rude after speaking with Crawford. In fact she said her colleague was wrong by extending our accommodation the previous week. She went further to say that it was costing too much to put us in an alternative accommodation therefore we should go back home and live in the house as it is irrespective of our health and safety.

 

She then went on to say that I have a four bedroom house and I should therefore sleep in the other bedroom. I tried to explain the dynamics of our family to her and the reasons why it would be possible to share bed with a 15 year olds autistic boy, 17year old studying for her A levels, everybody needs their own beds and privacy, it fell on deaf ears.

 

 

I then asked that since we do not have bathroom to use what are suppose to do when nature calls, her reply was that we do need to use the toilet whilst works are being out! I was in such a shock that I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry. She further told me that should I need to use the toilet when the builders are working, I should go and ask the builder to use the toilet and the builders will let me know when I can use the toilet. I think at this point I ended the conversation as I had already spent the whole day on telephone with them.

 

I felt bullied, demean, degraded and at times felt I was being discriminated against. Surely no other customer is treated this way!

 

19, I put in a complaint straight away, which I was told would take so many weeks to be investigated, I had no choice but to sleep on an old sofa in the living and my autistic son also slept in another sofa downstairs. The discomfort was unbearable and was unable to sleep through the night. I received a letter from UK insurance in respect to the complaint with a cheque for £200 for the inconvenience. I thought what an insult, I contacted the complaint handler and insisted that he listen to the phone calls between myself and the claims handler.

 

20, On the 17th the builders started work and the house was a building site! Even the builders were shock to find us in the house and not an alternative accommodation. Eventually the builders and decorators finished by the 3rd May. The amount of dust and rubble was unbelievable. I spoke with the Nationwide and demanded a professional cleaning of the house. Rainbow international were sent to survey the cleaning on the 10th May. Rainbow international came on the 5th June to start cleaning the house and completed on 11th June. We then were able to move into the bedrooms and also to use the bathrooms. By now I have back ache from sleeping in the old uncomfortable sofa.

 

21, I was still haunted and in shock by the way I and my family had been treated and I was informed by a neighbour to contact the FOS. I am still suffering from back pain and treating it with heat patches

 

22, I received a call from UK Insurance complaint handler (let’s call her Vera) and she apologise for what had gone on. Vera informed me that Crawford will be sending me a cheque for £2160 for the disturbance caused.

Vera also told me the way the staff member spoke to me was unacceptable and feedback has been provided to prevent re occurrence.

 

23, I received a Cheque form UK Insurance for £2160 for disturbance, this cheque did not come from Crawford.

 

24, I called Vera and emailed her in respect my back pain, as I expect to be compensated for the pain I am suffering as a result of sleeping in the sofa for so long. Vera contacted me later and advise that since it was a personal injury I will therefore need to seek legal advice.

 

25, It is clear that the refusal to give us alternative accommodation was a dirty tactic used by Crawford and in doing so, have avoided paying the cost of accommodation which would have come to between £17000 - £25000!

 

26, I have written to Vera stating clearly that it is unfair and unjust for the Crawford/Insurance company should profit out of the unfair treatment we had received. Given that it would have cost them up to £25000 for the accommodation which we were rightly entitled to, therefore I seeking fair compensation from them and the £2160 isn’t fair amount.

 

Thank you all for reading this very long saga. I do wonder how many other families are going through this kind of treatment.

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome Fear no evil1,

 

I have moved this thread to the appropriate Forum, hopefully you will get some advice shortly.

 

Regards,

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to exhaust the Company's complaints procedure after which time you can go to the Insurance Ombudsman

 

Have you dealt with this situation on the telephone or by letter ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have 8 weeks to resolve a complaint - if it is longer than that and there appears to be no resolution, then I would suggest you write one last letter - ensure they understand that this is a Formal Complaint (send to their Head office), give them say 14 days to resolve things to your satisfaction if not, then start escalating your complaint to the Insurance ombudsman.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The behaviour of Crawfords loss adjusters is not acceptable, but they are simply the agents of Nationwide, employed to adminster the claim in line with the policy t&c's and to minimise the cost of the claim. What should have happened is there should have been an assessment of how long the repairs were going to take and what period alternative accommodation would be required. It is normally the case that you would be offered Hotel or B&B type accommodation for as long as needed to properly assess the damage, for you to sort out the plumbing issue and for the home to be made as habitable as possible. If the damage to the house was severe and needed many months of work, the Insurers would have rented another house for you.

 

The problem is in regard to alternative accommodation as set out below, is what is considered habitable. For a home to be habitable, it would have to have running water for health and hygiene requirements (drinking, washing & toilet). It would have to have sufficient space for your family to be able to sleep. It would have to have facilities for your family to be able to eat. It would have to be safe to live in. If there were occupants with disabilities, then this should have been subject to an assessment by Crawfords on behalf of your Insurers, as they have responsibilities under a normal duty of care to work with you, to ensure their safety.

 

Normally in these situations, the Insurers won't pay for alternative accommodation, beyond the point where these points are catered for. As soon as the house was made safe with the asbestos risk removed, the plumbing issue resolved with running water restored and there were rooms in the house that could be occupied, you would be expected to move back in. Even if this meant that you were living in one or two undamaged rooms of the house, while restoration work was being done elsewhere in the house, this is normally seen as acceptable.

 

In my opinion you were not entitled to alternative accommodation to the value of £17k to £20k, but simply to accommodations costs where the house was not fit for habitation by your family, taking what I have said above. I would have expected this to be no more than a couple of months accommodation, if the claim and renovations had been handled properly.

 

What needs to be addressed, is the sloppy handling of this claim by Crawfords and any risks/inconvenience that they caused as a result. You need to work with Nationwide to come to a resolution and if you are not able to, then I would suggest that you speak to a Solicitor to see what they say. I think going to the FOS may not be worth it, as they will take months (or years) and I think this will just prolong this unncessarliy.

 

Buildings cover

4

Alternative accommodation and rent If your home is not fit to be lived in as a result of damage for which a valid claim covered under Section 1 of the policy has been made, or it is occupied by squatters, the insurer

will pay:

a) providing the property is yourmain residence, the necessary cost of comparable alternative accommodation for you and your pets while your home is being repaired or

b) if you rent out your property, the amount of rent you would have received but have lost as a result of it being unoccupied because of the damage

c) the cost of up to 2 years ground rent which you are legally responsible for.

 

Contents Cover

6

Alternative accommodation and storageProviding you live in the property and your home is not fit to be lived in as a result of a valid claim made under part A of Section 2 the insurer will pay:

a) the necessary cost of comparable accommodation for you and yourpets whilst your home is being repaired

b) the necessary cost of temporarily storing your contentswhile your home is being repaired.The insurer

will not pay more than 30% of the ontents sum insured in total for any alternative accommodation and storage costs.

Edited by unclebulgaria67

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all so much for your response. I accept that we may not be entitled to an accommodation of £17k-£20k.. I based the calculations on the nightly cost that was being paid when we were in the hotel. I believe they should have rented a place for us especially given the fact that it was going to take so long to get the house in order and habitable again.

 

It is the point blank refusal to help us at all and that really saddens me. The builders would leave their tools in the rooms and warn me of the dangers and to keep the kids away. It was a complete nightmare.

 

And the fact that I was told I should not have the need to use the toilet whist in the house was just beyond me. I shall be patient and work with the Nationwide on this matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

We have had a real proplem with Crawfords, the person who came to our house, was very aggressive towards me, theatend me and my pregnant wife, saying that we were lying and alsorts, Mr X from Crawfords was so bad towards us, we made a complant against him,

 

people beware of Mr X, he lied to us about police report, and other things

Edited by ims21
Link to post
Share on other sites

You should make a formal complaint to your Insurers. They are responsible for the actions of the loss adjusters.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
You should make a formal complaint to your Insurers. They are responsible for the actions of the loss adjusters.

 

Absolutely put your complaint in writing to your Insurers. Get them to listen to any recordings and I am sure they will investigate fully. I do find Crawford very unprofessional, but after I made the complaint to my insurance company (chief executive), I noticed a very big change in their attitude towards me. I would go as far as to say they showed respect towards me whenever we spoke although their service is absolutely appalling. Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...