Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for your prompt reply. I have some questions, please: When you say nothing will happen, my 80 year-old mother is worried about potential DCA doorsteppers if/when the debts are sold on - she is a very sweet, quite vulnerable lady and she is worried she may be bullied and harrassed.  If they do come knocking, what should she say?  I told her to say she knows nothing about any of it and they have no right to come knocking on her door and to warn them police will be informed if they come back.  Problem is, I don't think she would be strong enough and can easily be bullied into saying more than she intended once the door has been answered. Next questions: 1)  Should I inform all my lenders that I have moved abroad before defaulting (to avoid the quirky English law loophole thingy that could end up in a CCJ or worse once a DCA gets hold of it)?  2)  Can/should I provide an alternative UK correspondence address to my lenders instead of my mother's home address e.g. my virtual office address for my business - would the lenders accept this as I live abroad now and don't live at my mother's address?  Can I just write and tell them, without any further ado and not get into any further questions about it and cease further correspondence with them and default?  And would this stop DCAs coming to my mother's house as it would not be my current residential address on the lenders files when passed to the DCA?  Do they doorstep previous addresses? 3)  If I don't provide a UK correspondence address will I be at risk of not being aware of any Letters of Claim etc and legal proceedings notices etc not reaching me (there's no reliable postal system in the developing country I've moved to).  Worried this would mean I could end up being taken to court without being aware of it and could end up in a worse situation. 2) What exactly will go on my credit file once I've defaulted, assuming no legal action is taken against me?    4) Should I contact any of my lenders and inform them I have zero assets.  TSB & Sainsburys already have I&E info from me which shows my income  @ £1200/mth is below the combined total of my debt repayments @ £1300/mth and that my income only just covers essential costs of living @ £1200/mth.  Could it be useful to be on my file that I have no assets, so that the DCA clearly see this when the debt is passed to them? Thanks again for any advice.
    • paypal, but i would like to know if anyone knows if there is a certain time limit they have to refund you? thanks
    • Dear lookinforinfo, I'm sorry if I seem stupid, but what exactly am I telling them? -what code/ law / standard have they broken that I will use as an argument in letter? I don't understand the premise of your argument.  I would appreciate it if you could explain it to me clearly and in simple terms so that I understand.  Thank you   
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Agreed, let them default. Keep everything in writing, if they ring to discuss the accounts over the phone, simply say 'everything in writing please', and hang up. They'll soon get the message. Get all of your paperwork in order too, if you haven't got any, or are missing relevant documents, then you can SAR the original creditor, which is free and they have 30 days to supply the info. Keep a diary of events too. sit back and relax, YOU'RE in control, not them.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowells chasing cancelled budget car ins 'debt’


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3951 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

this is my situation.

 

My wife received a letter from a DCA called ‘Lowell portfolio I’ claiming that a ‘debt’ from a motor insurance company (Budget) has been 'assigned' to them (Lowell). They state that my wife ‘owes' a sum just under £100.00.

 

The background is that my wife had motor insurance with Budget, but her car was scrapped in Sept 2011. She notified Budget of this by post, and stated that she would maintain the policy up until it’s expiry in March, 2012. (As the fee for cancellation was nearly as much as the remaining balance).

 

However, Budget rolled-over the direct debit, even though they had been explicitly told that she would not be renewing. (They have a habit of doing this, even doing it to my dead father!)

 

She didn’t notice the payment leaving her account until early this year. She cancelled the DD and we wrote to Budget explaining this.

 

We heard no more, until we got this letter from Lowell.

 

My wife sent Lowell an email explaining the circumstances:

Regarding your letter dated 10th July, your reference 130779036.

There seems to be a misunderstanding on the part of Budget insurance. I have not owned a car for over two years, and my motor insurance policy was allowed to run to its natural term, when it was cancelled.

 

I subsequently discovered that Budget continued to take payments from my bank account without my authority, so I cancelled the direct debit and notified them of this. I owe neither them nor you anything, indeed, they owe me money. I will not tolerate harassment or threats from you in this matter, and will immediately refer such to my solicitor.

 

If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.

 

As yet, they have not responded, but the letter from them, threatening to refer the matter to their recoveries business (Tocatto Ltd), has unnerved and upset her. Personally, I am always up for a fight with this type of organisation, but I hate to see my wife distressed.

 

What should I do next?

Any advice will be much appreciated.

SG

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tocatto IS lowlifes.

 

Lodge a formal complaint about them to the OFT & TS, exploiting a debtors lack of knowledge by using numerous trading names in order to confuse the debtor.

 

Ignore Lowlifes, and Red, and Hamptons illegal all of whom are Lowlifes.

 

Get back onto Budget and lodge a formal complaint with them demanding the reimbursement of the money they took, failure to do so WILL result in you taking legal action against them in the small claims court where they will be made to pay the full amount outstanding, plus interest accrued (at their rates) including costs.

The Customer Relations Manager

Budget Insurance

Fusion House

Bretton Way

Peterborough

PE3 8BG

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right,

now had an email from them:

Hello Mrs X,

 

 

 

Thanks for that.

 

 

 

I can that the outstanding balance relates to a Budget Car Insurance policy which was taken out for a ****** ****, registration **** ***.

 

 

 

Our records show that the last payment received towards the account was £17.99 on the 3rd of September 2012 and that the policy was cancelled on the 23rd of October 2012.

 

 

 

The outstanding balance comprises of an unpaid premium of £20.38 and a cancellation fee of £75.00.

 

 

 

I understand you are dispute regarding this account. The account is currently being managed on our behalf by Tocatto. In light of this I kindly request that you contact Tocatto directly with full details of your dispute using the following details:

 

 

 

Tocatto Ltd.

 

5 Fulwood Business Park

 

Caxton Road

 

Preston

 

PR2 9NZ

 

0844 815 0687

 

 

 

 

 

Once full details of your dispute have been provided to them, they will be able to investigate the matter thoroughly with BGL.

 

Any advice, please?

SG

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah the rather dubious cancellation fee...

 

urm....

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore the siririots deal DIRECT with budget ONLY.

 

If Budget don't want to know, then they clearly don't want your money, Tocatto/Lowell/red/Hamptons will have NO way of dealing with a dispute between you and budget, they have NO details or information to refer to, just ignore them.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm only threaten legal action if you are prepared to use it.

 

Exhausting their complaints procedure first is a definite, see what and where they decide to go with it.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowlifes are no better than what you might step in, lower than a snakes belly and just as sneaky with it.

Let them have both barrels then, Budget that is, don't bother wasting your time with the second rate Lowlifes, they can't read anyway...

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowlifes are no better than what you might step in, lower than a snakes belly and just as sneaky with it.

Let them have both barrels then, Budget that is, don't bother wasting your time with the second rate Lowlifes, they can't read anyway...

 

I know - the guy who wrote the email above is barely literate…:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...