Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, I'm wondering if someone can advise me on something. I'm appealing an order and have been asked to submit an appeal bundle and the below points are required to be included: 1) transcript of the judgment of the lower court on other record of reasons.  2) Statement of case. I'm wondering if anyone knows that "on other record of reasons" means. Also for statement of case would it just be a long document covering the reason for the claim, the findings of the lower court, why it was wrong and what I seek instead?   Thanks,
    • Hello, Thanks for the advice. I asserted my rights to reject and they accepted it and said they will refund me the full amount.  My question now is how long do they usually take to collect the vehicle? I've made it clear that I'm available for them to collect it whenever and I've been told its been passed on to the collections team. I chased it up today as its also raining heavily at the moment.  I just wondered if anyone had any experience on how long they usually take to collect? I'd obviously like it collected as soon as possible as I need to purchase another car.  Is it likely they will drag on the process of collection and what can I do if they do?  Thanks!
    • Why are FCA’s “name and shame” proposals causing a stir?View the full article
    • I am coming back to this thread after receiving a Single envelope containing 2 letters: 1 from Max Recovery telling me that my account was transferred to Drydens Fairfax in 2007 1 from Drydens Fairfax telling me that they are under instruction from their client to seek repayment.   These relate to a Barclays Overdraft from the early 00s, last payment through PayPlan was 04 June 2019, but neither of the letters are from Barclays themselves.   I have informed Drydens in both May 2019 and June 2023 of changes of address. No letters beyond a confirmation of the change and a request for finanical details have been received, which ive ignored.   What i was wanting to know is do i just ignore these as per previous advice? I know that i cant CCA an overdraft debt but what is the usual "plan" for dealing with old overdraft debts? Am i trying to run the clock down until June 2025 when it becomes statue barred?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Welcome finance/hagarty claim form with forced PPI***Claim Discontinued***


wasowski
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3728 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ok,

 

so in theory then If there is no default does that mean they can't ask the courts for a CCJ until the account has been defaulted?

 

Looking at the ICO guidelines it would appear (to me anyway) that Welcome are intentionally providing inaccurate information on the credit file

continuously as “the lender in a standard business relationship with the individual decides the relationship has broken down”

 

- which it clearly has since they have decided to send to collection agencies and take court action.

 

I say intentionally because the amount owed has recently jumped up by £1000 since the Solicitors fees were added 4 months ago after the amount having been the same for years

- and still no default has been recorded,

 

so they have obviously updated this themselves and its not some sort of repeat operation provided by a computer somewhere every month.

 

Does this then mean that if we can complain to the ICO about them?

 

and is it worth doing,

 

will it help at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

i'll let the legal ones ans the relevance of the no default etc.

 

it is worthy to note that welcome

or whomever are updating all cra files of people with pending court cases

to include costs & stat int claimed even Before they have won??

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

interesting.

 

I told you I tempted fate yesterday by updating this to say we haven't heard from them, BOOM, today a court letter has arrived with a court date of Nov 20th!

 

Can anyone advise of what we do now, there is very little information on the letter other than the date, time, the fee for Welcome to pay and that its been allocated to the small claims track.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

it is worthy to note that welcome

or whomever are updating all cra files of people with pending court cases

to include costs & stat int claimed even Before they have won??

 

dx

 

I thought they were quite presumptuous to add that too, surely that shouldn't be on there yet?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, today a letter came from Welcome stating that Hegarty was no longer their solicitor and they will be representing themselves.

 

Anyone got any clues as to what this means for us? Is it worth looking to pay a solicitor to help us?

Link to post
Share on other sites

otherway around me thinks

 

it means haggy have backed out, wonder why that is....:lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello!

 

Am wondering how to construct a defence for the court date in November, It would have to be a pretty simple affair as my husband will be attending alone and is not as 'up to speed' as I would like.

 

Do we concentrate on the dodgy signature or do we go for the mis-sold ppi?...or both? I can look back at old documents to provide proof that my husbands signature has never changed and does not look

 

anything like whats on the agreement, I can also go back through bank statements to show that he was working away on the date it was 'signed' but im not 100% sure if I can get a transaction for that date

 

that shows where he was.

 

The agreement was made over the phone, which is when they put (forced) the ppi on. Husband cant remember what the name of the person he spoke to was. We chose the car on a Sunday and provided all

the wageslips etc then but nothing was signed.

 

Still a bit lost as to where we go from here, any help is greatly appreciated! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update:

 

I just spent ages writing out all the who what and where for court and printing three copies of each document so I can send 1 to the courts and 1 to welcome, took me hours!

 

Anyway.. as part of the documents I included a screenshot which I took last night of the Experian credit report showing the history of '6' markers instead of a default, out of pure interest I went back to Experian today and ALL of the Welcome credit reporting has been removed and the credit rating has gone up significantly!!

 

I wonder if they were trying to remove the evidence before the court date? Too late for them if they are cos I already got the evidence lolololol!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick bit of help needed!

 

I am about to send everything to Welcome and the court, all the documents we intend to rely on and the defence, do I send a SIGNED copy of the defence to Welcome? I ask because I have included copies of husbands signature (official documents he has signed over the years including a tenancy agreement signed 2 months before the finance agreement was made) to show the difference between it and the signature on their agreement, so it would be very hard for them to 'lift' any signatures now seeing as the exact same copy is going to the court, he has already signed it but I can quickly print out another copy if anybody thinks it shouldnt be signed.

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You shouldnt need to submit a further copy of the defence if Northampton have already served one

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah ok well you can provide a copy with a statement of truth then.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, well its not headed as anything in particular, just really a written account of whats happened and pointing out the flaws in their paperwork with copies of all the things mentioned. Hope they accept it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Right, Paul is in court NOW with these effers, they are claiming they didnt get our docs which is cr*p as they were sent recorded delivery and signed for, they even sent back a letter saying tjanks for the compalint!! now their rep is saying she will get it struck out because Paul wont let her keep his docs!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, now we have to provide IND with a copy of our paperwork (again) because they claim that it has got lost in their internal mail. When Welcomes representative looked at our paperwork she even said there wasnt really much argument against it so why bother asking for an adjournment? SO peeved right now, I was hoping this would be over by now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They really are taking the mik, husband said thatb he could hear all the other Welcome cases going on around him, there were LOADS! He even heard another person who's docs had been lost in the post like ours were so its obviously something that happens a lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

BAAAAAHHHHHaaaahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just had a letter from Welcome with a cheque for over £600 enclosed, no idea what for, rang them...apparently there was a letter sent saying that we have overpaid our loan with them and this is the amount THEY owe US!

Needless to say, we have requested a new copy of the letter...thankyou very much! :) :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...