Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA Help


1882ian
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3944 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I’m looking for some advice for my wife with her claim.

Some back ground information, she was a nurse and damagedher back when a patient fell on her in 1980 since then she has been in and outof work until 1995. She has been claiming incapacity benefit since then, whenshe had to give up work permanently. In 2012 she was told to report to the jobcentre plus. She was interviewed there and was told that she shouldn’t havereported to the job centre. He gave her the form to appeal, she filled them inand sent them off. She had a reply saying it was being referred to a tribunal. Sheis still waiting for a date. In the mean time she has been told that her benefitwill be stopped from September.

Any help and advice much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you say she was given a form to appeal what was this appeal for?

 

was she transferred from incapacity benefit to ESA?

 

Here's my guess - she was transferred from IB to ESA and placed in the WRAG without a medical. She was asked to attend a Work Focused Interview at the Jobcentre, where the adviser felt that she was not really fit to carry out work-related activity and so gave her the appeal form to ask to be placed in the Support Group where these interviews are not required. She's on contribution based ESA (as she transferred from IB) and that's why she's being told her payments will stop in September - because her 365 days on ESA© will exhaust then.

 

OP, does that sound about right? Could you provide us with as much information as you can figure out?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My wife applied for disability living allowance in April2009 she was assisted with the form filling by the CAB

She had a medical 19 April 2010 on the 27 April shereceived a letter from DWP stating she was not entitled to DLA and how theyreached their decision.

CAB told my wife she should appeal 6/5/2010 sent off anappeal received a reply 16/7/2010 stating the decision is upheld.

On the 10th August she received a letter from ATOSwith an appointment for another medical on the 30th August.

No other correspondence until she received a letter fromthe job centre plus stating that she had been put on the WRAG group 13/09/2012and they would wright to her with a date for an interview.

Interviewed on 31/10/2012. The guy she saw said she shouldn’tbe in the WRAG she should have been put in the Support group. He asked here whyshe hadn’t appealed. Her reply was that she had not received any other correspondence.

He gave her a reconsideration and appeal process leafletto complete a GL24 form. She sent that off same day 31/10/2012. Nothing back tosay they had received her form.

Next letter dated 14/2/2012 saying the enclosed theappeal papers these papers give the reason for our decision. We have sent a copyof the same information and your appeal letter to the tribunal service they willget in touch with you to explain what happens next with the appeal.

She has spoken with the CAB 7/3/2013 and they haveadvised her that she is to inform them of a tribunal date. If that takes 18 monthdoes that mean she will be without any money?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So worst case after 365 day no money loses appeal no more money or is there anything she can do?

 

If the above senario happens your wife can make a new claim for Esa providing 6 months have passed since the original decision, she will need to provide fit notes from her GP, she will be put onto the assessment rate of Esa about £72 per week, alternativly she may be entitled to Income Based Esa if she meets the criteria once her Contribution Esa stops in September. She will receive a letter from Dwp closer to the date to inform her of this, if she meets the criteria there will be no break in payments, payments remain at the same rate as she receives now, My payments stopped last November, been without any income ever since because my hubby works more than 24hrs per week, I did not meet the criteria for Income Based Esa, Won my Tribunal beginning of May, placed into Support Group and now waiting for my payments to be reinstated and any back payments they owe me.

Edited by swinginapig
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Was a bit concerned about how long thing were taking and mywife would have to have her money stopped till the out come of the tribunal, asthey stated that they would not have to deal with my wife till mid-October. If shewon then back dated is no consolation, spoke to our local MP within a couple ofdays she has now received a date for the hearing. Could be a coincidence? Will keepyou informed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...