Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3926 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So even if you live hundreds of miles away, you have to apply to PATAS and go down to London? I would be surprised if that is the case, but I don't know.
PATAS deal with appeals for contraventions in all London boroughs regardless where the driver lives. The alternative to travelling to Islington for a personal hearing is to opt for a postal hearing.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

hi

did not mention the building number as i had already posted the letter.

the cctv was a camera held by someone in a car behind me in the passengers seat by the look of the photos.

I will read the form to see if you can appeal by post otherwise i might aswell pay it as i am not going to London = cost of fuel , parking etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Being bl***y awkward as I am (and I have done this kind of thing before successfully) I would write back yet again and say that I do intend to appeal to PATAS and I would like the CCTV footage, and I would also like them to explain to me how I am supposed to check parking restrictions on a post on the side of the road without stopping. Are they suggesting I should drive my car without looking forward and looking to the side? I would say that surely this would be a dangerous way to drive. Are they saying that this is the correct way to check parking signs? Tell them their response will be included in the appeal to PATAS.

 

This might not be the way you are supposed to do it, I appreciate. I am only saying what has worked for me by which I mean continuing to argue even when they've told me I can't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why? What's wrong with a postal hearing?

 

Because you have a better chance to explain yourself if you can appear personally, and the cost of travel will probably put people off.

 

If they have any questions you are there to answer them at a personal hearing. I doubt if they go into extended correspondence on small points if you aren't there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just been looking into the use of cameras for enforcement, they should only be used if its not practical to use wardens.

this was a high st area with wardens present as i saw them when i found a valid bay to park in around the corner.

Also it says that signs should be displayed indicating the use of cameras , not sure if there was any, does anyone live around the wimbledon area and know if there is signage on the village high st

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can stop to read the signs but the Council are not going to tell you that which is another reason to contest the PCN at PATAS the fact that they have put the wrong location only adds to your appeal. I would also add the camera evidence is defective as it has two times on it the tenths of a second is different making the evidence unreliable.

 

2nbt5jd.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is Wimbledon village, I appealed on the basis you need to get out of the vehicle first to see the signs, I am in the drivers seat in the pictures.

They rejected it saying its the vehicle they are intrested in and not the driver which they did not see come out

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is Wimbledon village, I appealed on the basis you need to get out of the vehicle first to see the signs, I am in the drivers seat in the pictures.

They rejected it saying its the vehicle they are intrested in and not the driver which they did not see come out

 

They didn't see you come out because they, apparently, only filmed you for two minutes or less because the parking ticket only refers to parking there for two minutes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

yes if you could check as its another thing to add

 

so far my objections are:-

1) time index on screen does not match picture

2) The Secretary of State recommends that approved devices are used only where

enforcement is difficult or sensitive and CEO enforcement is not practical. CCTV

should therefore only be used :

• In areas of low compliance

• For situations impractical to serve a PCN on foot eg. No stopping restrictions

• In areas patrolling on foot may endanger the H&S of staff in this case a warden should only be used

3)CCTV should only be used when a regulation 9 PCN cannot be safely or practically

served, not out of convenience.

CCTV must NOT be used in permit or Pay and Display bays

where i had stopped these were pay and display bays all be it only at certain times of the day

4) location is wrong , shop number and general discription

5) my main point once i had got out and read the pay and display sign i moved,if a warden had approached they would ask you to move as per there guidlines

Edited by unimatrix1066
extra info the pictures also show a sign as required by there guidlines stating the parking hours, this cannot be read in the
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...