Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I imagine the letter that the security guards talked about will be a letter from a company or lawyers who specialise in trying to extract money from shoplifters. I think Sainsbury's use DWF solicitors, otherwise it could be a company like RLP. It won't be a 'fine', only the police can do that. Look at this as a parallel 'justice' system that doesn't involve the plice. If you read around the forum for other cases of shoplifting, you'll get the idea of how this all works. If you think your behaviour has become compulsive, we suggest having a chat with your GP who should get you help for this. Best, HB
    • despite our wettest 18 months on record,  Low levels of rain and snow have cut Canada’s hydropower production, forcing it to increase electricity imports from the U.S.   - NYT
    • Hi all…. i was wondering if someone could help me. I am ashamed I have been caught shoplifting from Sainsbury’s by two undercover security guards who I suspect have been following me for a week now… I have been impulsively shoplifting due to what I think could have become an addiction of some kind. I am ashamed of what I had been doing and I do believe being caught has been for the greater good. i was taken to a room and asked to empty my bag, the guards were slightly rude but I complied with them politely as I know they are just doing their job and I am in the wrong. They retrieved my address, name, birthdate and took a photo of me, they asked me how many times I had shoplifted and I said twice and I didn’t want to be foolish and say just once. They issued me a letter of ban from the store and if I was caught in the store again the police would be called. They told me I would be paying 2x what I had stolen today as the goods had been damage which I am guessing is stole around £65 worth roughly. I did offer to pay for the items I had stolen on the day but they declined. They did not call the police but let me leave after claiming I was a lucky person. They told me to expect a letter in the post and that I “would be smart not to ignore it”  what should I be expecting in the post from them? I am aware from reading a lot online about security costs.. people mentioned to ignore these costs however as I had damaged the labelling on the goods should I still comply and pay the fines ?  kind regards awful shoplifter
    • If you're sat there wondering how to attract and retain young talent, look no further. Find out what young people want from employers.View the full article
    • Toyota has apologised for providing incorrect or manipulated data for safety certification tests.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

use of cctv car around school areas **All PCNs Revoked**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4021 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Obviously this depends on the size and layout of the school. We drive round the car park to the stopping zone (two cars) and hand our children over to the teachers, or collect them there at the end of the day. Then continue round and go out. You don't have to use the car park but I usually do because it's less hassle than getting a ticket even if the school will appeal for you. You are all moving in the same direction and as they see you in the queue your child is lined up and ready to jump in at the stopping zone and nowhere else. You are not allowed to park. The teachers are on a rota for car park duty, and only have to do it for half an hour once or twice a month so it's not too bad for them either.

 

This is unfortunately this end of the school has no vehicle access - it has steps that lead down to the school playground.

The front of the school is even worse for parking!

Walking any distance also causes me problems - I rarely do this school run as another mum picks up for me - I have a son at a school the other side of town! On the odd occasion I do need to collect both children, I need to get away as quickly as possible so my son isn't left standing around on his own for too long waiting for us :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Obviously this depends on the size and layout of the school. We drive round the car park to the stopping zone (two cars) and hand our children over to the teachers, or collect them there at the end of the day. Then continue round and go out. You don't have to use the car park but I usually do because it's less hassle than getting a ticket even if the school will appeal for you. You are all moving in the same direction and as they see you in the queue your child is lined up and ready to jump in at the stopping zone and nowhere else. You are not allowed to park. The teachers are on a rota for car park duty, and only have to do it for half an hour once or twice a month so it's not too bad for them either.

 

This is unfortunately this end of the school has no vehicle access - it has steps that lead down to the school playground.

The front of the school is even worse for parking!

Walking any distance also causes me problems - I rarely do this school run as another mum picks up for me - I have a son at a school the other side of town! On the odd occasion I do need to collect both children, I need to get away as quickly as possible so my son isn't left standing around on his own for too long waiting for us :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but where does it say Violet "repeatedly did it too even after being told by the ceo"? I thought the first she knew of the PCNs was when she received them in the post. I didn't see anywhere that she'd already been told by a ceo not to park there.

 

Thank you Daniella - I did indeed state that all 3 tickets arrived well after all 3 'contraventions'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just looked at your photographs, and I just don't see where you are supposed to park. It's a great pity the school can't get agreement from the small number of residents for cars to enter the school grounds, drop off their children and exit. That would be a lot less chaotic than people having to park on yellow lines.

 

Jamberson says above that you can stop to let out a passenger and escort them into a building, but does that also work if you park your car to enter a building and collect a passenger? :???:

 

Either way, I think this needs to go back to the local parking control, not PATAS.

 

The area where only residents can drive is for the safety of the children. Its basically a huge 'safe' area for the children to come out of school and be met by their parents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask what the contravention was as stated on the tickets? Your OP mentions 'stopping' rather than 'waiting'. This suggests that it is not a SYL offence.

 

Hi.

The notice reads:

"Parked or loading/unloading in a restricted street where waiting and loading/unloading restrictions are in force"

 

I'm just going back to what it says on the notice, but Jamberson has said you can drop off a passenger and escort them into a building if you park on a yellow line, and we're waiting for him to come back to see if picking up a passenger is also allowed.

 

The restrictions are clearly aimed at parents picking up their children because of the time restrictions. Where does the Council suggest you park?

 

There are two questions here: What are you going to do about the tickets, and secondly what to do in the future.

 

I'd appeal the tickets on the basis that they are apparently discretionary - some cars get them, but others parked at the same time do not - and cannot be so, and all the other points you have quoted, and I'd ask the school what their view is. I'm just going to have another look at the photo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Presumably there are other parents who have been caught too?

 

The only way I can see round this is for the children to be lined up behind the barrier, and for those picking them up to drive up to the double stop lines and then go, kind of, straight across/turning to the right and stop for about 30 seconds for your child(ren) to jump in. If you all move up in a queue at the same time then I can't see that you are stopping or parking. The school needs to be involved here and the teachers will have to do pick up duty. If they get walkie-talkies then one teacher can be round the corner seeing the cars arrive, take the names and call them through, and the second teacher can shout for the children to come to the front of the queue.

 

I'm curious as to why there is only a restriction in the afternoon. Why isn't there a restriction for morning drop off if it is all about child safety?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only way I can see round this is for the parents to queue, not stopping but moving slowly to the double stop lines, going straight across, kind of, and then turning right and stopping for about 30 seconds while their child/children get in. The school needs to have the children behind the barriers, and two teachers need walkie-talkies. One teacher is on the road where parents join the queue and they take the names and call them through to the second teacher, at the barrier, who calls the children to the front.

 

If the queue gets too long and isn't moving then parents will have to go round the triangle.

 

I am curious as to why there are only restrictions in the afternoon. Why not for the time of morning drop off if this is all about child safety?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd appeal the tickets on the basis that they are apparently discretionary - some cars get them, but others parked at the same time do not - and cannot be so,

 

The OP has already appealed and had his appeal rejected. If he appeals again it will mean forfeiting the discount, and effectively appealing double the charge. And if he appeals on the grounds you suggest, then he is 99 percent sure to lose and end up doubling his problem.

 

There is a possible route regarding escorting the passenger, but it's up to him to open up on that, describe what was happening on the day, and how long he was parked for etc. On the points he's raised so far, it's a losing hand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I'm just going back to what it says on the notice, but Jamberson has said you can drop off a passenger and escort them into a building if you park on a yellow line, and we're waiting for him to come back to see if picking up a passenger is also allowed.

 

The restrictions are clearly aimed at parents picking up their children because of the time restrictions. Where does the Council suggest you park?

 

There are two questions here: What are you going to do about the tickets, and secondly what to do in the future.

 

I'd appeal the tickets on the basis that they are apparently discretionary - some cars get them, but others parked at the same time do not - and cannot be so, and all the other points you have quoted, and I'd ask the school what their view is. I'm just going to have another look at the photo.

 

 

There are restrictions in the morning as well. The times are 8am-10am and 2pm-4pm.

I think I have said already, I do not understand the 2-4 timing, as school finishes at 3.30pm, and after school clubs finish at 4.30pm. If it is really about child safety, why isn't the afternoon restriction 3pm to 5pm?

The tickets - I have already started the ball rolling to go to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal. I believe the reduced ticket fee has to also be offered at the end of the Tribunal hearing if unsuccessful.

In the future - I will need to leave work even earlier so that I can bag the closest 'allowed' parking spot to the school! - I'll end up having to be there well before 3pm!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I'm just going back to what it says on the notice, but Jamberson has said you can drop off a passenger and escort them into a building if you park on a yellow line, and we're waiting for him to come back to see if picking up a passenger is also allowed.

 

The restrictions are clearly aimed at parents picking up their children because of the time restrictions. Where does the Council suggest you park?

 

There are two questions here: What are you going to do about the tickets, and secondly what to do in the future.

 

I'd appeal the tickets on the basis that they are apparently discretionary - some cars get them, but others parked at the same time do not - and cannot be so, and all the other points you have quoted, and I'd ask the school what their view is. I'm just going to have another look at the photo.

 

 

This is a very good point - I hadn't thought of it as 'discretionary' - But you are right!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just noticed - all 3 PCNs state I was parked on the long straight road!

The little triangle bit is actually part of the other road leading up to it - according to Google maps and RAC .

I'm guessing this may well be significant?!?!?! :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just noticed - all 3 PCNs state I was parked on the long straight road!

The little triangle bit is actually part of the other road leading up to it - according to Google maps and RAC .

I'm guessing this may well be significant?!?!?! :|

 

and the main doc of the rejection letter from the council has the wrong car registration number on it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are restrictions in the morning as well. The times are 8am-10am and 2pm-4pm.

I think I have said already, I do not understand the 2-4 timing, as school finishes at 3.30pm, and after school clubs finish at 4.30pm. If it is really about child safety, why isn't the afternoon restriction 3pm to 5pm?

The tickets - I have already started the ball rolling to go to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal. I believe the reduced ticket fee has to also be offered at the end of the Tribunal hearing if unsuccessful.

In the future - I will need to leave work even earlier so that I can bag the closest 'allowed' parking spot to the school! - I'll end up having to be there well before 3pm!!!!

 

That's not the case - they will usually require you to pay the flat rate of the PCN. Any discount is just to encourage prompt payment and once it expires it's gone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just noticed - all 3 PCNs state I was parked on the long straight road!

The little triangle bit is actually part of the other road leading up to it - according to Google maps and RAC .

I'm guessing this may well be significant?!?!?! :|

 

In that case, you can ask your local council to tell you precisely what the official name of the road is where you parked. If they tell you something other than what is on the PCN, you have a line of appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe PATAS is for London area only.

Please correct me if I am wrong :)

 

Here is the one for other areas;

 

http://www.trafficpenaltytribunal.gov.uk/site/index.php

 

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek face to face professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...