Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have also found this:  D.2 Service of a PCN by post: 54) There are some circumstances in which a PCN (under Regulation 10) may be served by post: 1) where the contravention has been detected on the basis of evidence from an approved device (approved devices may only be used in limited circumstances) 2) if the CEO has been prevented, for example by force, threats of force, obstruction or violence, from serving the PCN either by affixing it to the vehicle or by giving it to the person who appears to be in charge of that vehicle 3) if the CEO had started to issue the PCN but did not have enough time to finish or serve it before the vehicle was driven away and would otherwise have to write off or cancel the PCN 55) In any of these circumstances a PCN is served by post to the owner and also acts as the NtO. The Secretary of State recommends that postal PCNs should be sent within 14 days of the contravention. Legislation states that postal PCNs must be sent within 28 days, unless otherwise stated in the Regulations. This from London Councils Code of Practice on Civil Parking Enforcement.  The question is what is an approved device? Certainly, he had the opportunity to place the ticket on my car and I didn't drive away.  I looked further and it seems that an approved device is a CCTV camera - It seems that the photos taken were not actual film but images and it is not clear if they are taken from a video or are stills. I'm guessing if it was moving images then the SAR would have stated this.    From the Borough of Hounslow website: "There are two types of PCN issued under the Traffic Management Act 2004, which governs parking contraventions. The first is served on-street by a Civil Enforcement Officer, who will observe a vehicle and collect evidence before serving the PCN either by placing it in a plastic wallet under the windscreen wiper, or by handing it to the driver. The second is a PCN served by post, based on CCTV footage taken by an approved device, which has been reviewed by a trained CCTV Operator."   From Legislation.gov.uk regarding approved devices: Approved Devices 4.  A device is an approved device for the purposes of these Regulations if it is of a type which has been certified by the Secretary of State as one which meets requirements specified in Schedule 1. SCHEDULE 1Specified requirements for approved devices 1.  The device must include a camera which is— (a)securely mounted on a vehicle, a building, a post or other structure, (b)mounted in such a position that vehicles in relation to which relevant road traffic contraventions are being committed can be surveyed by it, (c)connected by secure data links to a recording system, and (d)capable of producing in one or more pictures, a legible image or images of the vehicle in relation to which a relevant road traffic contravention was committed which show its registration mark and enough of its location to show the circumstances of the contravention. 2.  The device must include a recording system in which— (a)recordings are made automatically of the output from the camera or cameras surveying the vehicle and the place where a contravention is occurring, (b)there is used a secure and reliable recording method that records at a minimum rate of 5 frames per second, (c)each frame of all captured images is timed (in hours, minutes and seconds), dated and sequentially numbered automatically by means of a visual counter, and (d)where the device does not occupy a fixed location, it records the location from which it is being operated. 3.  The device and visual counter must— (a)be synchronised with a suitably independent national standard clock; and (b)be accurate within plus or minus 10 seconds over a 14-day period and re-synchronised to the suitably independent national standard clock at least once during that period. 4.  Where the device includes a facility to print a still image, that image when printed must be endorsed with the time and date when the frame was captured and its unique number. 5.  Where the device can record spoken words or other audio data simultaneously with visual images, the device must include a means of verifying that, in any recording produced by it, the sound track is correctly synchronised with the visual image.
    • Hearing took place today.  Case dismissed with costs awarded. Neither UKPC or a representative turned up.  Apparently they messaged the court on 7 May asking for their case to be considered on paper.  Never informed me, which was criticised by the judge as not following procedure.  I was really annoyed as I would have preferred for the case to be thrown out before the hearing, or at least face them in court and see them squeal.   They are just playing a numbers game and hope you blink 1st!   Ended up having to change my flight, but  the costs awarded softens the blow. Was asked to confirm it was my signature on both the witness statement and supplementary statement.  Wasn't asked to read them, said she could see my arguments made and the signs were insufficient and no contract formed. Took maybe 10 mins in total.  Judge did most of the talking and was best for me just to keep quiet or confirm any statements made. Happy to have won as a matter of principle and have costs awarded. Maybe not worth all the time and hassle for any newbies or the technologically challenged.  But if you are stubborn like me and willing to put in the time and effort, you can beat these vultures! I big shout out to everyone who helped on the thread with their advice and guidance, special mention to FTMDave, thank you sir!  Really appreciate everyone's efforts. All the best!
    • I plan to be honest to avoid any further trouble, tell them that the name should be changed to my official name
    • There is no evidence that I was issued a PCN that was placed on the car and removed. It seems that I was issued a £60 PCN on the 8th of March (the parking date) but it was never placed on my car, instead,  they allege that they posted the PCN on the 13th of March and deemed delivered on the 15th. I never got this 1st £60 PCN demand. I only know about all of this through the SAR. I only received the second PCN demanding £100, which was deemed delivered on 16/04/2024 - that is 39 days after the parking incident.  I did a little research and "Legislation states that postal PCNs must be sent within 28 days, unless otherwise stated in the Regulations." as per London Councils Code of Practice on Civil Parking Enforcement.  The main issue is that I was not aware of the 1st £60 PCN as I didn't receive it - I'm not sure how this relates to the 28-day rule because that rule applies to the initial £60 PCN. PCM could say that "we sent him the letter by post and it was deemed delivered on the 15th of March" therefore the 28-day rule does not apply.  As regards the safety of the parking attendant, that is clearly something he chose to feel and he made the decision that his safety was threatened - I didn't even see him or had any interaction with him. I'm nearly 50 and I definitely don't look aggressive 😊  
    • okay will do. I'll let you know if anything transpires but once again - many thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest - Red Drving School


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4082 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Cag's

 

I will try to keep this brief but could do with a little crumb of comfort in our house tonight.

 

My wife applied for one of these driver instructor courses which was RED Driving School.

 

Below is a brief timeline.

 

  • Went to find about a driving instructor course in 2007, filled out some forms.
  • I then didn't take the course due medical reasons, the course was cancelled with Red in Wimbledon
  • One year later £179.00 was taken from my account, got in touch with RED and they agreed to take no more money
  • I heard no more untill 2011 when Capquest contacted me requestiing £7000 for a driving course not even taken
  • Capquest had taken a CCJ agaisnt me, so wrote to Capquest explaining the situation & received more threatning letters from Capquest
  • Applied to the court to have CCJ removed and case to heard at court
  • Went to Croydon County Court in November and judge was sympathetic towards my case and questioned Capquests conduct and advised to me to put in my own witness statement
  • Another date was set for 11th March 2013
  • This judge gave me 3 minutes of his time, did not listen to my point of view & told me it was my signature on the credit agreement and I was liable to pay all court cost's and interest over 5 years
  • Red Driving School have received this money, I did not not knowingly sign & credit agreement or receive any money or do the course

 

So what are our options now? Can't afford to pay this debt, don't think we should bearing mind we have not even had the course, not like we have had a car or something.

 

Think we have been very let down by the judge today.

 

Any help would be of a great help to us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you appeal the recent hearing? Did you submit a request for an extended time? Some judges sadly dont care about debtors and just want to rubber stamp the documents on as many forms as possible purely to get the max money in for the least work. The same happened to me years ago with 2 CCJ's.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you appeal the recent hearing? Did you submit a request for an extended time? Some judges sadly dont care about debtors and just want to rubber stamp the documents on as many forms as possible purely to get the max money in for the least work. The same happened to me years ago with 2 CCJ's.

 

Yes we did the extended time and took it to court, can we appeal the court judgment from today?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You entered into a contract and unless it was cancelled within 7 days or the time stated on the contract (if longer) you are liable to pay the full amount. Have you got a copy of the original agreement and what does it say about being unable to take the course due to ill health? Can you get anything in writing to support you were unfit at the time.? What was said in the phone call following the deduction of £179 a year later?

Did you submit a statement as instructed by the judge? Red Driving School may have been mistaken to pass this 'debt' onto Capquest. Did you not hear from Capquest before they got a CCJ against you?

 

You have a limited time to appeal this judgement so get that in and your case together. I think that only one payment was deducted from you a year after the event gives some credence that the company came to some kind of agreement with you. If you can show the call took place from a phone bill it may be you can argue there was an oral agreement not to proceed, if that was the case. Was there a time limit in which to take this course?

In CC cases the judges that hear the Case Management Directions are not necessarily the same ones that hear the final case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read that Red Driving School do not run their own courses. They contract you to a driving instructor company near to you and it may be the case that Red have had to pay this driving instructor company, even though you did not attend.

 

You need to appeal this and find out what costs Red did incur, as a result of the course being cancelled. I think you may be wise to get a solicitor to act for you.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read that Red Driving School do not run their own courses. They contract you to a driving instructor company near to you and it may be the case that Red have had to pay this driving instructor company, even though you did not attend.

 

You need to appeal this and find out what costs Red did incur, as a result of the course being cancelled. I think you may be wise to get a solicitor to act for you.

 

How much and how do we appeal?

 

Is there a means test to say how much my wife can pay, if not successful?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a lot of unanswered questions in the background to this case such as how did you end up with a CCJ in the first place without defending it? Did you put a schedule of income and outgoings this time around for the court to consider? Section 52 of the CPR (Civil Procedure Rules)on the ministry of Justice website deals with appeals but you would definitely benefit from speaking to a lawyer and may get help through Citizens advice. You do have to put your appeal in fairly promptly. It is possible now that having failed to overturn the CCJ the Capquest may go back to court to get an enforcement order against you and at this time you can put in a schedule of your income and outgoings for consideration and an offer to pay in instalments. You should have supporting evidence for your income/outgoing schedule for the judge to consider. You can make 'instalment payments' into the court and then when Capquest go for an enforcement order these will be deducted from any order the court should make but it does indicate a desire to comply with the order and may make the judge more include to issue an instalment order. You can't appeal just to get an instalment order and as I understand it, in an appeal if you have already made any payments into the court this cannot be mentioned in the appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many Thanks

 

When my wife got the CCJ she gave it to me where I paid £80 to have it set aside, in those forms we put down her income, around £250-£300 per month. Capquest then provided loads of letters which they claim to have sent her making various offers to pay the debt (we never never seen them at all until copies provided). That's when we got the CCJ. The debt is 6 years old in June does that help her in any way?

 

What type of enforcement action could they take?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 6 years makes no odds, as they have a CCJ.

 

If you want to fight this, then see a Solicitor. They charge about £175 per hour, but you may get a free half hour consultation to see whether it is worth challenging the CCJ or not. Sometimes Solicitors are available at CAB.

 

If you don't want to fight this for whatever reasons, then you will have to enter into repayment. Make an offer of repayment of x per month. If they reject it, then you can ask the court to set the repayments. If you don't make payments, they can then instruct bailiffs or even upgrade to HCEO's for a debt that is over £600.

 

http://www.trustonline.org.uk/understand-judgments-fines/enforcing-judgments

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try this for online help. It is a new government online legal advice service.

 

https://claonlineadvice.justice.gov.uk/

 

If you do a Google search for community legal advice, you may find a legal advice centre near to you. You may even get some help with how to appeal.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The six years doesn't help you here. Capquest is a debt recovery company and it would appear that they have been sold your debt by Red Driving School. Your debt was incurred in 2007 and Capquest took action for recovery in 2011. The six years statute barred rule is if not action whatsoever has been taken to recover the debt for that time but as you will see from many postings on consumer forum that debt recovery companies will still try to bully people into paying the debt and through subterfuge have even managed to get court orders issued after the statute bar. This is a common complaint where people are saying they never received anything from the company in relation to the debt but in the case if it going to court it is the court's responsibility to send out documents to you when a claim is lodged for you to respond to. If you have moved since the contract was signed for the Red Driving Course then that could be the answer. If not check with the court for where they claim they sent the papers to you in relation to responding to the initial claim, court directions and advising of court dates. Request a copy of the original Capquest claim you are entitled to have it. It's not just the Capquest paperwork that has gone astray here it is all the communication from the court. If Capquest provided the wrong contact details to the court you may have another appeal point here. I doubt the court will accept that all their paperwork went astray too. It is considered to be your responsibility to advise on change of addresses to your creditors however if following your phone calls with Red following your illness you understood the matter to be closed. Oral agreements, if you can show the balance of probability was what you said in your discussion with Red Driving School was what happened then this matter shouldn't be being pursued. That is why I suggested if you could find an itemised phone bill around the time you claim the call was made to Red advising them of your illness and that you wouldn't be able to attend the course and they agreed to that there is no other evidence to refute. I believe it would require a witness statement from someone in Red who dealt with the matter to say otherwise. Also I asked what the contract says about illness if you are physically unable to take the course due to illness. A letter from your doctor to say that you were ill at this time and unfit to undertake this course would be helpful if you visited them and/or your employer if you were off work at the same time. These are all matters which the court has not heard and so can be appeal points. I don't know your case well enough but I would start with the contract to see what provision it made for being unable to take the course through ill health. I would also ask the court to check the address which was given presumably by Capquest as your address for paperwork and was anything sent out registered post. If the wrong address or an old address is on the original CCJ paperwork that would be another point for appeal. If an old address then you could argue that you had no obligation to notify Red Driving School as they had agreed to you cancel the contract when you contacted them. That they only took one payment from you bank account lends support to this. If you haven't changed address then I cannot think of why you received nothing from either Capquest or the Court and I doubt a court would on the balance of probability believe that you didn't receive letters from either source but just in case I might check with the post office to see if they had any complaints of mail not being delivered in your neighbourhood at the time. It has been known for the odd rogue postman to dump letters rather than deliver them rare but it can happen. Is there the possibility due to illness you couldn't cope and didn't open them which might be an explanation but not one a court I believe would be sympathetic with unless the illness had been very serious.

 

Once a CCJ has been issued if the monies are not forthcoming Capquest can return to court for an enforcement order. Usually this would be for the order to be enforced by court bailiffs who would look to recover the debt. There are different enforcement orders which include putting a charge on your property if there is equity in it and forcing a sale or coming to your vehicle or other possession to the value of the debt. You should be notified of this event so you can put your offer forward if this happens but given you haven't anything upto now, I would send a registered letter to the court to be put on file with your full contact details advising that in this eventuality you wish to be notified of the hearing so you may attend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will see if we can get a solicitor but as you say expensive.

 

If she only gets around £250-£300 a month what would be a reasonable repayment offer, or just make an offer and see if they accept? I don't think there is anything worth 7k plus in the house. we have car worth about 5k but I am thinking off putting that in my name.

 

I understand that they can put a charge on the house and take the money when it's sold? Is that an offer we can make.

 

My wife and I are not together at this moment so the money she gets is important to her for food and clothes etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can show on the balance or probabilities that Red agreed orally to the cancellation of this contract then it follows that they were mistaken in selling the debt onwards to Capquest as it is not owed and it is a matter for Capquest to take up with them. A point for appeal can be evidence that the court has not seen or heard. Again see S52 CPR guidance on the MOJ site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will see if we can get a solicitor but as you say expensive.

 

If she only gets around £250-£300 a month what would be a reasonable repayment offer, or just make an offer and see if they accept? I don't think there is anything worth 7k plus in the house. we have car worth about 5k but I am thinking off putting that in my name.

 

I understand that they can put a charge on the house and take the money when it's sold? Is that an offer we can make.

 

My wife and I are not together at this moment so the money she gets is important to her for food and clothes etc.

 

Why not see whether Community Legal Advice can help or not. There are many legal advice centres around the country. It might not cost too much to make an appeal. I believe that the amount claimed by CapQuest should have been disputed, as Red driving school would not have made a loss for whole cost of the course. This should have been defended at the time, by asking Red to account for their losses by providing paperwork to confirm their actual losses.

 

She needs to get legal advice, otherwise I can see CapQuest going back to court and you will have bailiffs at the door. If there is a car on the driveway, they will apply a levy on it and argue about ownership afterwards.

 

I understand that your current position is difficult with separation, but if this is not dealt with now, it will only get worse.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

They don't put a charge on you house for when you sell it, they will force a sale not wait to you want to sell and it may mean that you will not get the full market value for it. On enforcement they realise they may not get the full debt but they want as much as they can get. Transferring assets into someone else's name is a common tactic but one the court is very much alert to and one they would take a very dim view of. ie The bailiffs will probably take the car whether it's in your name or her name. There will be a record or registered owners at DVLA. The court would want to see a proper account of income and outgoings for you to come up with a reasonable amount. The income seems low but to do this exercise properly I believe would have to show joint income and outgoings. ie Utilities, credit card payments, car payments, council tax, fares to and from work etc and from what is left make a reasonable offer this is where CAB and you community legal advice will be able to help as well as with your appeal. Don't look at worse case scenario here because if you can make a reasonable offer which is supported by evidence the court will be looking for ways to make instalment payments work without recourse to the more drastic means of recovery. The offer shouldn't be a guesstimate of what they might accept it needs to be worked out on what you can reasonably afford.

 

I agree with Uncle Bulgaria you should go and get advice to help you prepare properly to get your payment options considered and for advice on appealing against the decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They won't force the sale of a house. The charge is put on the house and you may have to enter into a repayment arrangement. If you then don't make the repayments, they may apply to the court for the house to be sold, but this is very unlikely.

 

The chances are that the first option will be bailiffs and if that does not work, they will go back to the court for other options.

 

Anyway, just make sure that she obtains legal advice urgently and that an appeal is entered or an affordable repayment offer is made

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...