Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
    • IMG_2820-IMG_2820-merged.pdfmerged.pdf Case management was this morning. Here is the Sheriff’s order. Moved case forward to 24/05.   He said there was no signed agreement and after a bit of “erm, erm, yeah but, erm” when he asked them, he allowed time for sol to contact claimant.  what is the next step now? thank you UCM  
    • I've had a quick (well, quick for a thread of this length),  read of this thread and to be honest I'm struggling to make heads nor tails of the actual crux of the issue here. You seem awfully convinced that whatever is going on is worth the fight and the odds are in your favour but with how the thread has gone it seems that one trail goes cold so you simply move on to another in an attempt to delay the inevitable. All it does is end up digging holes and confusing others and yourself which means any advice given to you is completely pointless. I note that for the life of this thread there has not been any documentation or correspondence uploaded for people to have a look. Have you got any that you'd be willing to redact and upload for members to assist you? Right now, it seems people are shooting out advice while being in the dark because it's starting to become very difficult for people who weren't here at the start of this (including myself) to follow along. Right now, this whole thread is just hypothetical "He said, she said" and is going nowhere fast. Nothing more than basic advice can be given which, as you've sought out some legal advice, is likely not sufficient to actually come to any sort of conclusion. I, personally, am starting to agree with others that it may be best to consider bankruptcy and put the matter behind you.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Income support + Carers?


Merker
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4058 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey guys... so here my situation.

 

Mother is terminally ill and has been claiming middle rate DLA for years. My grandmother had been doing most of the caring for my mum previously (she had her pension so was not able to claim CA) since I was working until August last year (left my job back then)

 

I was then on the sick and claiming ESA until the start of Feb this year. As soon as I had recovered, my DR stopped giving me sicknotes and I had warnings off the ESA department saying my money will be stopped if I don't send them more sicknotes (I didnt send anymore sicknotes and thus assumed the claim was closed).

 

That was until the infamous ATOS got in touch about my assessment. They booked me in for it in a weeks time and the letter actually threatened me claiming "if you do not attend your ESA payments will be stopped".... What payments? My payments had already stopped weeks before. I'm not even bothering to cancel my appointment with them, they can pull in their dr's and nurses and sit waiting for me and waste their time just like they would have done with me if I was still ill, getting signed off by my DR and actually attended.

 

Right back on topic.

 

I put in an application for carers allowance now. I thought about it and even when I was on ESA I was still helping out with my mum for 35 hours or more per week and now i'm better and not receiving ESA I am caring for her more often.

 

I was told by some friends about a possibility of income support to go with it? I did tick on my CA form about IS but since I gathered they wouldnt be about in their department at weekends I have decided to phone them on Monday morning and apply.

 

 

Just wondering if this is correct and I will get IS as well as CA and if so how much will I get per week in total? (Not on any other income, not in employment and have no savings or cash of any sort to my name). Also regarding backdating... I requested the CA to be backdated from the date my final DR's note for my ESA claim ran out. Would I be able to do the same with IS and request backdating from the same date?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you can claim IS if you are in receipt of CA for someone. Your CA would be deducted from the IS, but you would also be entitled to the IS Carer's Premium, so you would be better off.

 

IS can be backdated for up to three months (or to the date you first satisfied the conditions of entitlement, whichever is later), but you must explain why you did not claim earlier and a Decision Maker will look at the circumstances and decide whether you have shown "Good Cause" (GC) for a late claim. Note that "I didn't know I could claim" is not usually accepted as GC, but if you were misinformed by a DWP officer about your entitlement or you have some other reason for the delay it may be OK.

 

I believe you can claim IS while you are waiting for a decision about your CA, but I'm not 100% sure about this.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.

 

I guess it may be difficult to backdate my IS from the sounds of that. I guess it was almost like "I dont know" as back at the start of Feb when my ESA payments were stopped, I didn't know that would be when the DR would stop giving me sicknotes (1 visit I was given a sicknote, the next a few weeks later I was better and didnt need 1 according to them). Then the ESA people only told me about going on Jobseekers, since my fit for work form only gave me the option of saying I was fit for work and was claiming JSA or that I wasnt given a DR's note but still consider myself unfit for work

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does sound a bit unfortunate the way it has worked out. The thing to remember is that Jobcentre staff aren't benefit advisers as such - they're only trained on one benefit, usually, and it's up to you to figure out what's available. If the person who mentioned JSA had no idea you were a carer for someone on DLA they would have had no reason to think you might be entitled to IS and CA.

 

Of course, you could always ask for a backdate. They might well say no, but all you'd lose is the time taken to complete the relevant form.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would recommend calling the contact centre tomorrow morning 0800 0556688 to make a claim for IS, you can state that you would like to request the claim is taken from the date you applied for carers allowance as you were not advised to claim at the same time and that due to caring for your Mum you had not applied at the same time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been a few problems with my claim...

 

They send letters back saying my grandmother has "underlying entitlement" to carers allowance. Strange because she told me she has never applied for it before as she was told she wouldnt get it due to her pension.

 

She gets paid something like £177 per week (Which shows on her statement as DWP pension credit or something like that).

 

I have no idea how it will work out now, is £177 per week the normal for a pension? Would it mean if I sent back the forms and put myself as person to be claiming carers allowance that she would lose money?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

£177 is quite a lot for just basic pension, my dad is 82 and gets £147.40 a week (he also gets an occupational pension and isn't entitled to any enhancements). Perhaps your grandmother gets guaranteed pension credit which ensures she has a specific level of income each week.

 

Feebee_71

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys, well it could be 147. I only glanced at her statement a while back.

 

She did say she had a pension form with her name and new pension rates for april and it didnt say anything about carers allowance on it, just pension credit.

 

I know whatever the amount is, its over £100 a week thus wouldnt that mean no carers allowance top ups would be paid as you have to be on £100 or less a week to get carers allowance?

 

edit:

 

just seen her total amount from april is £180.67 per week

 

something like £120 for pension

then an extra £60 for state pension credit

Edited by Merker
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahhh I see, how much would that premium be that she could be getting?

 

Basically I know a few years back my grandmother spoke to a social worker who told her she would not get anything for carers allowance so she never actually applied.

 

Just strange that she had a letter as well as me saying that they know she has an "underlying entitlement" and that her pension paid is that high per week. Typical of the DWP they didnt actually give amounts she was getting.

 

Trying to work it out because if she will lose £60 a week and I will be paid £60 a week, its hardly worth me becoming the named carer as I could let her continue getting that money and go on jobseekers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only one person can be registered as a carer so if your grandmother is down as your mum's carer then you need to discuss things with her. She may not be getting carer's allowance but she could be getting the 'underlying entitlement' and any premiums linked with that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, yea she is down as a carer from what the forms said (underlying entitlement) but wondering how much that is per week? so we can work out if its worth me going on it (like if I got paid more than what she gets for this "underlying entitlement", then it would be worth me claiming it instead). It doesnt say on any forms how much that would be and on her pension form it doesnt mention the underlying entitlement or carers premium

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, she isnt getting housing benefit or anything like since she owns the house outright.

 

Im guessing that £60 pension credit must be made up of pension credit + carers premium to top it up, meaning she cant get more than £30 a week for underlying entitlement.

 

So if I was to claim both CA and IS.... that would give me just over £100 a week and I could do a £30 weekly food shop for her or something like that out of my cash so she isnt losing out.

 

 

 

Edit:

 

Just rechecked her pension info form and it says she gets "Pension Credit guarantee credit" so that must top it up somewhat

Edited by Merker
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...