Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism in these circumstances  to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know. Just a tip - if you are offered a fixed penalty be sure to submit your driving licence details as instructed. I've seen lots of instances where a driver has not done this. There will be no reminder and no second chance; your £100 will be refunded and the police will prosecute you through the courts.
    • Looks similar to you original email to their Complaints team. I dont rate copypasta for a CEO complaint. Rewrite it with emotion involved as to how badly this is affecting you and make them feel embarrassed for their actions... 
    • Well, not quite the trouncing they deserve, and Andy Street suffering - despite distancing himself from the poops and being a good mayor (and despite the rather ridiculous muslim voter labour boycott across regions - did they really want the tories to stay in power?) - But not bad at all The Reformatory goons managed two council seats didn't it - out of over 300 they tried for ..     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ATOS Medical hell


phillyg
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3863 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had my appeal tribunal today and had it refused. Will be appealing this decision today. I have already asked for a statement of reasons behind the decision. I have also issued a 14 day notice on Atos pending legal action.

 

I am so sorry to hear of your tribunal decision. I am sure everybody on the forum wishes you luck with with both your appeal and legal action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

: phillyg:

 

Got a bit confused earlier in this saga. Putting Atos to one side for a moment, were you in receipt of employment n support with the work related activity component and pursuing an appeal for the support component?

 

Doesn't matter whether a decision about limited capability for work/work related activity is made by a Jobcentreplus decision maker or a tribunal panel. All such decisions are made in accordance with the limitations caused by the claimant's condition(s) and the legislation in force on the date of the determination by Jobcentreplus.

 

Regs in force last October/November were;

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2011/228/made

 

For an award of the support component you needed to meet one of the schedule 3 descriptors. It's not clear whether you argued that your subsequent diagnosis was affecting continence at the time of your work capability assessment. If you did and the tribunal disregarded it, the statement of reasons should say why.

 

Some initial guidance as to errors or can be found at;

 

http://www.disabilityrightsuk.org/appealing-upper-tribunal-against-first-tier-tribunal-decision

 

Should you feel that your condition has deteriorated since last year you can apply to Jobcentreplus for a new decision (supersession) about your limited capability for work related activity. Instead of, or as well as, considering further appeal.

 

What are you hoping to gain from your legal action against Atos?

 

Best wishes with whatever you decide to do next, Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to bring justice against Atos Healthcare for the treatment that they are bringing to thousands of people within the uk who are being denied benefits of which they are more than entitled to. To add insult it would seem my DLA decision has been made on Tuesday to remove my high rate mobility and middle rate care as from next year. It just gets better. Losing the will to fight but one must carry on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

: phillyg:

 

Well, I applaud your sentiments if you've the energy and financial resources to keep going. Whilst I wouldn't want to tread on your solicitor's toes my experience of complaints to Atos is that they're hard work for little, if any, reward. Starryeyes got them to admit mistakes with basic anatomy and misinterpretation of mental health descriptors. But she didn't get so much as an apology, not even when her subsequent tribunal was upheld. Doesn't mean Atos are off the hook though. A self-help group that I'm part of are as politically active as we can be.

 

Is your disability living a routine renewal at the end of a fixed award? If so, the onus is on disability n carers to show, on a balance of probability, that you need less care and less help with getting around. However, given your recent knock back, you'll need to judge the pros and cons of further appeal at the moment. Risk the awards you've got or wait until you're reassessed for personal independence:?:

 

Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

: phillyg:

 

Well, I applaud your sentiments if you've the energy and financial resources to keep going. Whilst I wouldn't want to tread on your solicitor's toes my experience of complaints to Atos is that they're hard work for little, if any, reward. Starryeyes got them to admit mistakes with basic anatomy and misinterpretation of mental health descriptors. But she didn't get so much as an apology, not even when her subsequent tribunal was upheld. Doesn't mean Atos are off the hook though. A self-help group that I'm part of are as politically active as we can be.

 

Is your disability living a routine renewal at the end of a fixed award? If so, the onus is on disability n carers to show, on a balance of probability, that you need less care and less help with getting around. However, given your recent knock back, you'll need to judge the pros and cons of further appeal at the moment. Risk the awards you've got or wait until you're reassessed for personal independence:?:

 

Margaret.

 

sorry if I have not been clear. I was awarded high rate mobility and middle rate care in 2012 and it was till 2014,that was the award.

 

I had to fill out the form that they ask you to fill out. I called today and they said that after my claim ends in January 2014 my claim will be ended as it has been disallowed by the decision maker!

 

I am waiting for the letter to confirm this. She said I will be able to ask for a reconsideration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Margaret I did not get the point you made of risking my award as they are taking it away in January anyway? I think im going to need some advice very soon as this really is getting on top of me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

: phillyg:

 

Wasn't clear whether you'd been awarded lower components of disability living.

 

As you say, if disability n carers have terminated your award completely you've nothing to lose by appealing their decision. You'd have to be ultra unlucky for an appeal to a disability living tribunal to affect your employment n support. But when you get it, you should check the judge's statement of reasons for inconsistencies between the decision about your employment n support and your grounds of appeal for disability living.

 

In my opinion it's not worth asking for a reconsideration. Until the law changes later this month, a formal written appeal via letter or GL24 form automatically includes a reconsideration by a different decision maker.

 

What's welfare rights like in your area? If you can find it, some professional advice may help you to cope.

 

:hug:Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know what is going on with the welfare system in this country anymore. I have been more than cooperative with the DWP by keeping them informed of my health situation and feel that it is all for nothing. When I first claimed esa it was because I was sacked from work due to capacity as I was unable to work. It turned out I was sacked unfairly.

 

I was then told by the dwp I was fit for work. Obviously I appealed that decision. I was then placed in the support group and had been for three years until the medical with atos.

 

Not at any point was I told what had changed or what they thought had changed. I have spent the last 4 and a half years more or less begging for a benefit that I am entitled to. It sickens me to the core.

 

I have severe constant back pain. I have burning feet numbness from waist down awaiting Emg. I have severe leg tremors of which affects my walking causing further pain to the back. The tremors in my legs make me feel as though I have walked miles as the muscles continue to contract viciously. On top of this I have the lazy bladder with the inability to feel when I need to go. Then there is the diagnosis of panic disorder with agoraphobia along with depressive disorder.

 

I just can't win whatever I do im made to feel like crap.

 

The funny thing is the dwp have been repaid every benefit I have had because of my ongoing pi claim due to my accident.

 

Very annoyed and very upset.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes and the tribunal judge and doctor said because I can handle an appointment with doctors etc then I am able to engage in work related activities. I said the doctor's appointments are to try and enable me to be pain free of which im not. But they are there to help me find diagnosis and treatment.

 

They went on to say because I can attend my sons parents evening this also makes me capable.

 

I mean what is all this about? They asked me how I handle changes to my routine? I swear and I get angry I throw things and punch walls when times get hard. What did they want me to say?? did they want me to say I want to kill people and cause damage to property???

 

Absolute monsters. Next time maybe I need to throw the tribunal bundle and ask her if that is enough for you!!

 

Come on im not bonkers im human at the end of the day yet they seem to think someone who suffers constant pain,someone who pi###s themself is an idiot.

 

Have some dignity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok here is an update. Received letter from DLA stating I need help with nothing!! States I dont suffer panic and anxiety although a psychological report handed to them a mere couple of weeks ago states depressive disorder with agoraphobia and panic disorder!!! States I have no walking issues although I have sent them a neurologist letter stating a severe disability with leg tremor. Then it goes on to say I have no issues with bladder although I wet myself. I states I can cook and wash even though I can't get in the bath and wash dry and dress lower torso as I can't bend.

 

Another letter arrived from atos with an offer of consolatory payment as an apology without prejudice. Should I accept?

 

Help!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes and the tribunal judge and doctor said because I can handle an appointment with doctors etc then I am able to engage in work related activities. I said the doctor's appointments are to try and enable me to be pain free of which im not. But they are there to help me find diagnosis and treatment.

 

But generally, you know the doctor well enough and you generally have little / no choice to attend doctors appointments. I don't think I know anyone who has doctors appointments most weeks either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

: phillyg:

 

'...... was I told what had changed ......'

 

The significant change was when Government moved the goalposts closer together in March 11. :evil::evil: Then added a few extra hoops earlier this year. :evil: Employment n support allowance is about how well one can perform, or not, prescribed activities that are relevant to any workplace. Very little to do with diagnosis and nothing to do with specialist opinion or capability for a particular job. The current very harsh criteria for an award of employment n support with the support component can be found at;

 

http://www.direct.gov.uk/prod_consum_dg/groups/dg_digitalassets/@dg/@en/@disabled/documents/digitalasset/dg_177366.pdf

(pages 10 -12 and 25 -27)

 

From a tribunal's viewpoint, the continence descriptor usually needs confirmation from a doctor or continence nurse. Doctors and hospital appointments don't count as social engagements but answering the phone, children's activities and shopping do. And yes, if there's a next time describe exactly what happens when an unexpected change causes a panic attack or unacceptable behaviour.

 

The disallowance of your disability living sounds like computer generated pages of text. Did you have an Atos assessment? Or did they ask your doctor for a report? Start your appeal by keeping a diary of exactly what help you need, why and how often. Also, a statement from a carer often helps.

 

That consolatory offer from Atos:?: Think you have to be realistic about what you can get from them and whether you can cope with further aggro. We've another contributor to CAG who's been playing letter tennis for over a year.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?337937-IB-to-ESA-migration

 

Sincerely, Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

: phillyg:

 

'...... was I told what had changed ......'

 

The significant change was when Government moved the goalposts closer together in March 11. :evil::evil: Then added a few extra hoops earlier this year. :evil: Employment n support allowance is about how well one can perform, or not, prescribed activities that are relevant to any workplace. Very little to do with diagnosis and nothing to do with specialist opinion or capability for a particular job. The current very harsh criteria for an award of employment n support with the support component can be found at;

 

http://www.direct.gov.uk/prod_consum_dg/groups/dg_digitalassets/@dg/@en/@disabled/documents/digitalasset/dg_177366.pdf

(pages 10 -12 and 25 -27)

 

From a tribunal's viewpoint, the continence descriptor usually needs confirmation from a doctor or continence nurse. Doctors and hospital appointments don't count as social engagements but answering the phone, children's activities and shopping do. And yes, if there's a next time describe exactly what happens when an unexpected change causes a panic attack or unacceptable behaviour.

 

The disallowance of your disability living sounds like computer generated pages of text. Did you have an Atos assessment? Or did they ask your doctor for a report? Start your appeal by keeping a diary of exactly what help you need, why and how often. Also, a statement from a carer often helps.

 

That consolatory offer from Atos:?: Think you have to be realistic about what you can get from them and whether you can cope with further aggro. We've another contributor to CAG who's been playing letter tennis for over a year.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?337937-IB-to-ESA-migration

 

Sincerely, Margaret.

 

 

Many thanks for responses. Margaret I never had an assessment but I think my gp was asked for a report. The funny thing is all my appointments have mostly been with other specialists so he really would not know much. I only really see the gp when I need more meds.

 

The atos offer was a couple of hundred. This was without an involvement of a solicitor. I think I will throw the towel in on this one.

 

I have enough to deal with especially with the atos appeal and the esa appeal to the upper tribunal once I have received the statement of reasons.

 

I will just wait and see what response I get to esa50 I had to fill out.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

: phillyg:

 

'...... was I told what had changed ......'

 

The significant change was when Government moved the goalposts closer together in March 11. :evil::evil: Then added a few extra hoops earlier this year. :evil: Employment n support allowance is about how well one can perform, or not, prescribed activities that are relevant to any workplace. Very little to do with diagnosis and nothing to do with specialist opinion or capability for a particular job. The current very harsh criteria for an award of employment n support with the support component can be found at;

 

http://www.direct.gov.uk/prod_consum_dg/groups/dg_digitalassets/@dg/@en/@disabled/documents/digitalasset/dg_177366.pdf

(pages 10 -12 and 25 -27)

 

From a tribunal's viewpoint, the continence descriptor usually needs confirmation from a doctor or continence nurse. Doctors and hospital appointments don't count as social engagements but answering the phone, children's activities and shopping do. And yes, if there's a next time describe exactly what happens when an unexpected change causes a panic attack or unacceptable behaviour.

 

The disallowance of your disability living sounds like computer generated pages of text. Did you have an Atos assessment? Or did they ask your doctor for a report? Start your appeal by keeping a diary of exactly what help you need, why and how often. Also, a statement from a carer often helps.

 

That consolatory offer from Atos:?: Think you have to be realistic about what you can get from them and whether you can cope with further aggro. We've another contributor to CAG who's been playing letter tennis for over a year.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?337937-IB-to-ESA-migration

 

Sincerely, Margaret.

 

Margaret there is something playing on my mind as it is now 1.30am and I can't sleep worried about everything that has gone on over the last few months.

 

I received a letter from the DLA dated 29th September stating they have looked at my claim after myself asking for a reconsideration. I did not ask for a reconsideration I just sent in medical reports for their records.

 

The letter stated that my claim from 2012 to 2014 remains the same. So in other words the decision was to keep me at higher rate mobility and middle rate care.

 

Then a few days later I received the decision on my renewal to remove the benefit in its entirety!

 

This does not make sense. So in September they agree that I am entitled but as soon as January 2014 arrives im no longer entitled. Surely if this was the case then they would remove my claim now if they presume I have no problems?

 

Does this make sense to you or anyone else reading this post?

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

: phillyg:

 

'...... but I think my gp was asked for a report.' And almost certainly that's the problem, especially if s/he isn't your principal healthcare professional. Many general practitioners simply don't know what their patient's care needs are, or whether their mobility's improved since the accident that triggered an initial claim for disability living.

 

Get as much medical confirmation of your conditions as you can. Either direct from the specialist or via a subject access request to your general practitioner. A tenner gets copies of everything that's on the computer. Reactions from your specialists will vary but you've nothing to lose by asking for letters to support your claim.

 

Use a separate sheet, or several, for section 8 of a GL24 to explain that;

 

Cos of a spinal injury you need help to shower and dress.

 

Cos of agoraphobia you can't use public transport without a chaperone.

 

Or whatever, with examples (if you've got them) of what happened last time you tried to go it alone. Keep a diary, as it happens, of the help you need for seven days.

 

Good luck, Margaret. :panda:

 

Best guess is that disability n carers treated your updated medical evidence as a request for a new decision (supersession) about your entitlement to the higher rate care component, and rejected it. Before a different decision maker considered your renewal application. Or they've got themselves as confused as you are. Only way you're going to know for sure is to contact them. If whoever answers the phone seems equally unsure, ask for a call back from a decision maker.

 

You can't do anything until Monday, so here's some :flock:, Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...