Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My HSBC Debts and a CCJ


Guest purplemushroomfairy2
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3185 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest purplemushroomfairy2

Hi I sent a CCA request in 2008. They initially repiled three months later saying that they did not have one. The debt has been in dispute since 2008.

 

Last week they wrote returning two cheques that had been cashed saying that they 'do not apply s 78 to overdrafts' they are reuesting that I provide them with the legal reason why they cannot demand payment.

 

So I ask again - do agreed overdrafts come under s74 of the Consumer credit Act? If so is there a template?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest purplemushroomfairy2

OK, I have just found this on the OFT website. Am I right in thinking that whether they decide to take notice of the CCA request according to the OFT overdrafts are now covered. READ and let me know please,

 

Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), Financial Services and Market Act 2000 ('FSMA') and Payment Services Regulations 2009 ('PSRs')

As of 1 November 2009 payment services will be subject to a single regulatory regime - the Payment Services Regulations 2009 (PSRs). The PSRs are designed to harmonise the standards of customer service for all payment transactions throughout the European Union. This changes the existing arrangements for banking regulation.

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) will be the new regulator for most aspects of the regime, taking over all retail banking conduct regulation for deposit taking and payment services. The FSA has drawn up Banking Conduct of Business rules and these will sit alongside the PSRs.

However, areas of retail banking which fall outside of the FSA's remit, such as overdrafts and credit card lending, will continue to be regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has a duty to license and regulate businesses involved in consumer credit activities provided that they satisfy the OFT they are fit to hold a licence. As well as retaining responsibility for the CCA areas, the OFT will also have responsibility for Part 8 of the PSRs which deals with competition issues relating to access to payment systems.

 

As a result of these changes the OFT and the FSA have agreed a concordat between the two organisations which sets out our division of responsibilities and how we will co-ordinate our work and ensure effective and consistent delivery of consumer protection in this are

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
Guest purplemushroomfairy2

Hello,

In 2005 our business went under .

We have been fighting various debts and repossession for 10 years now.

In 2006 marlin bought some if my HSBC debts. They were all put in dispute because no CCA, one sadly turned into a CCJ despite paying it but we sorted that three years ago.

 

HSBC had agreed to a full and final settlement and to reclaim all disputed debts that they shouldn't have sold on.

They didn't even though they made nefarious promises to marlin to pay them 8K.

As a result we weren't able to remortgage because they refused to keep to the agreement .

Long story short, HSBC changed solicitors last year to Eversheds who have been horrendous and won't consider the previous agreement,

My credit file is now clean and all of the old debts are now statute barred.

I received a letter from moor croft on Saturday giving me 10 days to give them the name of my new solicitors??

They are still trying to get the money for a debt that is now statute barred and has not been paid for 7 years.

I really don't even want to contact them again as I can't have the six years starting again.

Actually feel that by now we should have been sorted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Guest purplemushroomfairy2

Hi,

I have an alleged debt (overdraft) with MCE PORTFOLIO formally MARLIN.

 

 

I have written every letter I can,

placed it in dispute in 2008,

it became statute barred in 2014.

 

They have been arguing the overdrafts don't fall under the consumer credit act,

I found part that said they do.

Company have never had CCA and the original creditor claimed it on court back in 2010.

 

Thought it had gone away,

but today recieved letter informing me they were going to get a CCJ,

despite no payment plan ever being entered into and it's been in dispute for 8 years and it's statute barred .

 

Obviously I am worried , the letter took 7 days to arrive and I am off tomorrow for a fortnight .

 

I emailed them from a new email statements to the effect of ,no alleged debt, alleged debt in dispute , statute barred, harrassment etc etc

 

I have tried so many things , but they are like a dog with a bone and keep coming back!!

 

Any advice great fully received

Link to post
Share on other sites

They do fall under the Consumer Credit Act... BUT they are not subject to CCA Requests.

If it does go to court and it is deffo SB, then it's a complete defence.

 

Dont play letter tennis with them.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Company have never had CCA and the original creditor claimed it on court back in 2010"

 

we need to know what happened with the court?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

numerous threads merged yet again.

 

 

every so often the OP decides to start a new thread on one of the debts.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers I'd be ignoring them until/unless they issue a claimform.

 

 

then it will be easy to kill it with the SB defence.

 

 

its better sometimes to not enter into endless letter tennis with them.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

poss looks like was stayed? and claimant now thinking of lifting to try obtain judgment?

overdrafts after feb 11 are subject to s61b con credit act agreement requirements. before then, no cca only the oft determination re o/d's.

statute bar re o/d's cld be difficult as current a/cs can run on until called in. depends on the full circumstances/terms.

anyway, op is away for a couple of weeks. update awaited on return. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...