TK Maxx LARGE Civil Recovery RLP Claim. Im Scared help me :(

[jay_gee]

 

That is par for the course with RLP's communications. Whether they are simply stupid, or doing it deliberately is a moot point, but I suspect it is a combination of both.

We have seen this sort of intimidatory behaviour by RLP in the past. If anyone needed evidence that they are bullies, this is it.

 

The point they make is utterly specious, of course. You aren't divulging any details of your identity here. You do, though, have a legitimate concern that they may break the law and divulge confidential data.

 

All bullies behave the way they do because of inadequacy; in the case of RLP, they realise that their claims are at best on shaky legal grounds. As for whomever wrote that letter for RLP (and I could take an educated guess as to who it is), she demonstrates fundamental signs of a bullying personality - a deluded sense of her own grandeur and importance, and a sense of invincibility. You see, bullies don't think that anyone should challenge their actions or what they say - nor do they like being held accountable. What you've done, by asking a question that they find awkward to answer, is to highlight the bullying, inadequate personalities at RLP. Rather than responding properly and professionally to your point, they seek to criticise and intimidate you. Another classic sign is that she never knows when to stop, but again it isn't clear whether the cause is greed, stupidity or a combination of both.

 

There was a time when I thought that RLP's primary motivation was simply money, and I think that is still largely true. However, in the cases that come to CAG, I think the money becomes secondary. The primary driving factor becomes a need to show that RLP are cleverer than CAG, and it's a powerful factor - despite being bested over and over again, RLP keep coming back for more. These silly letters that try to intimidate on the basis of RLP following threads on CAG really highlight how much we get to them, which is great.

 

 

RLP know perfectly well that where you seek advice is entirely a matter for you. Their opinion on the subject is wholly irrelevant. Personally I'd ignore their latest missive, and laugh at the miserably inadequate personailities behind it, but be ready to complain to ICO if RLP are stupid enough to breach the DPA.

 

i have to say, the letter i received was one of the smuggest inaccurate things i have ever read.

[jay_gee]

i didnt write the large account above either, not sure why its got my name to it?

[honeybee13]

i didnt write the large account above either, not sure why its got my name to it?

 

Hello there. Did you press Reply with Quote to your own post #26? Post 27 has your name on it at the top so is unlikely to be anyone else.

 

My best, HB

[jay_gee]

Hello there. Did you press Reply with Quote to your own post #26? Post 27 has your name on it at the top so is unlikely to be anyone else.

 

My best, HB

 

The post at 14:20 was not made by me.

Though it has a small quote from the post I did make, which has disapeared !

[citizenB]

The post at 14:20 was not made by me.

Though it has a small quote from the post I did make, which has disapeared !

 

Will see if webmaster can work out what has happened

[jay_gee]

i have had a friends mother read over the reply letter i got, (she is an ex solicitor) and she thinks the letter is nasty, spiteful and unprofessional. though she has never heard of RLP so wasnt much help.

i rang the courts, and they said not to give any information to them about my court fee's, if RLP want the info then they would have to call them themselves and explain.

its all so confusing

[AndyOrch]

i have had a friends mother read over the reply letter i got, (she is an ex solicitor) and she thinks the letter is nasty, spiteful and unprofessional. though she has never heard of RLP so wasnt much help.

i rang the courts, and they said not to give any information to them about my court fee's, if RLP want the info then they would have to call them themselves and explain.

 

its all so confusing

 

Which they cant has they are not party to the proceedings.

 

Regards

 

Andy

[Sidewinder]

"Nasty, Spiteful and Unprofessional" Would make a good mission statement for them.

[renegadeimp]

I'm VERY surprised they even continue to operate. Especially after the Oxford case. It could be a reason why they now tell DCA's to go after a non existent debt.

[ScarletPimpernel]

i have had a friends mother read over the reply letter i got, (she is an ex solicitor) and she thinks the letter is nasty, spiteful and unprofessional. though she has never heard of RLP so wasnt much help.

i rang the courts, and they said not to give any information to them about my court fee's, if RLP want the info then they would have to call them themselves and explain.

its all so confusing

 

It's really quite simple if you sit down and think about it. You were dealt with by the court, which is the appropriate authority. The matter is finished. RLP, rather pompously, like to think of themselves as some sort of parallel legal system; they aren't. They have no legal authority. All they can do is send out letters of the sort your friend's mother accurately described as nasty, spiteful and unprofessional.

 

The best thing, if you have denied liability to them, is to ignore them - let them send their silly, impotent letters, and have a laugh at the sort of inadequate personalities behind them.

[Crazy Diamond]

@ Jay_gee, any chance of posting a copy of that letter on the forum? Sounds like a right laugh, I'd love to see that!

[citizenB]

@ Jay_gee, any chance of posting a copy of that letter on the forum? Sounds like a right laugh, I'd love to see that!

 

If you are able to do this, JG, then please make sure you edit any personal information and also any letter references and barcodes !

 

Follow instructions below.

 

Dx100 – Instructions on uploading pdfs

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets

as a picture file

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc using paint

but leave all figures and dates.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

or ir you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

the hit reply button

[old bill]

I see Wacky Jacky & Co are behaving like idiots yet again. If the courts have ordered the OP to do something, RLP CANNOT subvert or override the court's instructions and neither should TK Maxx be allowing RLP to do so. If RLP continue to send letters, it might be an idea to go back to the court and alert them as to what is going on. I cannot see the judge being a happy bunny. In fact, the judge is likely to be an absolutely furious bunny when they find out what has been going on. If RLP and TK Maxx need a judicial smack in the mouth, so be it, but RLP should, really, keep their noses out of it and TK Maxx should not be encouraging them.

[renegadeimp]

Chances are tk maxx have no knowledge of what RLP are doing.

[old bill]

Chances are tk maxx have no knowledge of what RLP are doing.

 

I doubt very much a court would see it that way. RLP have the OP's details and are referring to the incident, so TK Maxx have clearly supplied the OP's details to RLP. Ignorance is not bliss, where the law is concerned. It can be the thing that hangs you.

[cerberusalert]

As RLP are acting as agents of TK Maxx then ultimately they are responsible for everything they do.

[Crazy Diamond]

Yep, agree, the "I didn't know" excuse hold little water, TK Maxx contracted RLP, they can't just wash their hands off it, it's not like they haven't been made aware of RLP's dubious behaviours before. If they want to dissociate themselves from them, let them terminate the contract.

[renegadeimp]

I know its no excuse but we've had plenty of reports of RLP doing things that are considered illegal/unlawful. The retailer wouldnt know anything about that, because if they did, they would drop RLP pretty damn fast.

[Crazy Diamond]

But would they? Surely before signing on the dotted line, their lawyers looked over the contracts and RLP's modus operandi before deciding to go with them? If simple people like us can tell that their methods are unlawful, can the retailer really plead innocence about this? Or did they just choose to close their eyes, or worse thought "what the hell, the end justifies the means"? I don't know, doubt anyone will ever find out, but I am deeply suspicious of the Nuremberg defence.

[renegadeimp]

Have a read of what RLP's business practices are like. It's pretty much guaranteed that the retailer is left in the dark about a lot of things. I'm just surprised that RLP still exist after the oxford case. They must have told one hell of a whopper to their "clients".

[Crazy Diamond]

I have. I also know that people repeatedly tried to tell retailers about RLP practices and they were thoroughly ignored. That doesn't put them on the side of the angels from my point of view. Like I said, I doubt we'll ever know for sure.

[ScarletPimpernel]

Retailers make money through RLP, and that is what allows them to overlook or not care about RLP's methods. Besides, they may have fallen for RLP's bullsh1t about crime deterrence...

[Crazy Diamond]

Indeed.

[davewright13]

write a nice letter to the court to tell them about the new fine and ask for their advice? They'll tell you 100% what to do.

[ims21]

write a nice letter to the court to tell them about the new fine and ask for their advice? They'll tell you 100% what to do.

 

What new fine would this be then?