Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Where do I find MOT LAW please?


Darfyddi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4143 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I have been quoted loads of interpretations of the MOT laws for the UK but I need to read the actually law.

 

I had a car fail an MOT at a garage and they told me that due to the new omputer MOT (instead of just paper) that I could no longer take my car back home as it had no mot and implied I would not be insured if I did.

 

Some people say that the car CAN be taken straight home, some say NOT.

 

I need to know as this cost me an extra £335 of which almost £250 was labour that I could have done myself.

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here we go https://www.gov.uk/getting-an-mot/after-the-test

 

It says

If your vehicle fails the test

 

If your vehicle fails the test you’ll get a ‘notification of failure’ from the test centre. The failure will be recorded in the secure central MOT database.

Until it passes a retest, you can only drive your vehicle:

  • to a pre-arranged appointment at a garage to have the repairs done
  • to a pre-arranged MOT test appointment

Your vehicle should be retested at the same test centre which did the original test.

 

You may want to check this out too https://www.gov.uk/getting-an-mot/retests

 

And here is an article on main changes to MOT law in 2012

 

http://cars.aol.co.uk/2012/01/04/changes-to-mot-rules-in-2012-are-you-ready/

 

Sounds to me like garage possibly extended the truth slightly to make you have the repairs done by them where you stand on that someone else will have to help you

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is the shortened version but basically yi is illegal to drive a non-exempt vehicle that requires a test on public roads without a current MOT,[except when driving to or from (subject to insurance terms and conditions) a booked MOT Test. So you could have driven it home, made the necessary repairs then taken it back to be tested but not driven it around to pick up parts. You may find more help here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOT_test I can't scroll through it properly now. Or try contacting VOSA direct for help, they'll know for certain! http://www.dft.gov.uk/vosa/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course, if it failed and you have been advised that it is dangerous to drive away, then you would need to consider your own safety and that of other road users.

 

From memory (though this is in the days when there was some common sense on vehicle testing, and there was a mechanic in every person owning a car/motorcycle) if the MOT could not be completed, the vehicle was classed as NOT having undergone a test and therefore driving it away from a test station did not form part of the exemptions (currently VT30 ?) .

Link to post
Share on other sites

my understanding is you can drive it TO or FROM an MOT test centre. I do not believe it needs to pass the test first time and you can drive it home having failed the test, (otherwise there would be no need to include the "and from" bit in the exemption would there!). I think the garage have pulled a fast one on you to get the work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my understanding is you can drive it TO or FROM an MOT test centre. I do not believe it needs to pass the test first time and you can drive it home having failed the test, (otherwise there would be no need to include the "and from" bit in the exemption would there!). I think the garage have pulled a fast one on you to get the work.

 

The 'from' part used to have restrictions on it, a vehicle that is classed as 'dangerous condition' would not be given the right to travel on the road if the MOT station identified such a fault. Whether this is still the case I am not sure.

 

Knowing what the vehicle failed on would help

Link to post
Share on other sites

my understanding is you can drive it TO or FROM an MOT test centre. I do not believe it needs to pass the test first time and you can drive it home having failed the test, (otherwise there would be no need to include the "and from" bit in the exemption would there!). I think the garage have pulled a fast one on you to get the work.

 

Also some people book an MOT before the previous one has expired, what would they do then? prevent you from taking your car home,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also some people book an MOT before the previous one has expired, what would they do then? prevent you from taking your car home,

 

Why should they when the car has a valid MOT.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I generally do mine a week or 2 early as well so you have the peace of mind that it is never going to be off the road waiting for repair. You don't "lose" any of your MOT year either as within a month of the test due date the garage can predate it to it's "official" MOT due date so you still have the full year (plus the extra week or 2) before your next MOT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If my mot runs out in march and i take it to be mot'd in feb and it fails is my mot until march still valid or does the mot failure cancel it? Am i mot'd or not?

 

Its still valid but if you are advised that the car is considered dangerous to drive you could still be prosecuted for knowingly driving an unroadworthy vehicle.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its still valid but if you are advised that the car is considered dangerous to drive you could still be prosecuted for knowingly driving an unroadworthy vehicle.

 

I don't think it is TBQH... even if you have a current MOT the fact that it fails a new test means the MOT is out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it is TBQH... even if you have a current MOT the fact that it fails a new test means the MOT is out.

 

MOT is a Certificate of roadworthyness at the time of testing. A car does not fail, it just is not given a certifictae of roadworthyness.

 

You cannot be done for no MOT when you have a valid cartificate but that does not remove your responsibility to drive a roadworthy vehicle.

 

A failure is actually a refusal to issue a certificate.

 

http://www.dft.gov.uk/vosa/repository/Plain%20Paper%20Refusal%20of%20an%20MOT%20Test%20Certificate%20-%20Issued%20in%20Conjunction%20with%20VT30W%20(for%20completion%20by%20hand).pdf

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I still think you're wrong.

 

What you are saynig was the case previuosly but now that MOTs are held electronically if your car fails then the old MOT is invalid.

 

I will stand to be corrected but remember this precise conversation when I took my Merc for an MOT in error 4 mnoths early (using the MOT station I had used for years when I sold cars)

 

I asked what would happen if it failed and he said it would invalidate the old MOT.

 

In which case IF it failed he would put it down as 'MOT test not completed / abandoned' which would mean it hadn't actually failed and the current MOT would still be valid until expiry.

 

I'll confirm that next time I speak to him, but am pretty sure that's the case.

 

As always I may be wrong...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I still think you're wrong.

 

What you are saynig was the case previuosly but now that MOTs are held electronically if your car fails then the old MOT is invalid.

 

I will stand to be corrected but remember this precise conversation when I took my Merc for an MOT in error 4 mnoths early (using the MOT station I had used for years when I sold cars)

 

I asked what would happen if it failed and he said it would invalidate the old MOT.

 

In which case IF it failed he would put it down as 'MOT test not completed / abandoned' which would mean it hadn't actually failed and the current MOT would still be valid until expiry.

 

I'll confirm that next time I speak to him, but am pretty sure that's the case.

 

As always I may be wrong...

 

I mentioned as such in post 7 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?380617-Where-do-I-find-MOT-LAW-please&p=4124406&viewfull=1#post4124406

 

With the hand written MOT's any checking up of a driver using the earlier - and still operational - one would require looking back through paperwork at the garage in question, and would be almost impossible to confirm if the vehicle had failed at another garage second time round. These days with centralised records it's a couple of prods on the keyboard at 'information retrieval'.

 

Besides there really would't be any point. If the car is stopped for whatever reason, the MOT has absolutely no use in confirming the roadworthiness at the time of stopping (with maybe the exception of leveing the garage immediately after the test). Plod/VOSA will be looking at the real time status, and how the car ties in witht he rest of the documentation, in particular the insurance aspect of the nut behind the wheel as that is where the ability to collect the maximum amount of funds lies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that only the Police or VOSA can prohibit a vehicle from going on the road, a MOT testing station certainly can't. We had a car fail the other day and the customer drove it away against our recommendation. That had split a metal brake pipe on the test and lost alot of fluid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I spoke to vosa who directed me to trading standards which I believe is done through Citizens Advice (consumer service formerly Consumer Direct or something similar) and I would just like someone who advises on letters to look at this one for me please and advise me on how I should close it out and if I should make any changes...

 

 

To : effing ford garage

 

Ref: MOT #############

 

Dear Sirs,

 

I recently attended your garage on Someday the XXth of January 2013 for a pre-booked MOT on my car (AB12 CDE) – after waiting a couple of hours one of your staff told me that the car failed on 2 points – split CV boot and worn track rod end.

 

When I exclaimed "oh" and informed your staff that I would go home and get the work done then re-book he informed me that we were not allowed on the road without an MOT, I told him that I had over a week on my MOT but he then told me that I would not be insured if I took my car home for repairs and this was because the old paper system gave some discrepancy in timings but the new computer system meant that everything was instant and my current MOT became void because of it and we were not insured to drive home to arrange repairs at a suitable time.

 

Having since spoken to VOSA and Citizens Advice who are reporting this matter to Trading Standards on my behalf and I am now seeking to reclaim the monies you have defrauded me of.

 

1.) I believe that those items did need replacing however I do reserve some doubt as most garages will leave the car in the air if the customers are on the premises in order to show said customer the faulty parts – your staff told me that I could not be shown these parts as the car was already taken out the MOT workshop.

 

2.) Prior to this work being undertaken, I told your staff that I could and would do this work easily myself; for this reason I am pursuing a refund for the total costs of labour that you dishonestly charged me for.

 

The total cost of labour for this was £19#.## including VAT.

 

Yours,

 

################.

 

Many thanks in advance for serious advice - I am looking at getting this in the post as soon as possible.

Cheers,

Darf.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...