Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Apply for an HM Armed Forces Veteran Card   An HM Armed Forces Veteran Card is a way to prove that you served in the UK armed forces. The card can make it quicker and easier to apply for support as a veteran. It’s free to apply. You can currently only apply for a Veteran Card if you have a UK address. Veterans who do not have a UK address will be able to apply later this year. READ MORE HERE: Apply for an HM Armed Forces Veteran Card - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Apply for an armed forces veteran card to prove that you served in the UK armed forces.
    • The Private Parking Code of Parking has been postponed as the poor dears are frightened that thew will all go out of business once it becomes Law. We all wish but nothing could be further from the truth so doubtless most of them will have to change their ways if they don't want to be removed as approved parking companies. Thank you for still retaining and producing the original PCN which, no surprise, fails to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. [It even states the vehicle "breeched" the terms  when it was the driver that allegedly breached the terms}. It fails to specify the Parking Period and whilst it does show the arrival and departure ANPR times on the photographs [that I cannot read] they do not include how long you actually parked nor was it specified on the Notice  [photos don't count]. So that means that you spent even less time parked though it would help had you not blocked out the dates and times, so good if you could please include them on your next  post. Pofa  asks the driver to pay the charge S( [2][b] which your PCN doesn't though they do ask the keeper to pay.and they have missed out theses words in parentheses S9[2][f] ii)  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; All of those errors mean that the cannot transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now responsible . What a rubbish Claim Form -doesn't even give the date of the event which it should.  
    • it doesn't matter what you are being charged or if you missed the discount period. you ain't paying anyway..... if this ever gets before a judge. then the ins and out of POFA2012 or any IPC/BPA guidelines might come into play. until then i go get on with your life. you are spending far too much time on a speculative invoice scan scheme  its almost as if you believe these are fines and enforceable in a criminal court and you could have bailiffs at your door any minute.    
    • Debt Respite Scheme (Breathing Space) guidance - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) but dont get scammed into a DMP. simply tell whomever you call to simply apply for the BS for you.  
    • totally immaterial. time to now start reading up. Programmable Search Engine (google.com) Clickme^^^ do not miss your defence filing date no matter what dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

barclaycard debt sold to Lowell - chasing BC debt


Hacked_Off
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3632 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 367
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Oh and I've not heard back from the cra yet. Ill email the ico now.

 

Keep us posted please.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do, Thankyou for the help!!

 

On another note I have just secured a refund from yes loans after them paying silly beggars all day.

 

Well Done!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What should I say to the ico? Not sure how to word it

 

Just the basic facts of what has happened is all that's needed.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just had this back from barclaysharks:

 

in response to your complaint with Barclaycard.

 

However, we have having difficulty contacting you, and I am unable to communicate in full by email, as it is unsecure.

 

Please confirm you current address and a valid telephone contact number.

 

Alternatively, you are more than welcome to contact us on 01452 823557. We’re here until 6pm this evening and again from 8am tomorrow morning.

 

Kind regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they now saying they are unsure as to who they are dealing with?? Sharklaycard digging themselves a very nice hole it would seem!

 

I would just inform them that due to the 'insecurity' of the internet at their end, you don't wish to divulge your current address, and certainly not your private telephone number, however, your address should be on their files, and any thought of contacting you via an insecure communications network, ie. telephone, will result in you hanging up as you do not discuss financial matters via the phone.

 

They are encouraged to use the completely secure postal system, whereby no letters ever go missing or posted to incorrect recipients.

 

They really are muppets, no wonder the financial industry is in such a mess if they employ chimps.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes I completely agree with you on that front, have you entered Sharklays complaints procedure?

 

You'd have thought that the banking industry would have brushed up on their public image and would by now bend over backwards in an attempt at winning back customers, seems not?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sincerely sorry. I have referred matters to both parties to ensure responses are expedited.

 

Please do not hesitate to let me know, should you encounter further delays.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Piers

 

 

Piers Norman | Executive Support | Barclays Specialist Complaints - Head Office

Link to post
Share on other sites

As confirmed, I am unable to fully correspond with you by email, as it is unsecure. I appreciate that Barclays Bank PLC have sent you a response by email, although we are the same company, we currently have a different system.

 

I have responded to your complaint in writing to the address you have shared with us. You should receive this by the end of the week.

 

 

 

Mrs J Gaythorpe | Senior Customer Relationship Manager

Executive Office – Barclaycard

 

There you have it folks they admit IN WRITING barclays and barclaycard are one and the same!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Always has been ''Barclays Bank Plc trading as Barclaycard'' from day 1 I think.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i know but my ongoing complaint with Barclays were they sent the letter to the wrong address and I then pointed out to Barclays I had been corresponding with barclaycard at my correct address another is no reason for them to post to the wrong address I was specifically told "we are not the same company"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter from lowlife:

 

Following on from our previous letter in acknowledgment of your complaint, we are writing again to advise we are still investigating the details of your concerns.

 

Unfortunately, we har not bet completed the investigation that will allow us to respond fully.

 

Please accept our apologie for the delay an Thankyou for your patience(ha). Be assured that we will write to you again as soon as possible but no late than 8wrrks from the date we recieved your complaint.

 

In the meantime, I you ner to make contact with us, please telephone a member of my team on the number below

 

Yours sincerely

Some idiot

Complaints manager

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter from lowlife:

 

Following on from our previous letter in acknowledgment of your complaint, we are writing again to advise we are still investigating the details of your concerns.

 

Unfortunately, we har not bet completed the investigation that will allow us to respond fully.

 

Please accept our apologie for the delay an Thankyou for your patience(ha). Be assured that we will write to you again as soon as possible but no late than 8wrrks from the date we recieved your complaint.

 

In the meantime, I you ner to make contact with us, please telephone a member of my team on the number below

 

Yours sincerely

Some idiot

Complaints manager

 

Or in English

 

Damn, it would seem that you have us by the short and curlys and we are desperately trying to find a way around this.

 

Be assured that we will write to you again as soon as one of the staff come up with a clever, not thought of before, way

around it and we can continue our attempts to fleece you.

We do need the money as I would like a chocolate wabbit for easter.

 

signed

Link to post
Share on other sites

As confirmed, although we are the same company, we (Barclaycard) currently have a different email system, and therefore to I am unable to fully correspond with you by email.

 

Therefore, I have responded to your complaint in writing to the address you have shared with us.

 

You should receive our final response by the end of the week. We have nothing further to add.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reply from Barclay sharks:

 

I emailed you recently about your complaint, promising to investigate and be in touch again by 4 feb. I am sorry with the responses you have received to your subject access request.

 

I would like to clarify that your debt is no longer owned by Barclaycard. The debt was sold to lowells in June 2011.

 

Lowells have confirmed that they have responded to your subject acces request in may 2012, and sent you copies of statements and a copy of your agreement. A further copy of the agreement was sent to you in December 2012

 

I understand from them, that you have also raised your complaint with them, and raised a concern regarding statute barred. They are currently reviewing these for you. I have forwarded a copy of your email to lowells. They will be in touch shortly to resolve your complaint with you.

 

Yada yada

 

So barclays think they don't have to comply with a sar because they no longer own the debt? What a load of tosh. If that's the case when why was the original reason"unable to locate an account". Also they say the debt was sold to Lowell June 2011, they why have lowells marked a default on my credit file in 2010? Lowell also did NOT send statements or an agreement in may 2012, they sent me a letter telling me to get onto barclaycard for those.

 

****ed off ain't the word

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...