Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks all. Think I have come to a plan dx please correct me if I am getting you wrong but I am going to go down the route you suggest. simply stop payments for now until I receive a DN and it gets marked on my file. Then contact each lender and start making token payments to each one. i then assume most like they will then at some point sell to DCA. Once they are sold I’ll be coming back to see how best I deal with it.  Let me know if I am making some error in judgment or missing anything with my plan 
    • while politicians trough at subsidised bars and canteens, claim thousaands in expenses while letting out their properties and tories vote to leave UK children hungry That ALL needs to stop
    • J&P Credit Solutions are specialists on debt recovery. Either way they seem to be swapping between the JandP and IDR whatever their exact definitions are.
    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice with help from CRS ltd


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4192 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

About a month ago I started getting odd texts from a company called CRS, the text had a ref. number and a message saying please contact us.

 

These texts carried on over the next few weeks but started to become more threatening, i.e. court action.

 

I googled the telephone number and it brought up CRS ltd a DCA.

 

As I had no idea what the debit was referring to I ignored the texts thinking it was some type of [problem].

 

Two weeks ago I received a letter from CRS ltd asking them to contact them regarding a debit of £136 with regards the ref number at the top of the letter.

 

As the letter didn't state who the debit was owed to or for what

 

I sent them a letter on the 13/11/12 based on the template from another website to tell them I had no knowledge of the debit

and to not contact me any more unless they could provide evidence for the debit in question.

 

I sent this by recorded delivery ( just checked the track and trace on the Royal Mail website and it says come back later).

 

This morning I received a text from CRS saying they are passing my account on to HL LEGAL and to stop this call Sarah at CRS.

 

If I do owe somebody money then I will sort it out, but I refuse to pay somebody I don't know for a debit I'm not aware of.

 

And can't believe that they don't state on the letter where the debit has come from.

 

I hope somebody on here can advise me, did I do the right thing with the letter I sent to them?

 

Can they start legal proceedings against me? And do I have the right to know what the debit is for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd check your cra file

see below

 

that might throw some light

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Started using one of these so called 'Free' credit check sites and after you've entered your details, including debit card details, it then tells you to phone a 5p a minutes line to finish registration. What a rip off, its not free at all. Whats worse to cancel you also have to phone the same number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

try noddle

 

or anf of the others listed below

 

as long as you phone and cancel within 30days

they are free

 

noddle is free from the off

but sometimes is lacking.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never use those site they garner 2nd hand data and are not uptodate anyway, Equifax & Experian have 30 day free trials just cancel when you have the data you need.

As DX says Noddle is free but not always uptodate.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

who is doing this charge?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had another text from CRS telling me this is the last day our client can offer a discount. So in a period of just 3 days its gone from 'its being passed onto HL legal' to ' last chance for discount'. What are they playing at.

 

By the way thanks to everyone who has replied to my posts, its good to know that their is somebody out their ready to listen and help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically what they are attempting to do is con you out of money you don't owe.

 

As they have offered a discount, ignore them completely, you clearly owe nothing to no-one, if they offer discounts on legit debts then there is seriously something wrong with it and will never face any form of legal action.

 

Check your credit file on Noddle, forget ringing the other number to cancel, just leave it.

 

Please do make a formal complaint to the OFT&TS, also Ofcom, then ignore them.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, just checked my credit rating with Noodle and its 1.

 

Have searched through the different areas and can't find anything saying I owe anybody any money.

 

Just to clarify if I do owe somebody money where does it appear in the Noodle report and what would it look like?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

As this is CRS you havent by any chance stayed at any Travelodges as they use CRS services?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi All,

 

It looks like CRS have totally ignored my prove it letter (its still not showing as delivered on the royal mail website)

as I've just received a letter stating that as I had failed to respond to their previous communications they intend to instruct one of their representatives

to make attendance at my address in the next 7 days.

 

It the has the usual rubbish of please contact us to avoid this course of action blah blah blah.

 

There is still no indication who this debt is for just the same meaningless ref number.

 

What should my course of action be and also is this anything to worry about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to lodge formal complaints with the OFT&TS as these clowns haven't grasped the concept of following guidelines or best practice.

 

Quite how anybody is expected to know what they are being chased for if the chaser can't have the common sense to divulge the info is beyond me, or it could just be that they have absolutely no idea who it is they are trying to con? I would go with the latter, they have no idea if they have hit their target so instead in order to confirm this, using their state of the art tracing procedure, they will threaten and intimidate everyone with the same name in the hope that one of them will ring them up and do their dirty work for them.

 

Ignore them, and if some fool does turn up on your private property, you know what to do! Use whatever colourful language you see fit, but if they fail to remove themselves call the police and have them remove them.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Cur or Madman,

 

As you have failed to respond to my letter date xx xx xxxx with any satisfactory answers I now consider the matter closed.!!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

2nd class get proof of posting free from PO desk

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...