Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
    • Frankly I think you should go to a hearing unless you feel especially nervous . If you have any worries then you should follow our link to find out about a county court familiarisation visit     You shouldn't forget that county Court judgements are very helpful but they are not binding. They are only persuasive.  It is difficult to see you losing but it might be better to be there in order to counter any arguments from the other side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lloyds & Reconstituted copy of OH's Credit Card CCA


roaringgirl
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3793 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have had a response from Lloyds - they have sent me a reconstituded copy of the CCA.

 

It does not contain a signature, although I believe it doesn't have to contain a signature in order for it to be enforceable.

 

It's for credit card and it has my husband's name and address on it but nothing else. No credit limit on it.

 

That was document 1.

 

Document 2 was entitled

'Your Lloyds TSB Credit Card terms and conditions.

Applicable from 26th November 2011'

The account was defaulted on in 2004.

 

They have given a statement of the account in another, separate letter stating the balance,

credit limit,current monthly interest rates, arrears and further payments to be made.

 

They state they have sent us a copy of the Signed document - but it is not signed.

 

My husband owes them £896 - we have previously offered £330 as a F&F settlement which they have refused.

 

I'm not sure if we can do much more - they insist that this is a legally enforceable debt.

 

What next?

 

Any help would be appreciated.

 

Roar.

Edited by roaringgirl
additional information
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi,have payments been made at any time since the default date?

The recon is not compliant unless it includes T&Cs from the inception of the account and at the time of closure.

Check your credit rerference files to see if the debt shows.

What was the purpose of the CCA request?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,have payments been made at any time since the default date?

The recon is not compliant unless it includes T&Cs from the inception of the account and at the time of closure.

Check your credit rerference files to see if the debt shows.

What was the purpose of the CCA request?

 

 

We have been paying through Payplan since 2004.

The purpose of the cca was to see if it was enforceable.

 

 

The recon has no date on it and no signature just his name and address . They have refused all offers for a f&f

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CCA recon does not have to have a signature, but it must have the original anf final Ts & Cs.

As this is a pre April 2007 agreement they would need the original to enforcein court.

I would contest the validity of the recon, a complaint to the Data Controller is needed.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CCA recon does not have to have a signature, but it must have the original anf final Ts & Cs.

As this is a pre April 2007 agreement they would need the original to enforcein court.

I would contest the validity of the recon, a complaint to the Data Controller is needed.

Thank you Brigadier - is there a template of a letter of complaint I could use?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No not really, but I can draft a letter for you tomorrow for you to suit the situation.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

:-) Thank you

 

Just had a response from Arden by the way

- they had sent me a recon too but as it had no name, no T's & C's in fact nothing I challenged it.

 

They have just sent me a letter saying they are looking into my complaint and will get back to me within 14 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

LLOYDS CARD

 

1) Lloyds card - Payplan say my husband owes them £794.97 but they say we owe them £896.25

2) We offered a payment for f&F but it was rejected

3) CCa'd them and was given a recon with only my husband's name and address - no other details.

Also given a variation of terms dated Nov 2011.

The debt was defaulted at the end of 2004.

 

Where next? I'm not sure this will stand up

- should I SAR them?

 

omplain?

 

What?

 

How do I go about challenging them about the recon?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Brigadier,

 

I am referring to your earlier comment

 

"As this is a pre April 2007 agreement they would need the original to enforcein court."

 

Are you sure? Having read lots of threads on thisit appears this is rather a grey area?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Were the Banks name and address on the documents provided?

Was stement of the account provided.

The recon should have Debtors name and address as at the inception of the account.

The creditors name and address as at inception.

The Original terms and conditions, any varaitions and the terms and conditions as at the closure of the account or current if the account is''live''.

A statement of the current state of the account.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Were the Banks name and address on the documents provided?

Was stement of the account provided. Yes - an overview but not all the payments which have been made

The recon should have Debtors name and address as at the inception of the account. Yes

The creditors name and address as at inception. Yes

The Original terms and conditions, any varaitions and the terms and conditions as at the closure of the account or current if the account is''live''. Yes - but only general ones - no sign of the credit limt at all

A statement of the current state of the account. No! Only what I have stated above

 

See above!!! And apologgies for posting again about this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As it stands yes

 

they would need a copy of the original signed and executed agreement BUT English Civil Law ''grows'' the judgements made in higher courts, ''case''

 

such case law has allowed the production of ''reconstituted'' agreements in certain circumstances,

 

the recon has to comply with said case law a judge has to decide if the recon perhaps with the production of statements for example showing useage of the credit facility

and payments being made are enough to believe that an account exists/exsisted and that an obligation still subsists.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok the credit limit is advised after the agreement has been executed, normally either with the card or shortly before the card is issued.I would not expect it to be on the agreement.

The statement is only for the current status of the account,if you requier any other data you must make a SAR.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be impossible to judge otherwise, I cannot see any merit in denying that an account exists and is/has been used.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No that only happens automatically with a CCA request, the best you can try is to tell them you have made a SAR and the account is in dispute until you receive the data, they may or may not accept.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes a full and final settlement may lead to CRA entries being marked partially satisfied or satisfied if the creditor will not agree to total removal

 

The settlement Must be entirely on your terms as follows.

 

The offer is made on the strict understanding that:

 

1. Any remaining balance is not sold or assigned to any third party.

2. You agree to remove all adverse data from ALL credit reference agency files.

3. This offer is open for 7 working days only.

 

OK the negotiations:

 

1. Make a low offer of no more than 7.5 - 10% of the full balance.

2 Keep all negitiations in writting.

3. DO NOT make any payment without the creditors explicit written agreement, if you do they will treat it as a ''gift'' and just credit it to the account and pursue you for the balance.

(3) Is the most IMPORANT to remember.

 

4. If the first offer is not acceptable raise no more than 2.5%, this hopefully will elicit an amount that the WILL accept then you negotiate downwards.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter to challenge recon if you wish to do so?

 

You are not intending to point out to them What is missing just that you believe that the recon does not meet sect 77/78 CCA 1974.

 

Address to the Compliance Manager

 

Ref: as on their reply to the CCA request.

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

I refer to your letter dated xx xx xxxx in regard to my request for documents under section 77/78 of the CCA 1974, I have now reviewed the the documents supplied and have concluded that they DO NOT comply with my lawful request under the Act as the reconstituted agreement is incomplete.

 

Therefore the account therefore remains formally in dispute.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok - despite having been in a DMP since October 2004

- this account has not been defaulted.

 

After much rummaging I found the original letter with the original amout outstanding.

 

The amount was £3552.05.

 

We have paid them £2848.20 which leaves an oustanding balance of £703.82

and NOT £896 as stated by them.

 

Time to dispute again I think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Odd that Lloyds have not defaulted a debt that size, is this info from your credit files?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...