Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3850 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What they are obliged to send your in response to a CCA request isnt the same thing as what would be required in court to be enforceable.

 

I know all this sounds stupid but the CCA is a very complicated ACT, and not a lot of people understand it fully, not least DCAs!!!

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 421
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

To be Honest i dont either :D( And im a brunnette)..i have read so much on here about CCas and still cant get my head around it ..letter will be in post tomorra ...i didnt even have a letter of haliprats to say IQOR were collectin on their behalf ..IQOR told me they were collecting ...Thanks again u are a Diamond!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

aww fanx CCM ...another tick is comming ure way :)..are u saying that the agreement they have sent is unenforcable tho at the mo ( bet the original wudnt have copyin and pasteing on the back )?? becoz others are saying it its not .Not on mine but on the same DOCs that another CAG member has( i will try and find the link then send u ..its in the halifax forum) ....Thanks i wudnt of said it was unreadable ..but so small i need a magnify to save my eye site ;)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/124924-halifax-credit-card-cca.html

 

This is the thread you were looking for ;)

Regards Shirei

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi babydoll

 

looks like we took out a Halifax card, months within each other - I have exactly the same layout as you

 

kennyruss/HALIFAX - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

 

will keep an eye on this thread and post anything interesting I find to;)

 

kenny

Edited by kennyruss
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi yours if different from mine slightly!! i never got the 3rd scan with mine ,,i also never got balance on accountthe credit limit!!! and the intrest rates are different and the amount payable to them i never got ..i only got ure 1st scan and your 2nd ...what is halifax playing at ??..pls keep me informed with ures ill be watching with intrest :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kenny..nice to meet you ...are you gonna send the letter CCM has put on for me ..has CCm said CCAs are very complicated things i still cant get me head around it can you ??

 

nice to meet u to babydoll

 

still trying to decide whether it is an application form or agreement.. but will need to send something in the next few days.... will do some more digging on the forums... a lot of people with this type of "form" - search HALIFAX CCA

 

kenny

Link to post
Share on other sites

nice to meet u to babydoll

 

still trying to decide whether it is an application form or agreement.. but will need to send something in the next few days.... will do some more digging on the forums... a lot of people with this type of "form" - search HALIFAX CCA

 

kenny

 

Alot of ppl have the fronts that we have ..and they have a strip down the side saying application form( i think they are an application form) ..they seem not to have it on ours ..i wonder why LOL...could be that ppl are cottonin on

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alot of ppl have the fronts that we have ..and they have a strip down the side saying application form( i think they are an application form) ..they seem not to have it on ours ..i wonder why LOL...could be that ppl are cottonin on

 

ok I going to gather 7 or 8 of these fronts and post em here... will dump them in a photbucket album

 

back soon

 

kenny

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

UPDATE ..well this is the letter i received to day of IQOR..they also sent me the same CCa they sent me B4 but this time the Conditions of use is on a seprate sheet of paper..and not on the reverse as the first one was ..Anyone know what my nxt move will be ..Cheers Guys :)

 

http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s168/lisa5_01/P1010062.jpg

Edited by babydoll0141917
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi folks, just been reading this thread, and it seems to me that you have an application form, i do remember peterbard getting a letter about it and it took me a little time to find it but here it is, in a sense an application form is Not regarded as a credit agreement and therefore not worth the paper the bank has written it on. I will look into this more, but my understanding is if it's not a legal agreement then they have no rights to process your information as it's an improperly executed agreement and unenforceable under section 127 (iii)

 

dti

 

21 December 2006

 

Re consumer credit act 1974

 

Thank you for your letter of the 7th of December on behalf of your constituent Mr Peter Bardsley of******************* about a possible irregularity in the Consumer Credit act 1974.

 

The Consumer Credit (Prescribed Periods for Giving Information) Regulations apply to all the situations that ate listed in the Schedule to the Regulations and this include Sections 77 and 78 of the Act, which are about copies of the executed agreement and not pre contractual information

 

The Cancellation Notices and copies of Documents Regulations are made under Section 180 of the Act ) power to prescribe the form etc of documents) and Section 180 enables Regulations to be made to provide for including/excluding certain information from copies sent out under the Act. The Regulations apply to all copies sent our under the Act unless specifically excluded in the Regulations themselves.

 

Mr Bardsley describes a situation in which he was sent a copy of a company’s standard Terms and Conditions when requesting a copy of a signed agreement form. Just sending the Terms and Conditions is a breach of the Act and Regulations as, apart from the information that the Regulations provide that you may exclude, the copy must be a “true copy” of the agreement**

 

If Mr Bardsley feels that the rules are being flouted he should report the companies concerned to Trading standards and the Office of Fair Trading. It is also a breach of the Act and the Regulations to send the application form rather that a “true copy” of the Agreement.

On the point that Mr Bardsley makes about unscrupulous companies adjusting agreements, If there were a dispute about an agreement, the lender would need to prove to a court that there was an agreement and, it is highly likely that the lender would have to produce the original signed document to prove they had and agreement with the consumer to start with,

The lender should need to prove to a court that there was and agreement **and, it is highly likely that the lender would have to produce the original signed document to prove they had an agreement with the consumer to start with. If the lender can’t prove the existence of the agreement, winning any court case would prove difficult.

 

 

Approved By the Minister and signed in His presence

 

Pp Ian Mc Cartney

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the main issue here is for them to enforce it they would have to come up with a properly executed agreement that contains all the prescribed terms in it, also the terms and conditions can not be on a separate document, that is also a breach of the consumer credit act 1974. Challenge them on this and continue to ask for a properly executed agreement that you asked for under section 78 of the act and until they comply with it then no enforcement activity can continue. Also ask for the Notice of assignment which they should provide you with, if they don't have one, challenge them on what document will they be relying in court for the processing of your personal information as the app form does not say IQOR, just halifax.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Iqor were only collectin on halifaxs behalf it wasnt sold to them..shud halifax still of informed me that they were gonna ask iqor to collect on their behalf..even tho it wasnt sold ??....do you know of a letter i could put together adarling.? do i just send all letters to halifax now and not to iqor??.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what i sent them, you will have to change the dates etc. if you decide to use it,

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY OR ANY COMPANY YOU CLAIM TO REPRESENT

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

Dear Sir or Madam,

Your Reference: xxxxxxxxxx

 

I refer to your letter of 06/11/08, I must admit that I am rather bemused as to why this account has been passed to yourselves, as it is in dispute with the Bank of Scotland and has been since 9th February 2008.

Not only is this a breach of OFT collection guidelines, but also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Data Protection Act 1998.

My letter to Bank of Scotland dated 26/03/08 outlined the fact that the documents they had sent to me do not conform to the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and to date I have received nothing further to remedy this.

As Bank of Scotland are now in default of my Consumer Credit Act request, and OFT Collection Guidelines, I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default enforcement action is NOT permitted, under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law.

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to the Bank of Scotland for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as Iqor cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

If Iqor chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action.

After taking advice, I am of the opinion that any continued pursuit is in violation of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40 as well as breaching a number of the OFT Collection Guidelines

I hope that this will not be necessary and an acceptable solution can be accomplished.

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

I look forward to hearing from you in writing, as this is the only method by which I am prepared to respond.

Yours faithfully

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your a diamond CCM i will use your letter and add a few more bits, IQOR did say in the last letter that if i still werent happy to contact halifax direct ..do you think i shud write to halifax too or just send Iqor the letter and let them pass it back to Haliprats..then wait for haliprats to contact me ??

..your letter is actually very simular to the one i sent blair orrible and stupid in sept after i got a couple of threat agramms of them

Edited by babydoll0141917
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well unless you have already done so, i would write to halifax to say the docs they supplied are not acceptable etc., and you regard the matter as being in dispute until they have fully complied.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...