Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • follow it thru, plenty of time to poss arrange a tomlin or consent later on. ............   pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466952-lowelloverdales-claimform-old-cap1-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5260464 .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] .............. dx
    • so you've never been issued a default notice ever and all these accounts still show on your credit file?  
    • No i decided I would try and keep paying this down as best I possibly could and have paid over 35k off of the total amount. It’s been hard as hell tbh but just seems too much to do with the prospect of job disruption looking. the issue I have with pro rats is the credit file is trashed anyhow like you are defaulted anyhow is it not? I am willing to trash it for 6 years if needs must but having it trashed for over a decade seems crazy. This is the dilemma I am in
    • come on .😉..you'd read our threads.. you already knew these things. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I am getting letters from Lowell to my parents house re very old catalogue debt.


dosb123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4270 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Im new to this but I would like some advice.

 

I received about 6 letters today from a company called Lowell for a debt that is apparently from 'shop direct'.

 

The problem is Lowell sent these letters to my parents house.

 

I have not lived there for over 12 years.

 

The letters were also in my maiden name which I changed when I married nearly 9 years ago.

 

I long time ago I did get into debt with a few companies but as far as I am honestly aware, I cleared all of my debt. I have never heard of shop direct or Lowell.

 

My problem is my mum is understandably quite upset about this and has concerns about debt being registered at her house.

Im not sure how to handle it.

 

If I call or write to Lowell they are then going to assume that they can keep contacting me there and I dont want to upset my mother further.

 

If I try and get a credit report for my name at my parents house will this be any kind of fraud because I dont live there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome,

 

Debts are not registered against a house but the person. This debt will be a long time Statute Barred, your parents address is the last address Lowell have for you.

Why can't you get a Credit Report from your present address ?

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be for a very old catalogue debt.

Shop Direct took over a number of catalogue companies.

But their accounts are rubbish.

They will have sent over a new batch of historic debts to Lowells,

who have just sent a letter to the only address they have found for you.

 

The debt will be statute barred and therefore not enforceable.

 

If you send them this letter ( link below) from your current address,

they should then leave you alone and also stop writing to your parents address.

 

Per OFT rules, if a debt company is advised a debt is statute barred and the debtor does not want to pay it, then they have to leave them alone.

Do not phone them, as it will be a waste of time, as they will just want payment on moral grounds.

 

You owe Lowell nothing. They would have bought the debt for about 2% of its value.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?408-Letter-sent-when-debt-is-statute-barred

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your advice.

 

I got a credit report (at my address) about six months ago and there was no mention of Lowell or Shop Direct.

 

I was worried that if I acknowledge that they have written to my parents house they might keep doing it until I pay them because they will know that they are upsetting me by doing so.

 

My mum is worried that debt collectors may call at her house. She is not at all like me and has always kept her finances in order. The thought of this has stressed her a lot.

 

I will send them the letter that you have suggested. Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I was worried that if I acknowledge that they have written to my parents house they might keep doing it

 

You've hit the nail on the head, I'd stick any letters they send back in a post box unopened with 'return to sender, this person does not live at this address'.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

and just tell her any doorstepper has no legal powers anyhow.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Im new to this but I would like some advice.

 

I received about 6 letters today from a company called Lowell for a debt that is apparently from 'shop direct'.

 

The problem is Lowell sent these letters to my parents house.

 

I have not lived there for over 12 years.

 

The letters were also in my maiden name which I changed when I married nearly 9 years ago.

 

I long time ago I did get into debt with a few companies but as far as I am honestly aware, I cleared all of my debt. I have never heard of shop direct or Lowell.

 

My problem is my mum is understandably quite upset about this and has concerns about debt being registered at her house.

Im not sure how to handle it.

 

If I call or write to Lowell they are then going to assume that they can keep contacting me there and I dont want to upset my mother further.

 

If I try and get a credit report for my name at my parents house will this be any kind of fraud because I dont live there?

 

12 years removed from address 9 years since named changed Lowell have dug up another tranch of statute barred rubbish.

 

I doubt there will be anthing showing on the reports for debt this old.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...