Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Labour Party has increased its poll lead over Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's Conservatives to stand 30 points ahead, according to a YouGov poll for the Times newspaper. A previous YouGov/Times poll, published on May 2, gave Labour a 26 point lead.   reuters.com WWW.REUTERS.COM  
    • rather than reducing the levels of c02 and nox in the atmosphere A VERY large increase   Record-breaking increase in CO2 levels in world’s atmosphere | Greenhouse gas emissions | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Experts issue warning after finding global average concentration in March was 4.7ppm higher than same period last year Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases GML.NOAA.GOV The Global Monitoring Laboratory conducts research on greenhouse gas and carbon cycle feedbacks, changes in clouds, aerosols, and...   Global Monitoring Laboratory - Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases GML.NOAA.GOV The Global Monitoring Laboratory conducts research on greenhouse gas and carbon cycle feedbacks, changes in clouds, aerosols, and...    
    • This is the info that I have. Name of seller... Thomas Stone. Reg LG51UOV Driven 109,000 2001 ford escort van 55 Price paid £500. (I know that that's stupidly cheap for a van, but my son wanted to take it apart, and put it to gether again) His address st margarates drive gillingham kent. We live swindon, so over 2 hours away. My oldest sons machanic inspected it . Sorry I don't know if I'm reading this right, but NSR wheel cylinder leaking NSR Shock mounting corroded  Rear cross member corroded  Rear number plate light missing Brake compressor valve seized Hand break cables insecure O/S Seal to floor repairs are very badly done Dash lights are painted out Bonnet ( This is all he wrote here.) Brake pipes are covered in black doodoo ( This is what the machanic wrote). My son asked Thomas Stone if it would need lots of work, for it to pass its next mot,  Thomas Stone said , " I can't see it needing mega amounts of work, for it to pass, it isn't rotten and it starts and drives ok, and the brakes work well".             
    • Alan Bates is in the Guardian today. Our Post Office victory is being twisted by those who don’t want to see its like again | Alan Bates | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Litigation funders didn’t ‘exploit’ subpostmasters, they helped us. Those who attack them have corporate interests at heart, says former subpostmaster...  
    • Discover 8 skills you develop when you explore different points of view that are essential for life and work.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

highlandertom vs. Barclaycard-Cabot


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4222 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, not sure if this is posted in the right place?

 

I have two cc acounts in arrears, Cabot bought them both from Barclaycard, but did this whilst a payment arrangement was in place, for £5 per month with no interest , Cabot simply continued this arrangement.

I sent Cabot separate cca's with £1 postal orders, for each account, then after no response, 'account in dispute' letters , they have failed to respond or even acknowlege any of these letters? All letters sent 'signed for' and all received. Could someone help me?

Was it 'legal' for barclaycard to sell these accounts to Cabot in the first place? there had been an unbroken payment record to Barclaycard once the arrangement was put in place.

Both accounts go back to 2000/2003 ish, so unlikely that they can supply docs. so what will happen next? I will complain to Trading Standards once a month has passed, anything else I can/should do?

 

many thanks, Tom

Edited by highlandertom
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, does the SAR relate to me the person, rather than a specific account? I will have no ppi to claim, being self employed I had allways refused it, but will have fees and charges. I will send off the SAR tomorrow to barclaycard, and list all three account details.

many thanks, Tom

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one SAR will suffice for both... Or all three if you want. You may find some handy charges or ppi to reclaim!

 

Fine BUT you must ensure you state ALL accounts and list them.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Erm...heard of Google? :lol:

 

 

Barclaycard is a trading name of Barclays Bank PLC, registered office 1 Churchill Place, London E14 5HP

 

Halifax Credit Cards are issued by Bank of Scotland plc, Registered in Scotland No.SC327000. Registered Office: The Mound, Edinburgh EH1 1YZ.

  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:oops:Thanks ims21, did look at the ICO's site, but it seemed to point to clydesdale for barclaycard?

 

I'll get those off now.

 

Any chance you could take a look at my thread, and pdf attachements,

highlandertom vs. Haliax CC

 

I do not really understand what they have given me. Firstly, the application form is illegible, so will write and ask for a clear copy, but as to the reconstituted stuff?I have no idea if it complys with the act, and now it has been sold on to crabit, pardon spelling, need to work out what is what. One good thing is that they will have no right of offset now.

 

 

many thanks, Tom

Link to post
Share on other sites

had the same with crapit, two Barclaycard accounts purchased, one they admit there is no CCA, the other just a reconstructed, as both are way pre 2007 told em wanted the original and they would need the original for court action.... They admit they can't under English Law enforce but you had the money hippy now pay..

More chance of me beating the bolt at the 100metres than them getting a penny. Then comes the 50% discount letter,, keep going boys, down to 2% and you might tweek the Hippies interest.. !!!!!!!!!!!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Happyhippy1959

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...