Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Had medical but now been sent a IBM270(more info)letter????


Riggsby
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4221 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had the atos medical around a mth ago,not heard nowt,then i received a letter(IBM270 More information) from dwp saying that they have looked at all the info given to them.... there was a tick by the medical questionaire,a tick by the medical assessment but no tick by the doctor's certificate??

It goes onto say that based on this info u may not be entitled?..then...

Before we decide if u are entitled or not,let us know if theres anything else about your illness/condition that u want to tell us about!

For e+ample,tell us..

if u think we have not taken into account something that you have told us about your illness,or

anything about your illness that you have not told us about already.

If you do not have anything more to tell us

Please let us know straight away lol

If u have something to tell us

Write to us

 

At the bottom it says...

We must get the information within 17days of the letter?

It dont make much sense to me as they had loads of info in the esa50 and were told same in medical!

Why dont they get all the info themselves as the history notes would spell it out clearly instead of relying on 3rd party info?...im baffled,what are they hanging the decision on?..your help would be great as 17days is now 15 days lol ty riggs.

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had the atos medical around a mth ago,not heard nowt,then i received a letter(IBM270 More information) from dwp saying that they have looked at all the info given to them.... there was a tick by the medical questionaire,a tick by the medical assessment but no tick by the doctor's certificate??

It goes onto say that based on this info u may not be entitled?..then...

Before we decide if u are entitled or not,let us know if theres anything else about your illness/condition that u want to tell us about!

For e+ample,tell us..

if u think we have not taken into account something that you have told us about your illness,or

anything about your illness that you have not told us about already.

If you do not have anything more to tell us

Please let us know straight away lol

If u have something to tell us

Write to us

 

At the bottom it says...

We must get the information within 17days of the letter?

It dont make much sense to me as they had loads of info in the esa50 and were told same in medical!

Why dont they get all the info themselves as the history notes would spell it out clearly instead of relying on 3rd party info?...im baffled,what are they hanging the decision on?..your help would be great as 17days is now 15 days lol ty riggs.

.

 

 

What on earth is that letter on about.

 

"if u think we have not taken into account something that you have told us about your illness"

 

How would you know? If they say that they have used all of the information that you have sent them then they must have used it???

 

Maybe they forgot to use some of what you have already told them but are expecting you to be a clairvoyant and know which bits that they had forgotten to use.

 

It just couldn't be made up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At a guess you are probably short of entitlement by a point or two and you have an opportunity to review. Ask them for a copy and check the report against the pertinent benefit. Make google your friend.

 

But how are you to know what points you were given and for which descriptor. It's like trying to do it blindfolded.

 

There is no point in asking for the ESA85 as that takes weeks to come through if ever!

 

The letter is on par with some of the worst that I have ever seen. It tells you absolutely nothing so there is no way you can rectify anything.

 

And all of that is based on the assumption that you have a copy of the ESA50 that you submitted. Like many others, I don't keep such copies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if there's no tick for GP (un)fit note then that's a good place to start. Review all the info you sent and think what could be added. More supporting letters? How about your GP or any other medical professional you may have involved with your care? Look on the bright side, you've been given the opportunity to expand on your need for ESA ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive not had to hand in any unfit notes for past 5years!..It says on the letter they havnt looked at the infomation on my doctors certificate as its unchecked??...why is that?..They must of contacted my dr surely as thats common sense??..Would CAB or any of u folks know the meaning of it?..i cant be the 1st person to get this after a medical ty all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, my apologies Riggsby. I thought this was to do with ESA, you need to send in (un)fit notes to qualify for the ESA assessment rate as you won't receive any money without doing so. If you're moving from IB to ESA maybe this is why they sent you the letter, as a gentle reminder? ...

 

EDIT: er, no. The good folk processing ESA rarely if ever contact the GP. The whole point of the system is to try and sideline GP's from the loop. Common sense? You've not come across ESA before have you? ... :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

My ex-husband received one of these letters, so he re-sent all the letters that he originally provided at the "medical" and he passed. So I suggest you do exactly the same - anything you've already suppplied, re-send a copy to them. If you haven't already supplied any supporting evidence, this is your chance to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive not had to hand in any unfit notes for past 5years!..It says on the letter they havnt looked at the infomation on my doctors certificate as its unchecked??...why is that?..They must of contacted my dr surely as thats common sense??..Would CAB or any of u folks know the meaning of it?..i cant be the 1st person to get this after a medical ty all.

 

No that is your job! If you want a benefit it is up to you to get the evidence to prove that you are entitled to the money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No that is your job! If you want a benefit it is up to you to get the evidence to prove that you are entitled to the money.

 

This is true, but I'd ask you to consider your phrasing more carefully, in the interests of maintaining civil discussion here. Yes, it is not the responsibility of the the DWP to chase up medical reports, and indeed, most doctors wouldn't talk to them even if they did make the attempt. Still, the OP has been receiving benefit on one set of terms for five years - it's not unnatural to be a little confused when these terms are unilaterally changed.

 

I think rainbo has it. My guess would be that the DMs are considering overriding an adverse ATOS WCA result and finding in favour of the claimant. They probably don't have, at this point, all the evidence they would need to do so, since ATOS doesn't always send much more than the ESA85 report and a covering letter. So I'd say do what rainbo suggests, and send whatever you can. If they wanted to deny your claim, they'd have done it already.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ty all for good advice i will be sending them all the letters i can,...just one thing to mention is that i had to renew my low rate DLA aswell and was awarded the same rate as b4 from the 23/08/2012 for ne+t 2 years!

 

Would atos/dwp know about this? or should i send my DLA award notice to em?...if so does it have to be the original or a photocopy?

Also does the fact that u have been awarded DLA have any bearing on the ESA outcome or not?ty riggs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could draw the ESA section's attention to your DLA award, but no need to send an award notice as they can easily check on the computer system. DLA, however, does not directly affect the ESA outcome.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree they probably looking to overide a failed ATOS assessment that did give points but not enough to pass.

 

I would at the very least send any evidence that was provided to ATOS as ATOS may not have passed that on.

 

Yes. There are cases where DMs will look to pass a person who got, say, 12 points at the medical. Their logic is simply that if it goes to appeal, the claimant is likely to win, so why bother with the hassle?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my comment was based on that DWP report posted here a few weeks back, in that report DMs said anything above 0 points was rare enough in that they considered if ATOS awarded 'any' points the condition was probably severe and so they looked into those cases more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didnt send any letters in with the esa50 or when i went the medical!

I told them who to contact in the esa50 in the "who can we contact section" and Dr address section!..which is why i thought they would get the info required or why else ask for it on the form?

The only person who knows my condition has left there job a few years back when the building closed and i havnt seen anyone else since that!..my doc just knows whats written in the history notes and as i avoid telling people that a suffer with pathological an+iety etc ,most dont know whats what!

When i was awarded DLA 5 years back it went to tribunal and they sent an atos dr to my house,and my occupational therapist was there to.

He concluded in his report that from his observations.. that i have a markedly pathological an+iety disorder which is made worse by stress!(significant disability likely)in bold letters.

Not long after i was awarded the OP left and i moved house!

4years went by and i havnt seen anyone else since because i shut myself away and dont bother telling people whats happening!

Not sure whats the best thing do if they want recent diagnosis?

Its rather pathetic that we have to do all the contacting and finding out! even tho its a simple phone call for them to do!..I dont even answer my mail or go to appointments recently and the dwp want me to be an admin/secretary guru and have all the letters neatly in place without a hitch?

?:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

my comment was based on that DWP report posted here a few weeks back, in that report DMs said anything above 0 points was rare enough in that they considered if ATOS awarded 'any' points the condition was probably severe and so they looked into those cases more.

 

I missed that post, but this makes sense.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure whats the best thing do if they want recent diagnosis?

Its rather pathetic that we have to do all the contacting and finding out! even tho its a simple phone call for them to do!..I dont even answer my mail or go to appointments recently and the dwp want me to be an admin/secretary guru and have all the letters neatly in place without a hitch?

?:???:

 

Information you provide should relate to your condition as it was on the date of your ATOS medical.

 

Harsh as it may sound, the DWP simply does not have the resources to chase up medical information for everyone who claims. Also, it isn't really their job - if you claim benefit, the onus is on you to prove your entitlement. There may be support available from other sources, though: the CAB for one, and some local authorities provide a welfare rights service free of charge. Plus, of course, you can ask here and we'll help as best we can.

 

And, as we've said, it looks like the DWP DMs are trying to find in your favour here, and wish to look at more than simply the ATOS report. So I would gather what evidence you can and send it to them.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ty all for good advice i will be sending them all the letters i can,...just one thing to mention is that i had to renew my low rate DLA aswell and was awarded the same rate as b4 from the 23/08/2012 for ne+t 2 years!

 

Would atos/dwp know about this? or should i send my DLA award notice to em?...if so does it have to be the original or a photocopy?

Also does the fact that u have been awarded DLA have any bearing on the ESA outcome or not?ty riggs.

 

 

Just a point to mention related to ESA & DLA.

 

Well people just to verify they do use ESA for DLA see ny proof of my award......

 

img009 copy.jpg

 

 

You can see that as clear as day on my DLA form

:whoo:

My advice is based on my opinion and my experience. It is not to be taken as legal advice as I am not legally qualified

If my advice has been helpful, please take a moment to click on the scales

on the bottom left hand side of my profile :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didnt send any letters in with the esa50 or when i went the medical!

I told them who to contact in the esa50 in the "who can we contact section" and Dr address section!..which is why i thought they would get the info required or why else ask for it on the form?

The only person who knows my condition has left there job a few years back when the building closed and i havnt seen anyone else since that!..my doc just knows whats written in the history notes and as i avoid telling people that a suffer with pathological an+iety etc ,most dont know whats what!

When i was awarded DLA 5 years back it went to tribunal and they sent an atos dr to my house,and my occupational therapist was there to.

He concluded in his report that from his observations.. that i have a markedly pathological an+iety disorder which is made worse by stress!(significant disability likely)in bold letters.

Not long after i was awarded the OP left and i moved house!

4years went by and i havnt seen anyone else since because i shut myself away and dont bother telling people whats happening!

Not sure whats the best thing do if they want recent diagnosis?

Its rather pathetic that we have to do all the contacting and finding out! even tho its a simple phone call for them to do!..I dont even answer my mail or go to appointments recently and the dwp want me to be an admin/secretary guru and have all the letters neatly in place without a hitch?

?:???:

 

Unfortunately yes you are expected to maintain an up to date file of your condition, who you see, and what is reported.

 

I know many that don't bother with their GP as there is little that can be done for them and I know that the Tribunal, should there be an appeal, don't look favourably at those that say that they have problems yet don't seek help - they see it as an admission that the problems aren't as serious as they are making out.

 

Someone told me that the best way to secure any sickness or disability award is to make sure the GP is kept upto date on a regular basis on how you are coping.

 

Otherwise a GP report for the DWP will read - Care - able to self care - Mobility - can get into the surgery occasionally.

 

Those that 'play the system' know all of this and make a nuisance of themselves with the GP by having regular meetings. They are even known to keep on asking for drugs on repeat but never taking them.

 

They build up a picture in the head of the GP as well as for the DWP. They probably will get an award over the poster because they know how to play it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a point to mention related to ESA & DLA.

 

Well people just to verify they do use ESA for DLA see ny proof of my award......

 

img009 copy.jpg

 

 

You can see that as clear as day on my DLA form

:whoo:

 

I'm so glad you mentioned that. Yes they will use any other evidence for a different benefit.

 

It is not unknown for the DWP to question a DLA award and eventually take it away from someone on the strength of a failed ESA assessment, even if the claimant manages to get it overturned at appeal.

 

My 3 year Support Group review will be coming up anythime now. I also get HRM & MRC. I am seriously considering giving up my ESA claim for that very reason. I don't want a DLA review.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...