Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
    • So you think not pay until DN then pay something to the oc to delay selling to dcas?    then go from there? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyd's OD debt - lots of charges - wescot - now Robbersway.


Venga78
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2885 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

my hubby recently checked his credit file and has found he has a default put on by Lloyds.

 

We want to apply for a mortgage around Oct/Nov next year 2013

and we really want this debt paid so it can show as settled.

 

hubby phoned Lloyds and they said the debt has been transferred to Westcott.

he phoned Westcott and they couldnt find any info for him

and said they would write to him

- that was 2 weeks ago and times ticking away

...what should he do? :!:

 

Any advice is appreciated.

Edited by Venga78
Link to post
Share on other sites

when was the default applied? if it is a valid default it will remain on your CRA file for 6 years regardless of whether you pay the debt or not, also did lloyds send you a notice of assignment regarding passing this debt to westcrap

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there thanks for the reply.

 

Not received a notice of assignment from Lloyds,

however I think they may have the old address on their database.

 

My hubby did send them a letter asking them to give him a breakdown on the debt

as they had applied a lot of charges when he had gone into his overdraft

when he was on JSA

 

, this was awhile back but he did send them the new address

but they wanted him to pop down to a branch with proof.

 

I understand the default will remain 6 years after the registered default

(which was in 2009),

but the mortgage advisor has told me it will look favourable

if the debt shows as settled for a year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When did he default and when did they put on the default to the credit file ?

Did Lloyds send him a default notice ?

 

Have Lloyds actually sold the debt to Westcott or have they just sold the rights

(assigned) to collect on the debt ?

 

If Lloyds have not actually sold the debt ( he needs to ask Lloyds whether just assigned),

then if he can afford to settle the debt,

there is no reason why he cannot just send Lloyds a cheque,

with a letter asking them to confirm credit file noted as satisfied.

 

If the debt default is the only one on the credit file and it is satisfied,

then it might not affect any mortgage application

 

. But is depends on which mortgage is applied for.

Suggest working with an independent mortgage broker and not going direct.

If you go to bank directly and get turned down

, it will show on credit records, making further applications more difficult.

 

A mortgage broker should be aware which companies are ok with one satisfied default and help with the application.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply...

I will ask him to phone Lloyds today when he comes in from work

and ask them if they have sold it on or not.

 

He defaulted in 2009..

.I'm not sure when the default was put on

, I will ask him but I know it was in 2009/2010.

 

He has not received a default notice yet,

but they have his old address registered on the closed account.

He moved in 2010 and did register on the electrol register once he moved.

 

I did contact an independant mortgage broker,

and he told me the debt needs to be satisfied for a year before he even looks at lenders.

 

We have not had any credit searches done regarding mortgages

as it'll be a waste of time and as you said will show on credit records..

.we are trying to be very careful. :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Apologies for the delay,

my husband finally got through to someone who was able to give him a bit of info,

he's been told his debt has been reassigned,

he has no idea what this means.

 

..he was told they could not accept a payment because it's in the process of being assigned & that they'll send a letter to him in 7 working days....

 

If Lloyds still has the debt is there any chance they could take the default off for the full payment?

 

I'm not sure how these things work as my payments have always been on time for anything I've committed to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he pay the debt in full,

they will simply note it as satisfied on his credit file

and they won't delete it.

 

Lloyds have obviously packaged the debt with others

and have gained agreement for a debt collector to chase.

So it may be too late for Lloyds to accept payment,

but they might not be able to do much,

if he goes into a Lloyds branch and puts a credit through to the account, getting a receipt.

 

He should then send the Lloyds dept. dealing with the debt, a copy of the payment receipt and ask them to note the debt as fully satisfied on his credit file.

 

Once a default is noted on a credit file, they are never removed,

unless they had been added by mistake.

 

So pretty pointless asking for this, unless you can find a error.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply,

 

my husband received a letter from Lloyds stating that the debt had been passed on to Moorcroft Group Plc,

 

he phoned them up and spoke to quite a nice lady who he explained to that he couldnt afford to settle all the balance but could settle half of it on the condition they mark it down as fully settled.

 

She noted down his financial expenditure and said she would send a letter to Lloyds and see what they could do....??

He also said he hadnt received a default notice,

(Lloyds said they had sent one to his now prev address),

 

he also told her that most of the debt was in fact made up of charges Lloyds had put on whilst he was on benefit and that he had tried so hard to seek help from them but had been passed on from pillar to post.

 

All to half of the actual debt amount owed were charges Lloyds had put on whilst he was on benefit which is quite sad really, as soon as his benefit was put in to his bank account, it would be eaten up by Lloyds

 

...he was on benefit with JSA because unfortunately he had lost his job

and instead of being understanding and helpful,

 

Lloyds did not care one bit and continued to take out his benefit payments,

which were his only means of living and supporting himself.

 

He said he had phoned them on quite a few occasions to tell them his situation

& he went to the citizens advice bureau who phoned up Lloyds

and told them to please stop with the charges on his overdraft...but they never did.

 

Please can someone tell us what to do next

...my husband did send a SARS request last year

but they said he would have to go to his local branch with ID of his address for them to act upon it - they returned the cheque.

 

I know this is a bit complicated and a lot of info

but any help would be appreciated...ty.

Edited by Venga78
adding "Group plc" deleting the but about name as it was not necessary info.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I would certainly suggest a written complaint to Lloyds head office about the way he was treated and about the charges. Sounds like there is a possibility of getting a significant amount of those charges back. That would probably be easier than messing around with an SAR. Let Lloyds look into this, as part of a complaint.

 

Send a copy of the complaint to Wescot. They will no doubt pass the debt back to Lloyds.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

And stop phoning. Everything in writing. Just because they sound pleasant on the phone doesn't mean they will help you. All these cretins are interested in is getting money off you, as much of it as they can in as short a period as possible. What Lloyds did in piling charges shows they don't care quite clearly. And remember you don't have to disclose details of income and expenditure to anyone unless ordered to do so by a judge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot for the replies, is there a template or anything that would be the best for this particular situation? Also what is the best address to send a letter of complaint to please? Is this one ok:

25 Gresham Street

London

EC2V 7HN

 

I really do feel LLoyds has acted very irresponsibly - charging someone who had best intentions to pay but couldn't afford to due to unfortunate circumstances thus forcing him to leave home and stay with his mom because he did not have sufficient means to live or support himself with as lloyds was taking all his benefit payments. I will defo send a letter of complaint....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes stay OFF the phone, unless you are recording it, there will be no evidence of your conversation with them.

 

Keep everything in writing.

 

Ignore Moorcr@p they have no legal powers to do anything, certainly never ever ring these clowns again.

 

Get onto Llyods complaints procedure and exhaust it, all of the charges and the interest they charged on the account needs to be refunded,

and as for taking his benefits that is a definite no no, a very strongly worded complaint about their sleazy actions needs to be made.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok we shall stay off the phone, we'll write a letter of complaint and see how that goes although when I called the financial ombudsman they said they couldn't do much about it although we were welcome to make an official complaint! They said that because of some court ruling complaints for unfair charges didn't mean much anymore.

But we'll write a complaints letter and see where that takes us...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your complaint isn't about the refundable charges, it's about them taking benefits as payment, that goes against everything that the OFT/TS and even the government says.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok i'm a bit confused, should we make an official complaint or send a SAR to check all the charges incurred and then send a request for refund based on hardship grounds? Which route is the best way to go?

 

Complaint letter to Lloyds Head office, about they way you were treated, which caused hardship. Don't bother with SAR, as it is up to Lloyds to investigate your complaint. In the letter tell Lloyds that you believe you were treated unfairly and will involve the FOS if you have to.

 

Once your complaint is registered with Lloyds they have 8 weeks to resolve or to issue a final response earlier. If your complaint is not resolved to your satisfaction, then you can go to the FOS.

 

The FOS are correct in that some charges may be viewed acceptable. But it is each case on its own merits and hardship is a specific issue banks have to take into account.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok sure i'll get this done right away, thanks!

Will report back with any updates.

 

(Heres one I made earlier)

Here is a copy of the letter I will be sending ....

 

Lloyds TSB

25 GRESHAM STREET

LONDON

EC2V 7HN

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Account number:

 

This is an official complaint against Lloyds sent via recorded delivery regarding charges put on my account for when I was suffering from considerate financial hardship and in receipt of Job Seekers Allowance.

These charges have lead to a default being put on my account whereas I feel the default sum on the account is composed mainly of charges and interest put on by Lloyds.

 

I am writing to request that you repay all the charges in relation to direct debits, unauthorised overdrafts and standing orders that have been applied to my account in the past six years.

 

I believe the fact that I have been incurring bank charges goes contrary to the aims of the Lending Code (Section 9) and Banking Conduct of Business Sourcebook (section 5.1.4 ‘in particular, a firm should deal fairly with a banking customer whom it has reason to believe is in financial difficulty’). My personal situation has been affected by the charges leaving me in financial hardship and I am writing to request that you take the following grounds into consideration:

 

 

Unfortunately my job loss in ????? and relationship break down ultimately lead me being overdrawn and incurring multiple charges. These charges were high and because I was in a vulnerable situation receiving JSA I had little chance of escaping from the cycle of debt that ensued. I got stuck in a cycle as the combination of these high charges, the inability for Lloyds to help me, and low income made further charges unavoidable. Most of my Jobseekers allowance was being eaten up by the interest and charges incurred.

 

Upon losing my job and having a relationship break down I was forced to live with my mother, she worked part time, had 2 kids to look after and she was a single mom. I could not afford to pay her much rent or help with day to day expenses.

- I was struggling to meet basic necessities, rent and basic expenses i.e. food.

- My income was eaten by charges and interest

- I had suffered a relationship break down and had a significant loss in income upon losing my job.

- I was living in my overdraft.

- The charges contributed to make my financial hardship situation materially worse.

- I was stuck in a cycle of snowballing charges. I had charges on charges, and thus I was stuck in a trap of not being able to clear charges before new daily or monthly fees were added on top.

 

This had a huge affect on my relationship with my mother who had her own financial woes and to this day it has never been the same.

 

I genuinely felt I had no where to turn, Lloyds did not appear willing to help although I phoned various times and even went to the CAB, who also tried to get the charges stopped, and for some arrangement to be made but to no avail. Nobody in Lloyds helped, they sent me from one department to another, Lloyds did not treat me fairly and was not considerate to my financial hardship situation although they knew I was in financial difficulty as I was having my benefit paid into the same account.

 

I look forward to a full response to this letter within 14 days and if I do not receive a satisfactory response I intend to pursue my complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service or small claims court at the earliest opportunity.

 

Yours faithfully,

Edited by Venga78
Link to post
Share on other sites

Great now we've just received a letter from bleedin Moorcroft telling us to settle the payment in 7 working days!!!

 

 

I'm sending this letter to them:

 

MOORCROFT DEBT RECOVERY LTD

P.O. BOX NO.17,

2 SPRING GRDENS,

STOCKPORT

SK1 4AJ

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Attached is a formal complaint letter/dispute sent via recorded delivery to Lloyds TSB regarding the above account.

Please pass the debt back to Lloyds as the account is now in dispute.

 

Yours Faithfully

Edited by Venga78
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore moorcroft. They have no legal rights. Its pretty much just a fishing letter designed so they can get a cut of the debt. Theres no need to send them any copies of any complaints letter.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hi there, I know this is an old dispute

but after I sent the letters - not much happened!

 

The debt just got passed around and

now we've received a Pre-legal Assessment from Robinson Way

saying they might possibly transfer debt to Howard Cohen & Co solicitors in 10 days

who will possibly ask the court for an order

 

...this was before they said they could give a hefty discount.

 

I don't think anyone can prove the debt.

We will be sending the original complaint to LLoyds again

and a letter saying account is in dispute to Robsinson Way with a copy of the complaint..

.or should we do something else?

 

Im scared they will bang a ccj on as the default will come off this year! HELP!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore it. You'll be marked as gullible otherwise and they'll keep harassing

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply...Really? But what if they put a CCJ on? I'm so confused, we were thinking of sending a letter saying I don't acknowledge the debt and for them to send us proof...

Link to post
Share on other sites

They won't. There's a procedure they have to follow. they can't just put one on. Plus you can defend it if they try and stop them in their tracks.

 

It's exactly the kind of lack of knowledge and you being scared they hope for so they can lie and pressure you into paying what you don't owe.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...