Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dear all, I am hoping for some advice/guidance on this matter. I received a LoC dated 12/04/24 and replied to this on the 2/05/24 disputing claim with the following reasons: 1: [Inadequate Affordability Assessment]: I contend that your institution failed to conduct a thorough assessment of my financial circumstances prior to approving the loan. As a result, the loan amount and repayment terms were not suitable for my income and financial situation. 2: [Unsustainable Repayments]: The repayment schedule imposed by the loan agreement placed an undue burden on my finances, making it impossible for me to meet my other financial obligations without experiencing significant hardship. 3: [Lack of Transparency]: Your institution did not adequately disclose the risks associated with the loan, including any potential increases in interest rates or fees over the loan term. I also added the following: Under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regulations, lenders have a legal obligation to conduct thorough affordability assessments and ensure that loan agreements are suitable for borrowers' circumstances. I hereby request that your institution: 1: Conduct a full investigation into my claim of irresponsible lending. 2: Provide me with copies of all documentation related to the loan application and approval process, including affordability assessments, credit checks, and correspondence. 3: Cease all collection activities related to the loan until this matter is resolved. Yesterday i received the attached reply via email and it included: 1: The Original Loan agreement 2: An account statement 3: A copy of a default notice letter. The email included a link for a direct debit set up page where you enter their reference and your bank account details (looks like a standard D/D set up page) but there is nothing to indicate the amount of the D/D that I might be agreeing to. I also think two days response time is not long enough to appropriately reply. Any thoughts appreciated   Email-compressed.pdf
    • Easy to set one up on Gov.uk , search on Google.
    • Hi London  he doesn’t have government gateway. Should we do it via post?
    • If you are helping a family member you are going to need their Government Gateway details in order to Log in to MCOL .
    • read upload use the stated online websites dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest loan - claiming charges & PPI when on DMP


Big Shoooz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4244 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I took out a personal loan with Natwest in 2005.

 

Although I had previously had loans with Natwest going back to pre 1999,

and this 2005 loan was just a re-finance of the previous loans so that I could boorow more money on top of what I had already borrowed and was paying back.

 

Payments were always made on time each month until 2006 when I got into financial difficuly and I put the debt into a DMP where it still stands today.

 

I have checked my credit report and at no time has the account defaulted.

 

As I have had this account in various forms for an awful lot of years,

I am thinking there MUST be PPI and lots of charges on it which I could claim to reduce the debt down (It started at £31k in 2005 and is now £23k).

 

Can you please advise the following:-

 

1. Can I claim PPI and charges at the same time and whilst in a DMP?

2. How far back can I claim the charges from, just from 2005 when I refinanced the loan or from the earlier years when I first took out a loan in the nineties?

3. Which charges can I claim? Interest? Late payment? Anything else?

 

I have been a slave to Natwest for long enough and now I think it's time I fought back for some of what is lawfully mine!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I took out a personal loan with Natwest in 2005.

 

Although I had previously had loans with Natwest going back to pre 1999,

and this 2005 loan was just a re-finance of the previous loans so that I could boorow more money on top of what I had already borrowed and was paying back.

 

Payments were always made on time each month until 2006 when I got into financial difficuly and I put the debt into a DMP where it still stands today.

 

I have checked my credit report and at no time has the account defaulted.

 

As I have had this account in various forms for an awful lot of years,

I am thinking there MUST be PPI and lots of charges on it which I could claim to reduce the debt down (It started at £31k in 2005 and is now £23k).

 

Can you please advise the following:-

 

1. Can I claim PPI and charges at the same time and whilst in a DMP? - yes but sep claims

2. How far back can I claim the charges from, just from 2005 when I refinanced the loan or from the earlier years when I first took out a loan in the nineties? - 6yrs from today without court

3. Which charges can I claim? Interest? Late payment? Anything else? - PENALTY charges - [late/over/dd reject/letter/ec]

 

I have been a slave to Natwest for long enough and now I think it's time I fought back for some of what is lawfully mine!

there is no time limit on PPI at all

 

and you refinanced so the ppi rolled over

even more money

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX, you have answered some questions and it seems I am in with a chance of reducing my debt but I still have more questions:-

 

1. So I could claim back as far as year dot (over 6 years ago) but if I did I would have to go to court?

2. Do I need to stop paying Natwest through the DMP whilst I am claiming?

3. Can interest charges NOT be claimed?

4. I possibly don't have all my statements so do I need to SAR Natwest first?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

My OH has several credit card and overdraft debts for which he has not made a payment for about one year.

 

Initially,

he informed the OC's of his financial difficulties and offered token payments but none have accepted.

 

Since then,

various DCA's have come and gone and to begin with my OH was also corresponding with them and offering the same token payments.

 

Again, none have accepted.

 

Now that the merry-go-round has begun and each debt is passed from one DCA to another,

my OH has just started to ignore the letters.

 

He's at the point where he's too confused to know which DCA actually owns the debt!!

TBH he's quite happy for one or all of them to say they will make him bankrupt because he cannot afford to do that

and he has no assets and we do not own our home so there would really be nothing to lose

and the debts would be gone so there would be no more freaking out every time the post arrived.

 

I guess there are now different actions that my OH can take and I was hoping you good people on here would have some sound advice on the best option to take:-

 

1. Avoid all contact with DCAs and eventually the debts may become Statute Barred

(I know, this probably won't happen as further action will probably occur within the next 6 years,

although I have heard of some cases on here where the DCA's have gone away for years).

 

2. Set about claiming all PPI's and unlawful charges over the years to reduce the debts down,

THEN ignore every threat-o-gram thereafter in the hope that either

(A). the debts will become SB or

(B). Someone will proceed with bankruptcy.

 

BTW, my OH wouldn't mind making token payments but this would take years to pay off the debts in full.

 

Please help!! Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX, you have answered some questions and it seems I am in with a chance of reducing my debt but I still have more questions:-

 

1. So I could claim back as far as year dot (over 6 years ago) but if I did I would have to go to court?- for charges possibly yes - ppi no

2. Do I need to stop paying Natwest through the DMP whilst I am claiming? - no but if you see the reclaims would kill the bal, drop them t £1PCM

3. Can interest charges NOT be claimed? - no only on what has been levied on the ppi & penalty chrges [ the spreadshet will do that for you] on

4. I possibly don't have all my statements so do I need to SAR Natwest first? - yes

Thanks

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good plan

 

his cra file will tell you who owns a debt now

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

option 2 lets see what happens then

then p'haps off F&F?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX,

 

Thanks for your help.

So just so that I'm sure on a couple of things:-

 

 

1. So I could claim back as far as year dot (over 6 years ago) but if I did I would have to go to court?- for charges possibly yes - ppi no

So as I will be making a separate claim for each, I can claim back PPI further back than the last 6 years without going to court but for charges I should only claim back the last 6 years to avoid going to court?

3. Can interest charges NOT be claimed? - no only on what has been levied on the ppi & penalty chrges [ the spreadshet will do that for you] on

Can you please send me a link to or direct me to the spreadsheet you mention thanks?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 correct, you could try charges outside 6yrs though see what they o

 

2.http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good plan

 

his cra file will tell you who owns a debt now

 

dx

 

Sorry DX, me again!...

Just had an afterthought, whilst the accounts will be in the PPI & charges claiming process, will they be classed as "accounts in dispute" and therefore cannot be chased by DCAs or OCs??

Should all correspondence to the DCAs and OCs also state at the top that "I do not acknowledge this debt"?

Finally, my OH's Credit report shows one of the debts which is being chased by Westcot and which we understood to now have been sold to Westcot is actually showing as belonging to the OC. Why would this be? The report was updated on 2nd August.

Link to post
Share on other sites

reclaims do not put accounts into dispute.

 

wescot are obv trying to spoof you

 

ignore them.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh Dear!!! Natwest must be pshycic!!

Today I have received a letter from CapQuest ststing that Natwest has instructed them to consider litigation if I don't respond.

Natwest have been quite happy for this loan to be repaid through a DMP for years and my credit report shows the account is "up to date" (although it was only last updated in July).

Why would I now be receiving this letter from CapQuest and can further action be taken whilst I'm on a DMP?

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan up that crapest letter pleaae...i hve a plan........

 

 

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

or

convert existing PC files to PDF [office has an installable print to PDF option]

.

'

BUT......

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc barcodes etc using paint program

but leave all figures and dates.

.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

.

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx, thanks for coming back to me.

Damn, all gadgets are playing up at the mo so its quicker for me to type up the letter contents. The letter is dated 18th August but was received today. It reads as follows:-

 

Our Client:

RBOS (First point to note here is I don't recognise the debt as RBOS. I only know it's Natwest because of the amount owed!)

A/c No: XXXX

Balance: £23988.00

 

We have been appointed by RBOS Plc to contact you directly in relation to the above outstanding balance.

 

Our client has instructed us to consider litigation by 16 Sep 12 if no satisfactory response is received.

 

This firm, together with our solicitors, will endeavour to help and assist you in any way possible to clear your indebtedness without the need for legal action.

However this can only be achieved with your full co-operation.

 

We are presently undertaking various checks and validations to expedite legal proceedings.

These checks will be focused on property ownership, through the Land Registry Office and validation of employment details.

 

Your payment must be sent without delay to the address shown below.

How to make payment and other useful information can be found on the reverse of this letter.

 

Should you wish to discuss this matter and possible ways to resolve this issue contact us on the above telephone number.

 

If no satisfactory response is received by 03 Sep 12 your account together with all relevant details established will be forwarded to our solicitors for immediate action.

Yours sincerely

(Squiggle for signature)

Litigation Manager

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, can anyone advise on my last post here please because Capquest are only giving me a few days to reply before they proceed further? Thanks.

 

Ignore Crapest they are a DCA THEY HAVE NO LEGAL POWERS!!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

std threat-o-gram

 

doesn't say what action anyhow

 

just clever words to make you think they are goin to court

 

READ IT CAREFULLY

 

it does NOT say ANYTHING of the sort.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's just their last line says

"If no satisfactory response is received by 03 Sep 12 your account together with all relevant details established will be forwarded to our solicitors for immediate action."

That reads "WILL be forwarded to our solictors" not "MAY be forwarded to our solicitors" which is usually the case in a threat-o-gram.

Link to post
Share on other sites

YES

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's just their last line says

"If no satisfactory response is received by 03 Sep 12 your account together with all relevant details established will be forwarded to our solicitors for immediate action."

That reads "WILL be forwarded to our solictors" not "MAY be forwarded to our solicitors" which is usually the case in a threat-o-gram.

 

no read it properly, !!!!!

 

again you are falling for the implied threat.

 

it DOESN'T say WHAT immediate action

 

just immediate action...

 

that could be the guy going for a ****.

or immediately droppng the whole thing.

 

and anyway

 

its only the next bloke at the next desk in a diff skirt.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:whoo:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...