Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Salary docked without warning.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4353 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

I recently had an illness which prevented me from working for almost four weeks.

 

The start of the illness coincided with the Bank Holiday Easter Weekend. As a result of the holidays, I was unable to get a doctors certificate until the Thursday after the weekend, ten days after I first called in.

 

In the meantime I had been in regular contact with my employer, e mails, phone calls, but come pay day I was docked ten days wages without any warning. The first I knrew about it was when I logged into my bank account to pay my bills.

 

I have had a meeting with the manager who made the decision. He couldn't justify the deduction, nor the amount of time I was deducted (salary cut off date was less than the time deducted).

 

My question is, legally, should I have been told of the forthcoming deduction?

 

The meeting was very acrimonious due to the very distinct lack of apology and the threat to put an entry into my staff file, to which I would have no recourse. Future prospective managers would see the entry and make assumptions about me, ie, troublesome. (I'm not, but I do stick up for unfairness at work).

 

If I wanted to see my staff file, would it be a SAR or an FOI request?

 

Any help/suggestions would be very much appreciated :)

 

Buncrana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What does your contract say about illness and pay?

Speak to Acass, give good phone advice on employment issues, regarding pay deduction and File access.

 

Hi Raydetinu, I am entitled to sick pay, and I have to provide a self certificate after seven days, but common practise within the company is to fill it in when you return to work.

 

I had a union rep with me at the meeting, and he tore into this manager, but the rep is unsure of the legality of the deduction.

 

I haven't spoken to the rep re the SAR or FOI, as he flew out on holiday after the meeting.

 

Ps, it is a very large organisation I work for, been there more than ten years, if that helps :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Sick notes are a proof that you are ill in the opinion of your GP. was your original sick note dated from the day you went off or the day that you saw your GP?

I am not a legal professional or adviser, I am however a Law Student and very well versed areas of Employment Law. Anything I write here is purely from my own experiences! If I help, then click the star to add to my reputation :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Sick notes are a proof that you are ill in the opinion of your GP. was your original sick note dated from the day you went off or the day that you saw your GP?

 

Firms are looking at ways and have been for the last couple of years of not pay their staff. Do not give them the opportunity to do this if all at possible. It is an employers market now and they certainly know it. :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

The sicknote was backdated by the doctor from the first day of sickness.

 

The company does operate an SSP scheme. But my main questions are is it legal for him to do this without advising me first, and can I access my staff file using SAR or an FOI?

 

To be honest, my bridges are burned now because of this issue and by me sticking up for myself and confronting this manager. He is not used to anyone standing up to him and considers himself sacrosanct. Once movement starts amongst my grade, I'll be transferring out.

 

Any thoughts folks?? :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As already advised, speak to ACAS and see what they have to say. IMHO, I would have thought that you should have been advised that monies were being deducted and the reason for this.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

put in a grievance on why this deduction has occured and why you were never given advance notice of the deduction

 

allow 7 days then state you will put in a claim through the employment tribunal service under section 13 employment rights act, unlawful deduction of wagesif not resolved within a further 7 days

 

unlawful deduction of wages is exempt from the qualifying period for an ET claim

 

if the manager could not justify the deduction at the meeting then why did he not resolve the issue and repay you the back pay

Link to post
Share on other sites

But in a claim that is what my aunt is doing form very good advice she received on here, she took out a grievance and her very large employer is dragging their feet for the time limit to pass so she cannot take it to a tribunal. She wrote to them saying that if the part about salary in the grievance is resolved within a certain amount of time then she will be taking it to a tribunal. When you write to them get a receipt as they will deny getting the letters, they are so sneaky. You can always withdraw the claim if need to be but it will get them to do the correct thing in relation for the employee.

 

They will hold back information that you request under SAR if it is going to damage their company you would not believe what these people get up to, it is an eye opener. So keep receipts of postage everything to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as stated you do not need to wait for the results of a grievance or appeal against your employer before submitting an ET1 claim

 

the time limit is three months less one day from the cause of action to put in an ET1 claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry guys, I should have stated that I eventually got the money back, but it took ten days for this to happen.

 

As I said, my main concern is the legality of it happening.

 

Apparently, quite a few went off sick over Easter. This guy decided to take a blanket approach to the sickness rate. He tends to act as a law unto himself, and he does consider himself sacrosanct, not sure why yet.

 

As for going up the chain, it isn't really an option as yet, because his best pal is also the guy who would be dealing with the grievance.

 

The main reason for asking about the SAR, was to see what he had put on my file re this whole issue.

 

Regards,

 

Buncrana

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...