Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The important thing to know is that MET - although they will send you threat after threat about how they will divert a drone from Ukraine and make it fall on your home - hardly ever do court. Even in the very small number of cases where they send court papers, if the Cagger defends, they drop the matter before the hearing.  They have no real intention of putting their rubbish claim before a judge.  The aim is to find motorists who are terrified of the idea of going to court and who will give in when the court papers arrive. Thanks for doing the sticky and well done on finding F18's thread.  Do what they did.  On the first page - I think post 19 - there is the address of the CEO of BP.  Write to them, lay it on thick about being genuine customers in the various premises, mention the small kids, the very short stay time, attach any proof of purchase - and request that they get the invoice cancelled.
    • Thank you for that, I have obviously already been convicted so I think the appeal lodged is for the previous offence? Sorry if that doesn’t make sense. I suppose my only concern is that weds I go there and they don’t let a stat dec happen. If they do then as you say and solicitor says it’s highly likely I’ll be happy with the outcome. But I’m being told there’s no guarantee for the stat dec to be hard Weds as that’s not what the hearing is proposed for. Solicitor has stated that you can put a stat dec before a magistrates at any time so it shouldn’t be a problem.   
    • I re-read the extract from your  solicitor's letter this morning and think I might understand what they have in mind. I believe (and it’s only a guess) their strategy is this: 1.    You will make your SD 2.    You will enter fresh pleas to the four charges (not guilty) but will offer to plead guilty to speeding on the understanding that the FtP charges are dropped. 3.    If this is accepted they will attempt to argue that the two offences were committed “on the same occasion” 4.    You will be sentenced for those two offences (the sentence depending on whether the “same occasion” argument succeeds). They also have a plan in the event that your offer at (2) is unsuccessful and you are convicted again of the 2xFtP charges (and so face disqualification under “totting up”): 5.    They will make an “exceptional hardship” argument to avoid a ban. 6.    If that is unsuccessful they have already lodged an appeal in the Crown Court against that decision. (This is the only “appeal” I can think of). 7.    They plan to ask the court to suspend your ban pending that appeal. If I’m correct, I’m surprised the Crown Court has agreed to accept a speculative appeal (against something that hasn’t happened). The solicitor says this is to lodge it within the normal timescales. But you will have 21 days from the date of your conviction (which will be next Wednesday) to lodge an appeal with the Crown Court, so there is no need for a speculative appeal. I have to say that an application to have your ban suspended pending an appeal is unlikely to succeed. The Magistrates Court is unlikely to agree to it for one very good reason: if they make such an order (suspending your ban until your appeal is heard), all you need to do is not to pursue the appeal and the Magistrates order suspending your ban will remain in place. Hey Presto! No ban and no need for you to trouble with an appeal. Perhaps he will ask for your ban to be suspended for (say) three months or until your appeal is heard (whichever occurs first). This potentially creates a problem because if your appeal is not heard in that time either your ban will kick in or you will have o go back to court to get the suspension extended. But the solicitor obviously knows more about these things than I do. I would want to be very clear about this solicitor’s fees and what he proposes to charge you for. As I said, there is absolutely no need to lodge an appeal with the Crown Court. That can be done if and when it becomes required. But I am still firmly of the opinion that it is overwhelmingly likely that you will not need to progress beyond point 2 above. Point 3 is optional and I don’t know whether he solicitor has made It clear to you that the only thing you will avoid in the event of success is three penalty points. You will still be fined for the second offence and your driving record will still be endorsed with the details, but no penalty points will be imposed. Do let us know how it goes.  
    • I'm really trying, but worst case I can't find what are my options?
    • John Lewis' Privacy Notice states that their CCTV Systems does not use facial recognition or collect biometric data - so I assume it should be fine?    Thank you a lot for your reply. I've scheduled my first therapy session ne t week. Really the time to turn my life around..
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Caught using someone else's Freedom pass, convicted - leave to appeal granted


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4267 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I used my grans freedom pass and got caught.

 

I have phoned/emailed tirelessly to try and settle out of court but they are not backing down.

I offered to pay triple the fine but its seems they just want to prosecute me.

 

I don't care the fine

I just can handle that I will get a criminal record as this is my first ever incident with the law

and I am a student

 

When is your trial date?

 

 

have you settled out of court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 441
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I have the exact same thing as you I used my grans freedom pass and got caught.

 

I have phoned/emailed tirelessly to try and settle out of court but they are not backing down. I offered to pay triple the fine but its seems they just want to prosecute me.

 

I don't care the fine I just can handle that I will get a criminal record as this is my first ever incident with the law and I am a student doing well not some London riot chav.

 

 

These passes are issued as a benefit to people in genuine need and paid for by the public purse.

 

Your suggestion that you don't care about the fine is a good example of why the robust policy of reporting misuse does seem appropriate.

 

If you don't have a problem with paying perhaps hundreds of pounds in fine & costs, then it seems that you could have paid your fare.

 

The fact that misuse of Freedom Passes is a widespread breach of trust and can be considered in the same vein as stealing public money, is the very reason that TfL and the TOCs take a very hard line in prosecuting these matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

These passes are issued as a benefit to people in genuine need and paid for by the public purse.

 

Your suggestion that you don't care about the fine is a good example of why the robust policy of reporting misuse does seem appropriate.

 

If you don't have a problem with paying perhaps hundreds of pounds in fine & costs, then it seems that you could have paid your fare.

 

The fact that misuse of Freedom Passes is a widespread breach of trust and can be considered in the same vein as stealing public money, is the very reason that TfL and the TOCs take a very hard line in prosecuting these matters.

 

And so they should. The scheme is expensive enough without it being abused.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

I have started a new thread for you, please continue to post here.

 

You may or may not hear from the forum members you asked for updates, not everyone comes back to tell us how they get on. To me, it seems particularly prevalent for Freedom pass cases.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi everyone I really need some help,

 

I was travelling on the tube and decided to use my sister's freedom pass.

To cut a long story short I got caught and gave all my details and admitted everything.

 

I know what I have done was wrong and I am ashamed of what I have done it has been the biggest mistake of my life and has made me really unwell.

 

I then received a letter saying I might be prosecuted to which I replied with a sincere apology and a plea not to take me to court.

 

They ignored my plea and sent me a court summons.

I have tried about seven times to call/email them to allow me to settle out of court but have had no luck.

I have even offered to pay triple to fine and court costs but they just want to prosecute me.

 

I know I have to pay the fines and court costs ect and that is not a problem as that is fair.

The main problem is the fact I will get a criminal record.

 

This is my first ever offence and I am currently at university and hopefully will become a primary school teacher

and I am sure this will do fair amount of damage to my future prospects.

 

I am not a bad person I am not one of them London riot chavs I want to make something of my life.

 

I have lost a lot of weight and now need sleeping tablets as I haven't been able to sleep well since this has happened.

I am petrified that this one mistake of trying to save a bit of money will have an effect on the rest of my life.

 

Is there any help or advice you can give me as I am in court next week and I am terrified.

 

I know I should plead guilty as I was and they can definitely prove it.

When I get to the court will I get to put my points across even if I plead guilty,

like will I be able to explain how this is my first offence and that I am generally a good person.

 

Also will a few of my friends be able to watch my case while it is in progress for support,

or will they have to wait outside. Any other advice would be great.

 

Thanks guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

Plead guilty

Be completely honest

Be contrite.

Explain that you appreciate the seriousness and stupidity of what you have done.

 

Explain the effect on your job and that this is the first and last time that you will ever break the law.

 

There is nothing else you can do.

 

Read this:- https://nationalcareersservice.direct.gov.uk/advice/planning/Pages/convictions.aspx

and this - https://www.askthe.police.uk/content/Q89.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice and links. Will follow the advice. Hopefully will go okay but I doubt it very much.

 

Still wondering if my friends can come into the court room with me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, they can - but if I were you wouldn't invite them.

The magistrate might not understand why they are there and they might feel that they want to make an example to your friends.

 

Take one friend if you want the support - but leave it at that.

Dress decently - not formally but respectfully.

If you are a male - no jewelry

If you are a female - keep it toned down

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure that a suit is fine - as long as you wear it and it doesn't wear you

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've merged your two threads to keep the information together. I'm a bit confused about this.

 

I was travelling on the tube and decided to use my sister's freedom pass.

 

Previously, you said it was your Gran's?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi yeah thanks Old-CodJA's forum sticky was very helpful.

 

Just wondering will I get the chance to put my points across, like when I asked the ticket inspector if it would go any further he said that it wouldn't and it was just a warning.

 

Should I bring this up, or will I get the chance to, should I ask for the inspector that caught me to attend.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You know that some of the helicopters you hear over London are TfL? -loooking for cable thieves, you see.

 

But they haven't set up an Internet Forum Monitoring dept. yet. On a slightly more serious note... if you just fibbed about a little thing like that... :| ...no wonder you're waiting for your case to come up eh? LOL

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just didn't want them to have anything to use against me in court, it doesn't matter if it was my nan's or sisters pass it was a freedom pass and TFL go mental about that.

 

I offered them £1000 to settle out of court but they still said no.So they will waste time and money just to prosecute me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you mean? I would happily pay a grand instead of going to court and getting a criminal record.

 

They refused it and seeing as its my first ever offence I think that's a bit harsh especially as the ticket inspector misled me and said it was just a warning.

Edited by honeybee13
Removing contraversial word.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I meant, if you sent them a cheque for a grand, I bet they would've cashed it! I'm a bit of a believer in 'a bird in hand', although TfL can be contrary bastards. But if you just offered a grand it's not quite the same thing as paying it. E.g., when you hear about people settling on the steps of the Court, they literally pay up on the steps of the Court... they doon't make arrangements to ppay a little bit incrementally a month. See what i mean? Not that I'm suggesting you should pay a grand anyhow. Blimey. In fact:

 

"'Crumbs!" -Said William'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you mean? I would happily pay a grand instead of going to court and getting a criminal record.

 

They refused it and seeing as its my first ever offence I think that's a bit harsh especially as the ticket inspector lied to me and said it was just a warning.

 

Ahh well, mind you, you "lied" by using someone else's freedom pass, and got caught.

You've "lied" about whose pass it was, and been pulled up for that.

 

You've had it explained to you why Freedom pass abuse is viewed so seriously, and why TfL almost always prosecute : yet you feel you are being treated harshly?

 

If it is worth a grand to you not to be prosecuted, how much was the fare that you dodged? And why dodge it by abuse of a publically funded system intended to benefit some of the most disadvantaged?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...