Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism in these circumstances  to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know. Just a tip - if you are offered a fixed penalty be sure to submit your driving licence details as instructed. I've seen lots of instances where a driver has not done this. There will be no reminder and no second chance; your £100 will be refunded and the police will prosecute you through the courts.
    • Looks similar to you original email to their Complaints team. I dont rate copypasta for a CEO complaint. Rewrite it with emotion involved as to how badly this is affecting you and make them feel embarrassed for their actions... 
    • Well, not quite the trouncing they deserve, and Andy Street suffering - despite distancing himself from the poops and being a good mayor (and despite the rather ridiculous muslim voter labour boycott across regions - did they really want the tories to stay in power?) - But not bad at all The Reformatory goons managed two council seats didn't it - out of over 300 they tried for ..     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please help, Next are taking court action without cca agreement *** WON ***


delbuk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4276 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

IMHO you should

 

dx

 

Isn't it too late now? The hearing is set and I have sent the docs already. Would I have to start a new claim? Should I treat it as a separate case? Sorry I keep asking, I'm useless with things like this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Isn't it too late now? The hearing is set and I have sent the docs already. Would I have to start a new claim? Should I treat it as a separate case? Sorry I keep asking, I'm useless with things like this.

 

Its never to late to reclaim the charges but you may have to start a seperate claim!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a copy of their documents which they are going to present in court next month.

 

Within the documents it basically says that I received goods off them online and I still owe them the money.

 

Also they have a witness, a litigation assistant.

 

They also say that they sent an unsigned credit agreement because such requests only refer to running-credit accounts, and because mine wasn't they don't have to send it to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

" They also say that they sent an unsigned credit agreement because such requests only refer to running-credit accounts, and because mine wasn't they don't have to send it to me."

 

Running and Fixed sections 77/78/79 :loco:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

They also say that they sent an unsigned credit agreement because such requests only refer to running-credit accounts, and because mine wasn't they don't have to send it to me.

 

BS!!

 

8 Consumer credit agreements

 

(1) A personal credit agreement is an agreement between an individual (“the debtor”) and any other person (“the creditor”) by which the creditor provides the debtor with credit of any amount.

 

(2) A consumer credit agreement is a personal credit agreement by which the creditor provides the debtor with credit not exceeding £25,000.

 

(3) A consumer credit agreement is a regulated agreement within the meaning of this Act if it is not an agreement (an “exempt agreement”) specified in or under section 16.

 

61 Signing of agreement

 

(1) A regulated agreement is not properly executed unless—

 

(a) a document in the prescribed form itself containing all the prescribed terms and conforming to regulations under section 60(1) is signed in the prescribed manner both by the debtor or hirer and by or on behalf of the creditor or owner, and

 

(b) the document embodies all the terms of the agreement, other than implied terms,

 

127 Enforcement orders in cases of infringement

 

(3) The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1)(a) (signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for you replies.

 

I am quite stressed about this, I wonder whether they' ll let this actually go to court or they may give up.

 

If the judge in court asks me about me owing Next money, what do I say?

 

I haven't denied I owe them the money, but what can I say?

 

Do I just say that I am still waiting for my signed cca agreement?

 

I hope I don't have to say anything !

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you got all the statements.?

 

i'd get a charges spreadsheet done

 

how much do you owe?

 

and when did you last use [in/out] the account?

 

have you checked your CRA file too?

 

i hope this debt shows?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for you replies.

 

I am quite stressed about this, I wonder whether they' ll let this actually go to court or they may give up.

 

If the judge in court asks me about me owing Next money, what do I say?

 

I haven't denied I owe them the money, but what can I say?

 

Do I just say that I am still waiting for my signed cca agreement? Yes and also state what they said about fixed credit to the DJ

 

I hope I don't have to say anything !

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I haven't got the statements,

mainly because they didn't send me my agreement

so I thought that would be enough.

 

I have not asked for their charges because I didn't have that many.

I owe them about £700.

 

I last used the account about 2 years ago,

and had been paying ever since to clear it, but because I was late 7 days, they took it to court.

 

I have not checked my CRA account, what happens if this shows?

 

What do I do then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm really surprised they 'just' took it

to court for being 7 days late!

 

just as a side issue, i hope Next is named as the claimant

 

if its cohen, an NEXT are shown on the CRA file as the owner...

then i thought only the owner of a debt could take you to court.?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am quite sure I wasn't sent a default notice.

 

I was however on a payment arrangement scheme,

and when I contacted Next and pleaded with them to take my payment,

they said that my account had been transferred to Lewis Collection Agency,

and then I received a letter from Howard Cohen and co,

a notice of pending legal action, unless I paid them the whole amount.

 

Then I asked them for my cca and I am still waiting.

 

Next is named as the claimant

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok that expains it then

 

you were on a payment plan

so they'd not been getting the minimum for a while anyhow.

 

was this a fee paying DMP or one of your own?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry to come into this thread so late, but I think that Next (online) set up a credit account for those who ordered items from their catalogue. This is just my opinion, but it seems the mistake Next made is that people didn't sign any agreements at the time and before 2004 you needed a 'signature' on an agreement - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?152384#post1618550

 

So what I am saying is that they turned people's next accounts into credit accounts and if it was done over the internet, then they made the mistake of not getting people to sign any agreement, and as you can see from the above link - "The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Electronic Communications) Order 2004 came into force in December 2004 any online agreements entered into prior to this date still need a signed executed credit agreement.

Electronic signatures weren't considered valid until this date."

 

Bearing this in mind I think this should be one of your defending options....

 

You should also read this thread but be cautious as it is quite old - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?200505-Tactics-for-dealing-with-Next-Directory-Court-claims

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Today was the day!!!! Let me just say that I WON !!!!!!!!!!! Next's claim was struck out!!!! The words are still echoing in my ears. I had been so worried and I hadn't been able to sleep well. Today I went into court hoping things would go my way, but I thought seeing as it's me things will DEFINITELY go wrong.

 

The judge asked me why I thought asking for my CCA would help. So I said that in the unsigned one they had sent me, it said that according with the credit act of 74, I have rights. The judge then asked them, since my defence was that I hadn't received my CCA, where it was.

 

They said they don't keep them after 6 years (pathetic excuse, I know) but that I had signed one (NEVER),and they knew the date too, and although it was numbered as an exhibit as well, it was nowhere to be seen.

 

So then the judge told them that it was up to them to prove I had signed the agreement, and owe them the money. The judge then asked me whether I denied the debt. I said no, because I had been making payments every month, but when I was 7 days late, I called to make payment and they said no. The judge looked baffled that they refused a payment!

 

So I said Next escalated things to a court claim and I asked for my CCA, which I was still waiting for. I think the judge was annoyed, because they are trained solicitors, and they were trying to pull a fast one when they should know better.

 

What kind of idiots are they? They tried to intimidate me right from the start and I nearly gave up many a time!!! I want to say special thanks to everybody that answered my queries, especially andyorch, and the website for all their threads!!! Now the moral of the story is that if Next had allowed me to make that payment six months ago, they would still be getting their money today, but because they were greedy and unwilling to cooperate, they LOST it all!!!! So, again, THANK YOU, and to other co-sufferers, DON'T GIVE UP!!!!!!

 

 

All this happened while I was wearing my store bought Next top for good luck. ha ha ha

Edited by citizenB
formatted for easier reading
Link to post
Share on other sites

A great result...very well done indeed !!

 

Thank you, I still can't believe it myself. Now I'll just have to make sure they remove the debt from my credit report, unless of course they do it themselves now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done

CAG has helped me so much since I joined. Based on what I have learnt from others on here and my own experiences, I try to chip in and help others from time to time. I am not an expert and give my opinion only. Always check with the more experienced CAG members before making important decisions.

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent news.

 

Interesting that they say they dont keep legal documents prior to 6 years - they are actually obliged to do so in respect of money laundering and tax laws.

 

I can understand statements being shredded after 6 years.... but the actuall agreement and without even storing it on microfiche first.. oops !!!

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Delighted delbuk

 

What did I tell you no CCA no enforcement.

 

Well done for standing your corner.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

hehe

 

i'd be cheeky and reclaim the PENALTY fees now!!

 

rub their noses in it!!

 

well done!!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...