Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ex Employer being awkward about paying money owed......


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4399 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Hope someone can offer advice.

 

My husband left his old job on 20th March after being on long term sick.

He was no longer receiving any sick pay from them but on his final pay he was due to receive a months outstanding holiday pay for which the amount had been confirmed by his ex employers.

When this was paid to him they had deducted almost £700 as they stated he had been overpaid for March, even though he only got a grand total of £35 for that month.

Anyway after a lot of arguing and spreadsheets being drawn up, someone high up in payroll looked at it for him and agreed not only had they incorrectly deducted the holiday pay, they had also underpaid him on 3 other occasions during the past year!

They asked for him to return his P45 and final payslip so these could be amended and the money refunded to him.

He sent back the top part of his P45 and original payslip and they have got in touch saying they need all 3 parts of the P45 before they can refund the money they owe, but this isn't possible because they were handed to the Job centre to claim Job-seekers allowance.

 

Are they just finding excuses to mess him around or do they need his complete P45 before reworking his final payslip?

 

Thanks

Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically yes they do; the P45 is a 4 part form and all parts have to contain the same information.

However, once the P45 has been issued they can't recall it. What they should do is write you a letter on company notepaper giving details if the amended amounts.

Speak to payroll and refer them to the CWG 2 employers further guide to PAYE and NI as the instructions are contained in there. They can download it from HMRC website if they don't have a paper copy.

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply my husband will let them know this tomorrow.

 

This is the email he got from them earlier today -

 

Hi Mr ******

 

We have received Part 1A of your P45 today, but unfortunately we require all parts issued, (3&4) if we are to rework your payslip and send out an amended P45.

 

If you could return to us at your earliest convenience.

 

regards

*********

 

So I can only assume what they say here is wrong?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply my husband will let them know this tomorrow.

 

This is the email he got from them earlier today -

 

Hi Mr ******

 

We have received Part 1A of your P45 today, but unfortunately we require all parts issued, (3&4) if we are to rework your payslip and send out an amended P45.

 

If you could return to us at your earliest convenience.

 

regards

*********

 

So I can only assume what they say here is wrong?

 

Hello there.

 

I think you can assume Gbarbm knows her stuff. :) If they disagree with you, you can always refer them to HMRC's helpline or their normal contact.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes page 11 of the CWG 2 is quite clear... If the employee has already left and adjustments are made to the P45, a duplicate P45 cannot be prepared/issued.

The reason for this is that a P45 can be used for repayment purposes.

Your hubby could google CWG 2, copy and paste the section on page 11 and put it on a response e mail to the employer and see what they come back with

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

I could tell a few things about some large well known companies that would make your hair curl!

As the saying goes; you're only as strong as your weakest link, most of whom seem to be in payroll and HR

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Got the following email back from payroll today after having sent them advice regarding CWG 2 -

 

 

Hi

 

Yes this is correct, we must not issue another P45, if payments are made after leaving as your payslip will reflect the Tax and NI paid. We would then have to tax you on OTM1 code which means you would not be entitled to any tax allowance

 

However we are intending to rework your last payslip and cancel your P45 and reissue an amended P45 and payslip, therefore we will be able to use your tax allowance when calculating the underpayment. This will be financially better for you.

 

Please confirm which method you would prefer us to use. If it is the latter then we will need parts 3 and 4 of your P45 returned to us.

 

Regards

 

Surely they know his tax allowance from the payslip and part 1 of his P45 that was returned to them?

 

Are they just messing him around or does what they say make sense?

 

Thanks for any help

Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see what they are trying to do, but the point at issue is that DWP will not give you the copies they hold as it is not correct for them to do so.

The monies your hubby is due constitute a payment after date of leaving and must be treated in the way described in the CWG2.

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what he pointed out to them but they still came back with this!

He's emailed them again stating they should have all the relevant details regarding his tax code etc it's just getting really frustrating now and feel they are just going out their way to be awkward :-x

Is their anyone who he can officially complain to about their conduct in handling this refund bearing in mind he no longer works for them?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

In all honesty, they realise they have, for want of a better phrase "cocked up" and are trying to do some damage limitation in order to mitigate their error.

They probably realise that this error will be picked up on an internal audit and they will get it in the neck.

The best that can be achieved based on the existing circumstances is this;

 

1) the ex employer should pay the monies to your hubby and provide details of the date the amount was paid, the gross amount due, the tax code operated and the net amount.

 

2) Code BR(or 0T) should be operated by the employer, this will deduct tax at 20p in the pound

 

3) once full details of your husbands income are held, which will comprise the P60 from the employer he was with at 5 April (if your hubby was in receipt of JSA a P60U will be issued) and the letter regarding the monies paid from the ex employer; your hubby should pass the details to his tax office which will be the one that dealt with the previous employer, they will then deal with any refund of tax due.

 

If you need details of the tax office address, come back to me on here and I can provide them.

Edited by Gbarbm
spelling errors

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your help!

My husband basically copy and pasted your last post into an email and today they've got back saying they've processed the payment under code OTM1 Looks like they needed your advice to know what to do!

 

Thanks again

Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

No probs, glad it's sorted, just keep all the paperwork safe as he will need it to claim a refund of income tax for the period from 6 April 2011 to 5 April 2012

 

Kind regards

 

Gbarbm

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...