Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SOS Charging order in place but RBS have closed accounts


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3800 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

In 1999 the RBS got a CCJ for £59k. I never denied having a debt but I challenged the amount of debt being levied against me. They withheld statements and their solicitor refused to discuss any form of settlement prior to the CCJ. Unaware of my rights and their bullying tactics they got judgment.

 

In 2008 they applied for and got a CO for £38k.( It is a joint & several debt so hubby got one to).

 

I found CAG in 2008 and SAR'd them. For the first time since 1995 I had statements which revealed huge discrepencies in the way our accounts had been managed both pre and post judgment. We challenged the bank, the FOS took it on because of the seriousness of our complaint....after 1 year....we cannot make a decision because these accounts have been litigated on...they knew that from the outset:-x.You need to take this back to court. The FOS is a waste of time.

 

Had to put everything on hold in 2009 because hubby was diagnosed with cancer. Got through it ....all ok.

 

Anyway, in Ferbruary I phoned CMDS who are supposed to managing these accounts. They couldn't find either myself or hubby on their system.

 

Sent SAR's on 21 Feb. All I got was a data sheet with my name, address and DOB. Spoke with them directly. We do not exist, they hold no data on either of us.To date, despite sending a 7 day LBA they have been unable to comply with our request for data.

 

Phoned CMS again. The accounts have been closed. They have no record of us, the CCJ or the charging order. We have been deleted from the RBS system.

 

Has anyone come across this before ?

 

The Charging order exists to secure the debt, but according to CMS the debt nolonger exists. :???:

 

The accounts referred to in the POC have been closed.

 

Any suggestions would be really appreciated.

 

Debbie xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Debs

 

Are you still maintaining payment of the judgment and to who? PM me if you prefer to keep it off the thread.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

We stopped making payments in 2007, as soon as we did they went for the CO in March 2008.

 

Late 2008 got letter from Solicitor demanding we make payments or their client the RBS or would go for a Sale Order. Sent quite abrupt response pointing out serious irregularities that had been exposed in data held by them and their client.

 

They have not requested any money since then and we have not paid any.

 

Andy I will PM you tomorrow.

 

debbie

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem.:wink:

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi

Sorry to jump on this thread debbbbsy.

 

I am in the same situtation as you where.

CCJ Obtained.

Did not receive the court paperwork

 

now they have gone for an interim charging order which is going to court on the 14th Jan.

 

I have requested copy of the court papers which should be with me soon.

 

I have called the bank but my account has been closed and I cant pass the security questions as the account is 13 year old

and they have no information on file so how on earth did the DC get a CCJ??

 

Was it though bulk at NCC??

 

Now been transfered to my local court birmingha,.

 

Any ideas on what I can do.

 

Account was last paid in 2007.

 

No letter from LLoyds to say it had been purchased by Hillsden.

 

Any ideas and help would be great.

 

Debt for £4000 including the charges.

 

Thank you so much

Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread is from May 2012 with no further updates...I would recommend you start your own thread to attain responses.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has any cagger noticed that Hillsden are operating from Welcome Finance address.

 

I have an application to strike out their claim and counterclaim on HP car CCA sec 90/91.(ex Welcome). Solicitors Aspins.

 

I will post the pleadings after the hearing early next year.

 

I also have a load of stuff from my battle with RBS which ended in a draw/ win since I didn't pay them anything.

 

Needless to say they submitted bogus copies of the agreement.

 

Solicitors Irwin Mitchell ( see Private Eye so you know what your up against i terms of honesty)

they discontinued in the end which I stupidly agreed to.

 

In both these cases I have gone for an application to strike out.

 

I also have an impending action with Lowell/ Bryan Carter but not a very good defence.

 

However I think I found an argument against their bankruptcy debt collection tactics.

 

I will post this for the perusal of the site legal team.

 

Sorry if I have posted this in the wrong place.

Regards Pavi

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

HI

 

Sorry for not responding sooner.

 

If you didn't recieve the court docs you should have made an application to set a side the original CCJ. Have you done this?

 

When was the CCJ gained?

 

debbie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debs,

Sorry my post was just a comment.

 

I have an application hearing pending re Welcome to strike out their claim and recover my losses under CCA 90 / 91

and also to have an unfair relationship CCA sec140 decided.

 

I will post the pleadings after the hearing as this may be of use to our mutual caggers.

 

My other post was regarding misleading and omitted terms in personal loan and credit card agreements et alia.

That is to say that if they have not indicated that your home may may be lost if you do not keep up payments on your loan/card/phone agreement.

 

In any case where this is shown to have happened the OFT has a statutory duty to prosecute the offending party.

 

You will notice that all secured loan adds contain the caption

" your home is at risk if you do not keep up the payments" which is obvious!

 

It therefore follows that a loan taken out in good faith as unsecured,

should not be later become secured by the default method of bankruptcy/charging.,

except where this remedy is a term of contract.

 

Of course no sane person would sign up to a phone/card/loan agreement if it meant loosing their home if they fell on hard times.

 

It is of course also a post contract penalty which is as we know is also unlawful.

 

I think think there are many thousands of debtors who should be worried about this given the predatory nature of firms like Lowells

who amalgamate debts to bankrupt people in financial distress with unsecured loans.

 

In fact I feel a petition would be a start.

 

Look what happened with bank charges PPI.

 

Regards and a happy new year Pavi

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...