Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Schipoo and thank you for the update.   Excellent news for you and a huge relief, I imagine. You might like to start a new thread about Independent Tax if you want advice on that problem. HB
    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
    • President Ruto says Kenyans pay less tax than citizens in some other African countries.View the full article
    • As PM Sunak really showed his true colours at the D Day Commemorations by doing what? Oh I am the British PM lets just leave early I have better things to do and as he is called out on disrespecting all those veterans that served our country for the freedoms we have today he gives a groveling apology to little to late. He knew about this event for a long time and also knew that this is probably the last D Day Commemoration due to the age of those Veterans who gave so much for there countries freedom. Even on the day of the D Day Commemoration he still could have changed his plans As PM and stayed but choose not to showing such DISRESPECT to those Veterans, those that lost there lives and Families for the Freedoms we have today Being a Veteran myself I have never known a PM to show such disrespect what the hell was he thinking SHAME ON YOU PM SUNAK  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Billy Oh No!!


Ferfex Ache
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4438 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Am in need of urgent advice.

 

Was having work done in the garden via a contractor and decided to add a shed to the project. The contractor purchased the shed online for me......I chose it etc. Anyways, this was done back in February and the shed was supposed to be delivered within week or 2, except it wasn't.

 

The contractor gave up trying to chase it up as the customer services as the company selling the shed was so bad, so I took up the quest 6 weeks down the line. It took at least 8 calls to discover that although they had taken the money back in Feb, they had never put the order through for dispatch or anything. They had forgotten all about it and thought it was pretty funny.

 

I complained to the manager of the shed company by email and again by letter and was ignored. It did eventually arrive after me chasing it up with the couriers and after waiting another week to be slotted in to have it privately fitted, it was installed today complete with added extras paid by myself for lighting, sockets etc. The contractors did a brilliant job, but the shed is the worst piece of rubbish I have ever seen in my life.

 

You can see daylight between every plank of wood, the roof doesn't fit and sits well off the actual panels. I am 5' 2" tall and can barely stand up in it at the highest point and the windows are thin, cheap perspex with no seals and nothing to hold them in. I have waited 7 weeks and forked out a fortune between contractors and the actual shed company for the biggest lot of rubbish ever and it wasn't cheap I hasten to add.

 

I spent so much time and effort calling them to get the shed here in the first place and have had nothing but hassle from them so far on that point alone. The contractor is not to blame in any way, but this shed is absolute shoddy rubbish. Is there anything I can do about this? Do I have any rights?

 

Any info most welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it fit for purpose? does it fit the description? is the size the same as the advert stated as it must have given the dimensions etc?

Did the contractors fit the shed together correctly, could it be their fault the roof dosnt fit.

Once you have a comprehensive list of what is wrong and where the item dosnt fir the description then it needs to be taken up with the seller, but as the contractor purchased it i think he will have to deal with them

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi assisted blond,

 

No it is definitely not fit for purpose.

 

The roof is a cheap, poor design and shaped like a saucer along the back wall. No roof would ever fit to it. The front is badly bowed outwards. Daylight can be seen between every plank and there are more cracks and holes in it than a teabag. There is nothing to hold the bottom of the windows in place, so they rattle about and you can actually put your hands through them.

 

As far as the height goes, when I ordered it, I never for a second imagined that sheds would be sold to anyone at such a low height such as an average height man couldn't stand upright in it. If it had been advertised as a hobbit shed, then ok. I wouldn't put a dog in it and would doubt a dog would want to go in it.

 

I got some advice from Consumer Advice today and like you say, the onus falls on the poor contractor and not the mongrels who are selling this rubbish. No point in me hounding the contractor as I know any attempts made with the shed company will be in vain :sad:.

 

I can only assume that gardenbuildingsonline use bogus reviews next to their products as after doing a search online today from other sources, it turns out that there are lots and lots of angry people who have had the same problems as myself with them and their Billyoh Sheds.

 

Looks like I have lost all that money and am back to the drawing board and in search of a replacement shed before it gets windy or rains.

 

These people should not be allowed to trade rubbish and get away with it. Typically, the consumer loses again. The rip off continues until it can be stopped :ballchain:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really annoying you could perhaps just ask the contractor to write to them for you, they shouldnt get away with selling shoddy goods, i am not sure but if he was acting as your agent you may be able to speak to them yourself, long time since I studied contract law so I will have to go and have a look. if i come up with anything I will let you know.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...