Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NCC street lighting.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4357 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Firstly can I please apologise if I have posted this in the wrong section only I was struggling to decide which section was the best or most appropriate option.

 

Norfolk County Council are replacing the street lamp posts in our area. The old lamp posts are being replaced with the new lamp posts which have LCD light fittings. There is presently a street light attached to the front of my property which hasn`t yet been changed or converted. The street light is just an arm with a light on the end, the arm is attached to my property at approx bedroom window height with a cable leading along the front of my house a to power box fitted to the side of my house.

 

My question is, Does the highways department or the contractor need my permission before any work is carried out? I have already taken a photograph as a precaution but I am concerned they may have to knock off some render to accomodate a new LCD lamp.

 

I am taking the opportunity to ask these questions in advance and in anticpation of the work being carried out without my consent.

 

Many thanks for all replies and offers of advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have an agreement with NCC that they can have the light on your house? Why not just give them a ring and find out what the plan is? Also ask them what would happen if they damage your property I am sure they have insurance but get it clear before they start work.

  • Confused 1

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have an agreement with NCC that they can have the light on your house? Why not just give them a ring and find out what the plan is? Also ask them what would happen if they damage your property I am sure they have insurance but get it clear before they start work.

 

Thankyou very much for your reply. The light was already on the property when we purchased it some ten years ago. I could ring them but thought the onus should be on them to contact me, besides I`ve had experiences of ringing local authorities before, hanging on listening to music, being handed from one department to another before being informed we`ll ring you back but never receiving the call.

 

I know an ex work colleague who had a telephone pole in his garden, he used to get a yearly sum from BT for having it sited on his property (basically rent money I suppose). Just wondering if the same would apply with my property?

 

I just wanted to have some insight of my rights before any work started on replacing the light.

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you could still get them checked although if there was a covenant your solicitor would/should have told you at the time of purchase. I do think you may be entitled to some rent for the light being situated on your house and i appreciate what you are saying about hanging on the phone to the council but it might just be worth it to set your mind at rest. However should they damage your property then they will have to repair it.

dont forget to keep and date the photo.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you could still get them checked although if there was a covenant your solicitor would/should have told you at the time of purchase. I do think you may be entitled to some rent for the light being situated on your house and i appreciate what you are saying about hanging on the phone to the council but it might just be worth it to set your mind at rest. However should they damage your property then they will have to repair it.

dont forget to keep and date the photo.

 

Thanks very much for your latest reply and the suggestions you make.

 

Been thinking about the deeds and any possible covenant. Our house is approx two hundred years old so I am kind of thinking that street lighting was not an issue at that time, in which case there would be nothing mentioned.

 

Another concern regarding the light is that I have a son who works nights sometimes and sleeps during the day. Surely they would be obliged to give advance notice of any work they intend to carry out?

 

Many thanks for your continued interest in this thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they would have to tell you when they were going to start work or you could just refuse themn access to your property, I still think cost apert you do need to speak to NCC and find out what their plans are, although I did email our CC about a street lighting issue and they did get back to me within 7 days, so email may be an option.

 

Once you have found out when they intend doing the work then I suggest you try and find out if they owe you any rent!

 

Good luck

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi,

 

A wayleave agreement would have been made to install the original lantern and power supply on the property.

 

If the luminaire is attached to your property then the NCC PFI Street Lighting company (who would operate and maintain the lights for the next 25 years or so would need to obtain a wayleave with yourself in order to install/reinstall anything there (because you are within your rights to ask them to remove the equipment from your property) and they would have to make good any damage caused.

 

The proposed lantern would be possibly be an LED type and not LCD.

 

Can a freestanding column be installed anywhere in the area - see sentence above.

 

Kry10

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...