Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This time you do need to reply to them with a snotty letter to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did try court. We will help this evening.  
    • Hi, I just wanted to update the post and ask some further advice  I sent the CCA and CPR request on the 14th May, to date I have had no reply to the CCA but I received a load of paperwork from the CPR request a few days ago. I need to file the defence today and from the information I have read the following seems to be what is required.  I would be grateful if some one could confirm suitability   Claim The claim is for the sum of £255.69 due by the Defendant under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a PayPal account with an account reference of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)  The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 15-09-21, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £0.00. The Claimant claims the sum of £255.69   Defence  The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have had financial dealings with PayPal  in the past but cannot recollect the account number referred to by the Claimant. 2. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am not aware of service of a Default Notice by the original creditor the Claimant refers to within its particulars of claim.  3. Paragraph 3 is noted. On the 14/5/2024 I requested information related to this claim by way of a Section 77 request, which was received and signed for by the claimant on 20/5/2024. As of today, the Claimant has failed to respond to this request, and therefore remains in default of the section 77 request and therefore unable to enforce any alleged agreement until its compliance. 4. Therefore it is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, and the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and: (b) Show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice Pursuant to s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 5. Paypal (Europe) S.A.R.L is out of the juristriction of English Courts. 6. As per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 7. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed, or any relief.
    • Thanks @dx100ukI followed the advice given on here... then it went very quiet!  The company was creditfix I think then transferred to Knightsbridge (or the other way around) The scammer independent advisor was Roger Wallis-having checked his LinkedIn profile just this morning, it does look like he's still scamming vulnerable people... I know I was stupid for taking his advice, but i do wonder how many others he has done this to over a longer period of time (it came as a  massive shock to him when our IVA suddenly failed). Lowell have our current address (and phone numbers if the rejected calls over the past couple of days is anything to go by!) No point trying the SB because of the correspondence in 2019? Thanks
    • I have received the following letter from BW Legal today.  Also includes form if I admit the debt and wanting my income details.  Do I reply to this LETTER OF CLAIM please?  Looks like they are ready for court now??  Thank You BW Legal - Letter of Claim.pdf
    • According to Wikipedia - yeah, I know - the site is owned by Croydon Council. It's at least worth a try to contact the council and ask for a contact in The Colonnades. You could then lay it on thick about being a genuine customer and ask them to call their dogs off. It's got to be worth a try  https://www.croydon.gov.uk/contact-us/contact-us  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MS ESA and 'Next Step'?


eskimoman
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4445 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I was diagnosed in January as having MS (multiple Sclerosis).

 

This has been confirmed and i am being designated an MS nurse (due to home visit me at the end of the month).

 

I have been on (and still claiming) ESA for nearly 2 years due to panic attacks and hyper tension/anxiety.

 

I basically have severe problems with dealing with the outside world. I am at home virtually all the time and only ever go out locally to shop a little or go to my doctors/clinics.

 

When I was last called in to the Job Centre for the 'How are you doing and how we can help you' meeting, I brought them up to speed on my new situation re the MS and I was told that I need a skills assessment for a venture of theirs called 'Next Step'.

 

The letter I was sent later headed as follows:-

 

Dear Mr #######

You have been referred to the following opportunity: NEXT STEP

 

You Should report to:

Next Step Admin Team

PROSPECTS SERVICES LTD

[local Job Centre Address]

---------------------------------

 

My problem is this:-

a) I know nothing about this 'Next Step' program of theirs and why they are giving it to people on ESA. Is it mandatory?

 

b) Psychological aspects aside (and they are real) my ms in itself has caused many random disfunction in my body including involuntary bowel movement and even my entire leg going completely numb also heat spots, muscle spasms and brief pain spikes (brief at the moment that is).

 

I am just curious as to how this will play out re the job centre. I don't want to put myself in any jeopardy re my claim.

 

Also I have been waiting well over a year (nearly two) for mental health care team help (Community Recovery Service), this is now coming through and I am due a home visit via these people soon.

 

In light of my situation I would like to know more of where I stand with the JC regarding this new 'Next Step' plan for ESA people.

Can they enforce such procedures as to put somebody back into the public sector while on ESA onto a program like this when they are not fit psychologically (let alone physically) to do what it seems they require?

 

Would greatly appreciate any help with this. Thank you.

 

*as nystagmite answered the dla/Ib question, i've edited that bit out.

Edited by eskimoman
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome, eskimoman.

 

I've moved this thread to the Benefits forum.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

And is DLA applied on top of ESA or will I have to claim Incapacity Benefit first?

 

Incapacity benefit was replaced by ESA in 2008. You can claim DLA whether or not you calim ESA. You just need to prove that as someone with a disability, (your diagnosis is irrelevant) that you have care and /or mobility needs, which have lasted for at least 3 months and will last for at least another 6.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incapacity benefit was replaced by ESA in 2008. You can claim DLA whether or not you calim ESA. You just need to prove that as someone with a disability, (your diagnosis is irrelevant) that you have care and /or mobility needs, which have lasted for at least 3 months and will last for at least another 6.

 

Thanks for that info Nystagmite.

 

Still looking for anybody who has info on the 'Next Step' program for ESA people and whether it is mandatory or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that info Nystagmite.

 

Still looking for anybody who has info on the 'Next Step' program for ESA people and whether it is mandatory or not.

 

Hello there.Please bear with us until someone who knows is able to see your message. Weekends and long weekends are always quieter on the forums and you're asking a question that's pretty specific.My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that info Nystagmite.

 

Still looking for anybody who has info on the 'Next Step' program for ESA people and whether it is mandatory or not.

 

Prospects Services Ltd - who you refer to in your original post - provide 'Next Step' services on government contract. There's a bit of info here: http://www.prospects.co.uk/AboutUs/tabid/56/Default.aspx.

 

PSL appears to be a private company with government backing to deliver 'welfare to work' services. I'm not exactly sure what that entails, but an educated guess suggests it involves running classes and training programmes designed to assist benefit claimants back into work.

 

What it means for you personally - and other ESA claimants - I have no idea (and no idea if it's mandatory).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Prospects Services Ltd - who you refer to in your original post - provide 'Next Step' services on government contract.

 

What it means for you personally - and other ESA claimants - I have no idea (and no idea if it's mandatory).

 

Thanks for the link re prospects services.

 

It seems strange though that they try to get people who are actually sick & claiming ESA back into work before they are ready. The MS aside (which is bad enough!) I am only JUST starting to receive the mental health counseling that I was put forward for over a year and a half ago (via my gp psychologist referring me to CMHT).

 

The pressure for people like myself who already suffer from anxiety/panic disorder is only worsened by such actions as these.

Edited by eskimoman
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi eskimo, You should seek welfare rights advice immediately.

MIND helpline will put you in touch with someone locally info below.

You notified the department of a Change of circumstances during a meeting with an advisor, and they should have either suggested you apply for a revision or supersession of the original award of ESA WRAG and consider the Support Group. (This is why you need WR help)

If this isn't possible because (there are many rules and regs depending on your case) the other option is to make a fresh claim.

I would highlight that you already notified the Dept of this Change giving the date and person whom you spoke to. Meanwhile you should be able to defer those work focused interviews with a letter of support from your doctor or Nurse, too sick to attend.

Contact Mind infoline 0300 123 3393

We are able to provide information on a range of topics including types of mental distress, where to get help, drug and alternative treatments and advocacy. We are able to provide details of help and support for people in their own area.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and they should have either suggested you apply for a revision or supersession of the original award of ESA WRAG and consider the Support Group. (This is why you need WR help).

 

 

I spoke to the lady at the JC today via phone and she did say the WRAG was mandatory but that due to my circumstances she would send me out an appeal for the Support Group side of things. I will still have to attend the wrag in the meantime.

 

Your reply has helped me a lot though, thank you! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke to the lady at the JC today via phone and she did say the WRAG was mandatory but that due to my circumstances she would send me out an appeal for the Support Group side of things. I will still have to attend the wrag in the meantime.

 

Your reply has helped me a lot though, thank you! :)[/QUO

 

You only have 1 month from the original decision letter in which you can appeal or ask for a reconcideration, I think you will have to ask for a Supasession on the grounds your illness has deterioted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You only have 1 month from the original decision letter in which you can appeal or ask for a reconcideration, I think you will have to ask for a Supasession on the grounds your illness has deterioted.

 

When you say 'original decision letter' do you mean from the start of a wrag placement?

If this is the case I perhaps have about a week to get that into them.

It's shocking that they don't tell people at the initial stages when they are putting time limits on things like that.

 

Thanks for the advice re supercession. Does this mean update/amend a claim?

I don't think the ESA people are even aware of my MS yet (though the JC is).

Not really certain of the protocol for something such as this.

Should I phone them (esa) and bring them up to date or let the job centre handle it?

 

Again, many thanks for all your advices, i'm very glad that this site exists.

Edited by eskimoman
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...