Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No SAR yet but they have confirmed via email that they have everything and will supply it by this month end.    When you say the FOS considered it a personal loan due to personal guarantee who is the FOS? Financial Ombudsman?  But then that doesn’t make sense as they haven’t been involved yet.    Santander in their final response to my original complaint did not agree to it. They turned my complaint down and specified that the selling dealership had agreed to treat it as personal for settlement purposes.    I guess they could not agree to it as then they would be guilty of miss selling but they gave me what I wanted by saying I would not get treated as a business customer in regards to finance charges.    Awful bank to deal with. Will never touch them again. 
    • Background I am in dispute with Clerical Medical over, amongst other things, statements that I haven't received. They didn't resolve my complaint in time so invited me to complain to the FOS, which I did The FOS investigator in his findings has written that  Clerical Medical have provided all missing statements apart from two. One of these is for the policy year 2021 - 2022, which they say is unavailable due to a system migration. I have twice asked the FOS investigator for a copy of his screen shot to try and resolve this discrepancy but they have ignored me so today I submitted a subject access request. I said I was primarily interested in the screen shot but I also asked for everything they held against the complaint reference number. The response I got from firstly the Data Protection Operations Senior Coordinator, then secondly the investigator was that  The investigator expanded on this and said I'll wait the 40 days and see what they come back with then make a decision on next steps at that point, but I want to make sure I've got my facts in the right order before I start arguing with them. They seem to be saying that my SAR doesn't cover the screen shot because it isn't personal data but I disagree. I have a reference number that identifies my complaint and therefore indirectly identifies me. I think that means everything that is held against that reference number, including the screen shot, is my personal data and is in scope of my SAR (subject to exemptions). Who is right?
    • You sure it's a Section 48 notice? Section 48 notice is just telling you who your landlord is. Have they sold and they're just telling you who your new landlord is or is it an actual eviction notice? Might be best scanning it up just in case here.
    • Well it will be given the priority attention given the hearing is close its bad form that the court did not inform you that sanctions had been applied and the claim struck out. Lets hope they inform you this time if the hearing is to proceed.  Their application involves a remote hearing and no you would not be expected to participate.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Formal Notification - Order for Questioning


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4357 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The default is definitely unfair after such a long time.

Yes demand the exact source of the alleged payment.

Check Trustonline for the CCJ there is a fee.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI

 

I just checked my previous address which I left in 2007, there is now a CCJ on there showing as UNSATISFIED JUDGEMENT dated 08/11/11. Is this really playing ball after a default was registered 7 years ago????

 

What beats me up is they sent to my previous address then 4 months later write to me here? How bizzarre

 

Quite strange as there is definately no entry on my experian credit files....

 

Any ideas where I can defend or not defend myself as the case may be???

 

I am going to track the payments as well, I am very certain I never paid anything since I moved home as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is certainly reaching into the depths

of unfairness and needs careful consideration

on how to proceed.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought, would sect 24 of the limitations act have any impact on this one?

 

I also sent a letter to Wescot today asking for th source of funding including bank name and transaction code, plus any copies of correspondence they have to demonstrate thier efforts to ensure I receive CCJ notification. (I changed bank accounts in 2007 & know that there was definately no payments made to Wescot from my new account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received a door step caller tonight, a postman from my local county court.

 

Served me with a notice to attend court on 13th June @ 10.00, a lengthy document asking me to produce income & expenditure, bank statements, proof of rent/mortgage, utility bills and all sorts of things including my assetts if any. (I only own outright a motorbike which is valued in region of £2000.00 private sale) (Quite concerned about this factor, just paid finance off in November 2010)

 

Thinking about going to CAB to see if I can find more information given it`s now 2 weeks since I rang the court and asked for any copies of particulars and still nothing received.

 

Clutching at straws here but is there any impact on section 24 Limitations act as default is 7 years old then CCJ appears and a notice of questioning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't see how limitations can apply

payment made in 2008, but the time

scales are unfair.

Please use your local CAB and ask for

an advisor familair with these circumstances.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

See post #23. you need to get this set aside then you need to defend. You don't beleive you made a payment and it they wil have to prove it is NOT SB'd which means proving you did make a payment; a bit hard when you know you changed bank accounts and didn't make one! one step at a time. now go get this set aside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally received details from my local county court, certainly took a while, 2 phone calls and a letter to get the information, still I have copied below word fpor word excluding account number.

 

 

The claim is 1980.81 being monies owing to the claimant in respect of a credit agreement between MBNA and the defendant under account number xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

The agreement was terminated as the defendant failed to maintain the agreed terms.

In accordance with the pre-action protocols the claimant has attempted to contact the defendant and agree a repayment plan. The defendant has failed to respond or maintain a suitable arrangement.

MBNA has sold and assigned all rights, title and interest, under this agreement to wescot spv limited and claimant claims interest pursuant to section 69 of the county court act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from 07/08/2008 to 13/10/2011 totalling £504.04 and thereafter at a daily rate of £0.43 to date of judgement or sooner.

Amount of claim £2484.85

Court fee £75.00

Solicitors costs £80.00

Total amount £2639.85

I have also been in contact with CAB, I was advised I need to report both organisations to FSA, CCA and FSO, not entirely sure where that will get me but interesting that the CAB representative openly said she smelt a rat given it is over 4 years since payment made, 8 years since origional default and they mysteriously write to me at my correspondence address 4 months after CCJ reported on Trust site.

 

I was asked if I had been on electoral role, of course I have and have checked my files to make sure I was and hey presto I am so why could they not find me then? As CBA say, I smell a rat and underhand tactics.

 

I have also written to wescot for the 4th time now, under freedom of information act I have asked for copeis of all documents on a file they hold on me, still nothing received, they are certainly dragging thier feet because I want something now.

 

I am in court on 13th June, but I am hoping to make an application to have this set aside before, but until wescot reply I have eliments of doubt, after all I have to pay out £80.00 but need to see the value in this prior to application.

 

Any thoughts folks?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just looking to see if there is any further advice?

 

Wescot have not supplied or even acknowledged my letter to date, still I know they have a timeframe to work to which is after my court date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Freedom of Information Act doesn't apply here. I would advise you act quickly without waiting for Wescot. Find a Solicitor who gives the first interview free (yellow Pages etc) and ask them for advice. Wescot are trying it on, and succeeding. YOU have to put forward the S B defence if it applies, and have the CCJ set aside as they look as though they deliberately sent it to your previous address in order to get a Judgement by default

CAB is OK, but you need advice fast.

I am a lawyer, but I am an academic lawyer. I do not practice as a barrister or solicitor. You should consult a practising Solicitor BEFORE taking any Court or other action

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't see how limitations can apply

payment made in 2008, but the time

scales are unfair.

Please use your local CAB and ask for

an advisor familair with these circumstances.

 

Brig, from reading, it looks like the convenient payment that reset the SB clock may be one of those VERY convenient payments that appear on debts when the DCA realises the debtor understands what SB means, you know, the ones people never remember paying, and which no proof of can be found....

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's too late for all this. You need some proper advice re procedures. The CCJ has to be set aside and quickly. The proof or otherwise of payments will come out then. Not attending the questioning is contempt of Court and will mean prison until you purge your contempt. Wescot are trying it on. You need to see a Solicitor, and quickly. CAB won't be enough for this case as time is of the essence.

Worry about evidence of payments later at the set aside hearing.

Ultimately, it's up to you, but whatever you do, you have to do it quickly

I am a lawyer, but I am an academic lawyer. I do not practice as a barrister or solicitor. You should consult a practising Solicitor BEFORE taking any Court or other action

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's too late for all this. You need some proper advice re procedures. The CCJ has to be set aside and quickly. The proof or otherwise of payments will come out then. Not attending the questioning is contempt of Court and will mean prison until you purge your contempt. Wescot are trying it on. You need to see a Solicitor, and quickly. CAB won't be enough for this case as time is of the essence.

Worry about evidence of payments later at the set aside hearing.

Ultimately, it's up to you, but whatever you do, you have to do it quickly

 

I agrree with rameses the priority is to go for set-aside as time is of the essence.

 

In the meantime I would check out the credit reference agency credit files with both experian and equifax and and focus on the previous searches section to see if wescot have left a footprint for an outstanding debt trace. ( equifax would be best for this as they hold searches for two years as opposed to 1 year for experian)

If they have left a footprint for a debt trace search and this pre-dates the new ccj, then this begs the question why have wescot sent a county court claim to a previous address when a trace would have given your new address.

This will also give you ammo towards a succesfull set-aside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

A quick update folks!!!!

I attended as requested to be welcomed by a party of two, (No judge), they sat there whilst I completed an internal court form which pretty much duplicated everything I had researched and prepared. Typical income and expenditure, they wanted to see payslips, proof of everything I was saying and why I had not paid any monies since the CCJ was implemented.

Upon me saying I never received any notification and the first correspondence received in over 5 years was a notification order for questioning they asked if I was going to request set aside. A good conversation was held, they kept telling me they could not advise but mentioned set aside 5 to 6 times in a short time – they even went away to get me an application form to which is now completed and will be actioned next week when I am back in the town.

The outcome is I advised I was not in a position to make an offer of payment at this time, my rationale is that I firmly believe the payments have been fabricated, Wescot are being extremely evasive and are not fulfilling my repeated requests.

In terms of my requests from Wescot I have done a SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST to which they only sent me what looks like screen dumps on internal systems, when I read through them there are comments detailing a total of 17 letters sent to me which I never received, looks like they engaged someone called Mack Hall? Don’t know who they are. So I have decided to play hard ball with Wescot and try to make it difficult for them.

I have now asked for the following and advised it still comes under the original subject access request where the fee is paid and has been acknowledged. I also included a copy of my original letter which does include the below.

1) A certified true copy of the original credit agreement which I think is from 2001.

2) Certified true copies of all written correspondence sent to me inclusive of any received from me.

3) Certified true copies of all correspondence to and from third parties.

4) Certified true copies of all emails internal and external relating to this case.

5) Certified true copies of all telephone transcripts.

6) A detailed explanation of any automated decisions that have been made about me

I have reported Wescot to the Financial Ombudsman Service from recommendation of the CAB.

A quick question, is there any recommendations I should consider with supporting documentation for my set aside application?

Thanks all

Link to post
Share on other sites

A clue here is the set-aside metioned, if they keep reinterating it, look into the posibility as they said they cannot advise (Set aside - set-aside se- aside set-aside) here is a form should you wish to set - aside.)..other will comment on this as well no doubt.

 

Good Luck. peeps will advise soon .

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

All and any docs you have!

 

Please be aware that you may NOT get a copy of the agreement

with the SAR.

 

The ICO has stated that they would ''expect'' the agreement to

be supplied but there is actually no legislative obligation to do so.

CCA 1974 setions 77/78 cover the production of agreemenrs regulated

under the act.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...