Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Head teacher doesn't want me to park on zig zag lines


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4117 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I can see both sides - if the school bus is there to allow the children access without having to cross roads or (more likely) because there are so many parents parked down the road it's impractical for it to park elsewhere then I understand. If it's parked there despite suitable safe access elsewhere, that's a different story.

 

The school bus that dropped of kids at my daughters old junior school used to park on the zig-zags to let them off, but if you saw that road during the school run you'd understand why they did it. The whole street was an accident waiting to happen.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Nope, the law is the law.... the zig zag lines are there so that children crossing the road are able to see a good distance in both directions to avoid traffic... NOT for the school bus to park on.

 

Either everyone can park there.

 

Or no one can.

 

And

that

is

that

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope, the law is the law.... the zig zag lines are there so that children crossing the road are able to see a good distance in both directions to avoid traffic... NOT for the school bus to park on.

 

Either everyone can park there.

 

Or no one can.

 

And

that

is

that

 

What law would that be then?? There is no law that states you cannot park on school zig zags.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Highway Code says " Many of the rules in the Code are legal requirements, and if you disobey these rules you are committing a criminal offence. You may be fined, given penalty points on your licence or be disqualified from driving. In the most serious cases you may be sent to prison. Such rules are identified by the use of the words ‘MUST/MUST NOT’. In addition, the rule includes an abbreviated reference to the legislation which creates the offence."

 

Section 238 says " You MUST NOT wait or park, or stop to set down and pick up passengers, on school entrance markings (see 'Road markings') when upright signs indicate a prohibition of stopping. "

 

However, germish has said there are no signs indicating prohibition, which means in this particular case it is not illegal due to non-conformity as I see it.....which brings us back to the moral stance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:bored::bored:

Last comment from me on this, I would suggest that Germish concentrates his energy on prehaps volunteering at an advice centre or similar where his obvious enjoyment in reasearching and looking for legislation etc will be of use to the wider community.

He appears to have made his mind up on the issue of parking by the School and it will make no difference what anyone on here says, he appears to be entrenched in the situation now whether or not anyone else in his village agrees with him or is bothered by the situation.

It would seem that neither common sense, lack of interest , critizism or making light of the situation will change either his opinion or attitude and therefore he has no need of help or assistence from this forum as nothing will alter his opinion.

  • Haha 1

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Germish I suppose you dont have much support from other local parents and have you thought of how difficult you can be making the situation for your children at the school, dont supposed you have but most children especially in a small local school will soon become aware of their parents falling out with the teachers/head teacher and it can make things very uncomfortable for them. In my opinion we could all spend time looking at regulations and challanging things but most of us save our energies for important things. You are coming over in your posts as arrogant and argumentative not the best way to sort anything out, if you keep on like this you will probably find that you are fairly much oustracised by the school and other parents and this will affect your children. if you want support for you campaign i would suggest you contact some loony far left extremists, sadly for you, most people on this forum are decent normal human beings with a modicom of common sense, somthing you appear to be lacking. this is my last comment on the matter as I feel there is nothing that any rational person can say to you to make you see the ridiculous nature of this argument.

 

Thought this was your last comment blondie on 29th March??

:lol::lol::lol:
Link to post
Share on other sites

:confused::confused:

It was but i got wound up again Chaddywol, then again I am blonde and it is assisted (not natural) and I was probably having a senior moment !! your time will come Ha Ha x

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:confused::confused:

It was but i got wound up again Chaddywol, then again I am blonde and it is assisted (not natural) and I was probably having a senior moment !! your time will come Ha Ha x

 

already has I think! Lol

:lol::lol::lol:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
Zig Zags, painted pink with yellow spots, signed or unsigned, if there is a school there and children are crossing don't park there! Why do we need the wrong or rights of any traffic regs when common sense should tell you not to park where it may make it difficult for children to be SAFE!

 

PS: that goes for the school bus as well!

 

I agree! So much so I started my own campaign to hopefully put a stop to the selfish and lazy idiots that do it at the primary school near me...

 

[edit]

Edited by ims21
no external ilnks without permission - dx siteteam
Link to post
Share on other sites

why do newbies keep posting here

 

its almost a year old thread now...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Saw a guy getting done on the zigzags this morning, quite right to.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

why do newbies keep posting here

 

its almost a year old thread now...

 

dx

 

"Newbies" keep posting here because they find it while searching in Google and it is perhaps relevant to an issue they are currently experiencing?

 

Does it matter if the thread is 1 day or 10 years old? The matter is still a topic of debate because zig zag lines still exist outside schools.

 

If you don't want "newbies" posting then close the thread.

Edited by markwilla
Typos
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...