Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st Credit debt collectors re old Visa Associates loan, now Citi-financial


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4278 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 133
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Letter to the Compliance Manager 1ST Credit.

 

Ref: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

I refer to your letter dated xx xx xxxx in which you atempt to refute my claim that the alleged debt for £xxxx is statute barred because you received a letter from me dated xx xx xxxx, I do not acknowledge any debt to 1ST Credit as my letter was sent only in regard to a DISPUTE on the alleged debt which had NOT been rectified by the original creditor.

 

I therefore contend that my letter does not constitute an admission of liability as laid down in the OFT Guidance on Debt Collection 2003/2011 Appendix B,

at B7. The Guidance states: A relevant acknowledgment will normally be made by performance of the debtor (or his representative). For example making payments,or by making An unequivocal written admission that the obligation still subsists.

This quite obviously is not the case here.

 

You also allege that a payment was made by me on xx xx xxxxx to a third party namely xxxxxxxxxxxxx, I categorically deny that I made any such payment thence your claim is refuted.

 

1ST Credit must produce irrefutable proof that any such payment was made, as I have no knowledge of the company you claim the payment was allegedly made to.

 

If a card payment was made you must supply the following details:

1. The name on the face of the card.

2. The name of the card issuer.

3. The 16 digit card number and the 3 digit security code.

4 The expiry date of the card.

5. The date (exact) of the alleged payment.

6.The amount of the alleged payment.

If a cheque payment was made:

1. The name of the bank the cheque was drawn on.

2. The Cheque number and account number shown on the face of the cheque.

3. The name of the drawer.

4. The date on the face of the cheque

5. The amount allegedly paid.

For all other payment types the details as laid out must be provided.

 

Unless this information is provided I cannot enter into any further correspondence on this matter, having

now researched 1ST Credit quite thoroughly given the unenviable reputation I find for your company I must

insist on the proofs laid out above.

 

For clarification I have not admitted any liability for the alleged debt and I have not at anytime made any payment

to any other debt collection agency.

 

I expect your reply within 7 days.

 

Send recorded delivery to The Compliance Manager ( marked CONFIDENTIAL).

 

Good Luck.

 

Just made a few corrections :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received a standard reply from 1st crud saying they've passed the cca request to citi to be fulfilled. They say the account is on hold until such time as they send the documents to me.

 

I'm a little confused now. I received a notice of assignment from 1st crud sometime ago, yet they are going back to citi for the documents. Going through some of the other paperwork received from them they say they purchased they debt in 2006?? I just seems like bull all the way through.

 

With a CCA request, what would be they next likely steps on the basis of :-

 

1. No agreement

2. Recon agreement

Or

3. The original agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

the next likely step will be they wil sell it on a phishign list

 

or

 

sen a discount letter.

 

= BEGGING LETTER , you've found us out.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

With Citi and 1st crud more likely a recon. + a stetement.

 

These debts are sold with the absolute minimum of details.

For clarification please when was the last payment or written acknowledgment made?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

last payment was april 2005 and no written acknowledgement to date, the letter you drafted for me brig rebutted thier claims of acknowledgment.

 

Althouh they have written to me acknowedging my letter and passing it to citi and also confirming the account is on hold do I still send the failed to comply letter after the 17th septemeber (that will be 12 + 2 working days)?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the account showing on your credit files?

 

Because if your last post is accurate no payment or acknowledgment since April 2005 this debt is statute barred, so send the following by recorded delivery to 1ST Credit addressed to the Compliance Manager.

 

Ref: as on their letters.

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Formal Notice.

 

I refer to the debt for £xxxx Which 1ST Credit allege is owed by me, please take note I do not acknowledge any debt to your company or any company you may claim to represent.

 

I have now taken advice on this matter and have researched my credit history and have concluded that any such alleged debt is statute barred, given this information I will not now or at any time inthe future make any payment or offer of payment regarding this alleged debt.

 

You will now cease to process and store all date relating to me with immediate effect.

 

I am fully aware of the Limitations Act 1980 and the OFT Guidance on Debt Collection 2003/2011 and specifically the sections regarding the pursuit of statute barred debts.

 

I now consider this matter closed.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...