Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell using SD for old BC debt **WON WITH COSTS**


Noumidia
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4207 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

make a payment now so the balance is under £750.

 

There's an argument for an abuse of process as they are attempting to circumvent statute. The CCA 1974 sets out requirements lenders must follow for enforcement.

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I received a court letter regarding the SD

 

1) The creditor shall by 4 pm on the 12/06/12 file with court and send to Mr xxxxx a statment exhibiting all documents upon which they intend to rely in support of the debt.

 

My question is if they provide all the document i asked for can i add in my application that the account is in dispute regarding the credit card charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would mention it, but it would continue outside of any court proceeding as well. If the SD was to stand and they ever moved towards bankruptcy, then any issues about charges could be addressed at that time.

 

No expert on this. I think the SD is only an enabling device that can then be used for bankruptcy proceedings, if the debt cannot be resolved by other means.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

In the court letter regarding the SD:

 

1) The creditor shall by 4 pm on the 12/06/12 file with court and send to Mr xxxxx a statment exhibiting all documents upon which they intend to rely in support of the debt.

 

2)The applicant (me) Mr xxxxxx shall by 4 pm 10/07/12 file with the court and send to the creditor a statment in reply.

 

3) The court day is 14/08/2012.I was told by the district judge that if Lowell miss the deade line then write to me to inform the court that they defaulted.

 

My question is there any special template letter? or what happen next

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could edit something along the lines of this and send recorded delivery to the court)

 

Dear Sir / Madam

 

Case reference:

 

In the case of (Nasty DCA vs XXXXX)

 

On request of District Judge (name) I wish to inform the court / District Judge (name) and in line with the order of the court

 

That the claimant has failed to file any statement / documentation by the given deadline.

 

In light of the abuse of the insolvency rules, the defendant now requests a strikeout with an order for costs against the claimant.

 

I hereby declare that the facts laid out above in this statement are true.

 

(signed)

 

(dated)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I requested a SAR from Barclay Bank on 21/05/12 relating credit cards, however i have not received any reply from them, is there a template letter to follow? or do i need to call them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I requested a SAR from Barclay Bank on 21/05/12 relating credit cards, however i have not received any reply from them, is there a template letter to follow? or do i need to call them.

 

They have 40 days to respond from the date they receive the letter, I take it you sent it Recorded Delivery?

Once 40 days are up allow 2 days then if not received you then go to I.C.O. website and fill in a complaint form giving dates etc.

 

ICO must be getting fed up with the complaints about companies not complying with the rules, good maybe they start fineing them.

 

HSBC got a slap on this one after I complained.

Edited by Old Cogger
:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I received my SAR this morning, however i am very disapointed of what they send.

Barclays are using their dirty tricks again when dealing with customer complaint.

 

They send the following documents.

  1. Credit Agreement.( PPI not tick)
  2. Dozens of corresponding letters.
  3. Data protection act reporting,

which contains

  1. a history of communications,
  2. credit limit increase,
  3. missing payments,
  4. last payment,
  5. Default notice,
  6. date PPI was cancelled,
  7. date the a/c was sold
  8. a load of usless information.

They never send a statment which shows

  1. transaction
  2. charges
  3. PPI and life insurance.
  4. I requested SAR for 2 Accounts and they send incomplete information only for one A/C.

I am preparing a letter before action (ConsumerWiki - Data Protection Act: Non-Compliance,template 2).

Thank you 42man for all your assistance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today,I received a letter from the court relating (see #33):

You letter dated xxxxxxxx was reffered to the District Judge who has directed that requests will be considered at the hearing on xxx August.

My problem is that i am not available during the date of the hearing and i dont know what to do. Do i delay the case ? which will cost about £80.

Please any help and thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get the date changed or attend, too many people it seems do non appearance and loose, it is an important matter, and reading lowell threads you have to be careful , but others may be able to assist you with an idea , let us see.

Edited by Old Cogger
:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I can not attend because during this date i will be abroad and if change the date can i add the the cost to the claim ? or Can Lowell submit new evidences.At the moment the case is in my favour because they defaulted to submit the documents asked by the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received my SAR this morning for both credit card accounts.However, the transactions were dated from 06/2004 to 06/2012 and the card were issued:

  1. Barcalaycard was issued 05/1997 and was sold on 06/2006, i know i canceled PPI on 02/2004, card protection, live insurance.
  2. Barclaycard (Mastercard) was issued 06/2000 till 2007, In the statement they dont show when they took about £800 from my current a/c on 11/2010.

So i am unable to claim charges on both account or to proove that the debt in Mastercard is less than £750.I send yesterday a letter before action requesting that "If you do not hold certain things / information then you have to confirm this in writing too ".

Link to post
Share on other sites

I phone the court yesterday,asking them to change the hearing day, and i explained to them that the case is an insolvency case, the operator firstly said :"you need a N form." and i replied :" Is not a civil case" and then he put me on hold for few minute and said :"you need to fill a form 7.1.A and cost £70 ".I phone, twice and those courts operator are useless, I still dont know what to do and i am going away next week. Is anyone there had the some problem?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...