Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yep. they are all simply trading names of perch to try and scam people into thinking their debt is going up some kind to mystical legal chain...which is BS. all dca's pull these stunts and have done since the late 1970's
    • just type no need to hit quote. what you really need to do is forget about it now they have  just steer clear of THAT ONE STORE for a few months. other B&Q's are OK. even if you do go back in, they'll simple ask you to leave, then if you return again, could invoke trespass laws BUT WE HAVE NEVER SEEN IT HERE. as for getting out of your tree about police, prison, criminal record, arrested, knocks at doors, letter of claim....NONE OF THE CAN EVER HAPPEN. and has not on these joe public low level shoplifting incidence since 2012. you've already got a scary letter ratchetting on about some mystical FAKE civil restoration scheme .  you'll probably get a few more ...NOTHING THEY CAN EVER DO. bin shred burn give to your pet hamster any money people pay CRS/RLP/DEF etc regarding their letters goes straight into their pocket and off they go down the pub and LAUGH at people they mugged. the retailer never sees a penny.  i admire your action of send £5 to B&Q. its done now and its over with....move on with your live. dx
    • 4.  Under The Pre-Action Protocol 201?, a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior too and including ,The Pre action Protocol Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claimform dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 9.   The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2nd February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. re: 13 & 15...they dont need to produce the deed, thats a private b2b document only the judge can demand sight of. i would remove 13 totally as within their WS they have produced the Notice Of Assignment. and delete it from 15 a few ideas. dx  
    • Underp04 (I think it was him) put up the statement IDR used in court from some supposed expert mr edge. can you find it? It stated 10 years was the statute barred limit but also that the laws were very confusing. very much worth digging out!
    • You'll be fine don't worry.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice Needed for Husband and Wife DLA & Carers Allowance


Paige12
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4412 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm hoping someone might be able to advise. I am on DLA Low Mobility and Mid Care. My husband claims Carer's Allowance for me and due to this we get couple rate Income Support. This has been the situation for the last couple of years.

 

My husband has been very ill in recent months and has just received High Care and High Mobility DLA.

 

I am confused as to what premiums we can apply for and also how this affects the Carer's Allowance he is paid. Can I now claim Carers Allowance for him so we would both be claiming carers allowance for one another?

 

Also what premiums are we allowed to claim and would this affect our entitlement to Income Support?

 

I've tried searching for information but I'm more confused than ever.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not wishing to be rude but how can one ill person be paid carers to look after the person who is being paid to look after them?

 

Surely if they are ill enough to require a carer themselves then they are not able to be a carer for someone else?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not wishing to be rude but how can one ill person be paid carers to look after the person who is being paid to look after them?

 

Surely if they are ill enough to require a carer themselves then they are not able to be a carer for someone else?

 

I'm not sure but think it is possible. I think technically 'caring for someone' can mean watching over someone so one person can watch over the other and vice versa even if they are both ill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've tried researching dwp site and it does seem to say that a husband and wife both claiming mid/higher rate dla can claim carers allowance for each other?

 

Yes.

 

There is no rule saying that 2 disabled people can't claim for each other. As long as the care needs don't contradict the help each person gives.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes.

 

There is no rule saying that 2 disabled people can't claim for each other. As long as the care needs don't contradict the help each person gives.

 

Thanks for that. So I would need to put in a claim for Carers Allowance and also we would need to claim the enhanced disability premium?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not wishing to be rude but how can one ill person be paid carers to look after the person who is being paid to look after them?

 

Surely if they are ill enough to require a carer themselves then they are not able to be a carer for someone else?

1 could be physically ill and need physical care and 1 can be mentally ill and need emotional support

Link to post
Share on other sites

An example of how it's possible...

 

Person A posesses the manual skills to be able to wash and dress themselves, but cannot do so to an acceptable level, because they have a mental health condition that means they need frequent prompting, encouragement, motivation, etc. from another person.

 

Person B has no issues with the mental health side of things but is physically disabled to the point that they cannot wash and dress themselves without assistance from another person.

 

So, Person A does the manual tasks that take care of both his and Person B's washing and dressing needs, and Person B provides the 'motivation' that enables Person A to carry out these tasks.

 

Being 'ill', as stated above, doesn't preclude the ability to care for someone else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Paige,

you have two options here,

you need to Inform IS straight away as you are entitled to Enhanced DP. £14.05

 

You can claim Carers Allowance for your husband

but if you dont then you are entitled to single rate Severe Disability premium as a couple, because he gets DLA middle rate care.

If you claim CA then its

the extra carers premium at £31 or if you dont then its single SDP at £55.30

so its up to you :)

I am taking it you have no one else over 18 living with you, eg children

I

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want to make sure I've got it right. So if I claim carers allowance then we would be £31 better off per week.

 

Whereas if I don't claim carers allowance we'd get a severe disability premium of £55.30.

 

So would we be financially better off then claiming the severe disability premium instead of the carers allowance?

 

Thanks in advance. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

My husband has rang IS today and informed them of his DLA award and about the Enhanced Disablity Premium. The woman said she would sort it out . He asked about me claiming Carers Allowance for him and she said can do all that for us in IS. I imagine she'll send out a carers allowance form for me to fill in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes you would get the couple rate EDP sorry so correct there :)

 

but you are entitled to single SDP, on the claim if you dont claim CA for your husband thats £55.55 extra.....

 

and if you do claim CA you would get an extra £31 thats the CP, you would of course get the CA but as you know its taken fully in to account.

so £24.55 better of per week with out CA...... and getting the single SDP

but you will have to decide which way to go

 

I would say you havent got paid today as DLA has downloaded onto your claim and stopped payment.

easily rectifified hope you got it sorted

 

Arrears of the EDP will be backdated to the date of the award of the DLA

Couple rate :)

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the help. I'll have to get on to IS next week and see what has happened with the payment that was due today. So it's probably looking like we'd be financially better off per week with husband claiming the Severe Disability Premium instead of me claiming Carers Allowance. We can inform them of that when we ring to sort out what happened with the payment this week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick question regarding if anything changed with my DLA. I'm on the mid-care so if they changed me to low care at any stage my husband would lose his Carers Allowance which in turn would mean we would lose Income Support. In that case, could we then stop the Severe Disability Premium for my husband and change to me claiming Carers Allowance so that our income support would continue? Would they let us swap over claims like that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick question regarding if anything changed with my DLA. I'm on the mid-care so if they changed me to low care at any stage my husband would lose his Carers Allowance which in turn would mean we would lose Income Support. In that case, could we then stop the Severe Disability Premium for my husband and change to me claiming Carers Allowance so that our income support would continue? Would they let us swap over claims like that?

 

 

yes, if you went on to low rate care then his CA would cease but he would get an eight week run of IS under those circumstances, in that time you coud make a claim to CA for your husband and then make the claim to IS in your name,

 

At the end of the eight week run on your clam for CA would be up and running and away you would go,

You could put the new claim in then

 

The SDP on the old claim would remain in payment untill your CA is in payment.....:)

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...