Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

old Lombard CCJ/CO - shoe's Want more than the Judge Ordered


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4461 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone help with this one, Lombards took my partner to Court and he was given a CCJ plus they were also granted a deed to his house. They now want an updated expenditure form to review payments I guess, but should he ask for his original credit agreement??? evn though it has gone through court???

 

 

Mashmallow8-):mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt is subject to a CCJ then there is no point asking for a copy of the CCA. However, they cannot up the payments, they were set by the judge. Tell them to bog off ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the court made an order with regards to payments you comply with that, you do not have to respond to Lombards. If they want an increase in payments they would have to apply to the court to do so & have a very good reason.

 

 

e7y0eb.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hello Guys and Girls,

 

Just wondered if anyone could help. We had a unsecured loan with Lombards when eventually because of arrears they took it to court and placed a charging order alongside. This was about 2 years ago still paying it. Today they have passed the debt onto Arden who will now be collecting it. Can they do this seeing as it was through the court?

 

Many thanks

 

 

Mashmallow

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Cerb,

 

Its been a long time since we talked, I have missed you, sad aint I. Can you please spare me a couple of minutes.

My partner had an unsecured loan from Lombards went through the court and the DJ agreed he paid back £20 per month, Lombards did not turn up in court. A week later or there so notification was sent that they had put a charge on his/our property which we did not contest, knowing none the less. Paid off £20 per month the debt from about

£4000 has about £2300 left. Now the debt has been passed to Ardmore DCA to collect the payments. All I want to know is can they do this as it had gone through the courts. Also I asked for the credit agreement which they sent,

a dark photocopy of an unreadable agreement that looks like a scrap bit of paper.

 

What chance have we got in an argument?

 

I would really appreciate your assistance in this matter.

 

many thanks

 

Mashmallow

 

XXX

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Any advice please,

 

 

Had a paersonal loan with Lombards,

 

 

fell into arrears,

 

 

taken to court,

 

 

payment of £20 was agreed by DJ at the time,

 

 

at the same time a charging order was placed on the property which we did not know.

 

 

Now the debt has been passed on the Shoosh..

 

 

they are asking for and I/E form to be completed in order for them to review payments,

 

 

Every time they phone I shout a load of abuse and then they ring again next day.

 

 

I told them if they wanted anything more to take it back to court but they carry on calling continually.

 

 

I am sure they have no right to know our income when the DJ has already agreed we pay 20.00 per month.

 

 

Please tell me if I am wrong or right and how to deal with these people.

Edited by honeybee13
Problem word edited.
Link to post
Share on other sites

quite correct

 

inform the court they are trying to over rule a judgement

 

and the oft for harrassment

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh and get reclaiming

 

most lomabard loans are +50% PENALTY FEES and PPI

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you ever so much site team I will inform the court - how do I claim for the charges when I have no records to hand.Please help, also is there a standard letter to reclaim?regards,Just for info Spratts was the original solicitors who took us to court and now passed it over to Shoosmiths

Link to post
Share on other sites

you'll need all the statements for the loan

 

sar lombards or wjho you were/are paying

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Site team,

 

I have looked into some of my paperwork and found the origin claim form from Banbury County court,

 

I cannot find the judgement one.

 

At that time we sent in an I/E sheet stating that my partner could only afford £20 and it was agreed to date.

 

The charge order was at Romford Court on a seperate occasion whilst the debt was being dealt with at Banbury.

 

Shoosmiths are still harassing and demanding an I/E sheet to be completed otherwise further action.

 

Where does he stand with this.

 

I have already sent off an harrassment letter and also a SAR.

 

Please can you help with this matter.

 

Regards,

 

 

Mashmallow

Link to post
Share on other sites

only a judge can demand an I&E sheet

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...