Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
    • Am in the middle of selling my house but it's been held up as still showing a change on the property from welcome finance, have not had any contact from them for years or prime credit and need this sorting asap As far as am aware the loan was paid of some 8 years ago
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

TUPE question RE: Change to annual leave.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4204 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi. I'm hoping one of you could give me a bit of advise.

 

We transferred to a new employer back in July 2009 and things have run quiet smoothly. Ts and Cs from our old contracts were honoured and we've been happy with the transfer.

 

A few days ago, quiet a few of us got letters stating that our annual leave entitlement had been reviewed and our new entitlement (starting April 1st) would be 8.4 days a year less.

 

Our current entitlement is 28 days x 12 hour shifts.

 

Our new entitlement will be 19.6 days x 12 hour shifts.

 

Somebody has printed off some literature stating that 19.6 days a year is correct for the shifts we work. (4 12 hour shifts on, 4 days off) the information was printed off from direct.gov.

 

My questions.

 

The letter was received just before the 1st of march, we've been told that the letters were rushed out to ensure we all got the correct notice (obviously 1 calendar month). I assumed that anything to do with TUPE was 90 days notice??

 

I have a copy of my original contract with my previous employer clearly stating 24 days a year annual leave (this increased to 28 days early in my employment with my previous employer) I also have supporting wage slips from my previous employer which clearly shows I was receiving 28 days annual leave x 12 hour shifts. I've also received 28 days x 12 hour shifts for the last 2 1/2 years with my new employer.

 

Questions were asked RE: holiday entitlement when the new employer first took over. I provided them with my original contract and they reinstated my entitlement back to 28 days per year x 12 hour shifts.

 

Hope it all makes sense! I have forwarded a copy of my original contract to my employer and await their response!

 

Do I have a leg to stand on? Or am I chasing the £800+ a year that I stand to lose without a hope in hell?

 

Thanks in advance :)

It never rains but it pours...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The basic position is that they cannot enforce this change on you without your consent. The unfortunate thing is that, if they do, your only real avenue is to resign and claim constructive dismissal.

 

A formal written grievance may be the only way to go - collectively, if there are several employees affected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Becky!

 

I'm sitting tight at the moment. Will email our 'finance manager' in the morning and ask her if she has considered my previous contractual evidence and ask them for a final response on the matter before deciding what to do next.

It never rains but it pours...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that you ask (in writing) for the reasons the variation of contract asking for a written response.

 

I realise that it's kind of obvious that they're simply seeking to save money, but if their written response comes back stating that the main reason is to harmonise terms and conditions of the workforce you would have a potential claim that the detriment is connected to the transfer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent Marie! Thankyou both very much!

 

Just found it disgusting how they went about it...

 

I know in the workplace, a lot of the time we are considered as 'just numbers' and certainly not wanting to blow my own trumpet, I go above and beyond here and seem to be constantly undervalued. Longest serving member of this team now and have voluntarily taken on so many different additional duties to try and justify our positions.

 

Seems the more you do, the less you're thought of.

 

Thanks again for some great advise. I'll keep you updated :) x

It never rains but it pours...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Ok.

 

Sorry I haven't checked back sooner.

 

Latest news...

 

I raised an official grievance against my employer. They took into account everything I said and reinstated the full holiday entitlement.

 

It appears now that they've given the correct amount o notice and have invited myself and my colleague to a consultation meeting tomorrow.

 

I have no idea what to expect at this meeting. The only thing I've been told is the employer can only vary our terms and conditions if we agree to it... Anybody know if this is correct? Anybody been through the same sort of consultation meeting?

 

I'm not nervous, just wish I knew what to expect tomorrow!

It never rains but it pours...

Link to post
Share on other sites

U will be consulted and maybe offered a chance to counter offer a middle ground. However your employer can put the new changes in place, and all u can really do is resign and claim constructive dismissal. Very difficult to win especially if your employer hits out with its reduce holidays or redundancy u will in my opinion lose ur caseJ.

 

You would Also have to resign ASAP after the change otherwise you will begin the process of acceptance by continuing to work, this will give you a better chance of claim, but as I said it will b difficult in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Jimbob. Sounds like we are screwed then, and have to like it or lump it?

 

Resigning isn't an option. I like my job - as much as it seems that we are under valued by the company who pay us (that is all our actual employer does - pay us)

 

Ok, will update this thread after the meeting...

It never rains but it pours...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

An update on this. Ongoing saga...

 

We had our first consultation meeting in June and were told if we could provided contractual evidence from our previous employers then our holiday would be reinstated with no problems. I advised the operations manager that I had wage slips and a copy of my original (hand written and signed) new starter application and he said this would be sufficient! I promptly made copies and provided them to him.

 

We didn't hear anything more after the meeting and assumed that the information provided was enough to reinstate what we've always had....

 

Letter received last week saying that they've been in touch with our old company and there is no evidence to suggest that we were on 28 days x 12 hour shifts.

 

My head is done in with this! The company I work for have paid this entitlement for 3 years!!!

 

We have another consultation meeting this week. Basically saying that our holiday decrease will take effect from September now and that they've given us 16 weeks notice.

 

Anybody know if we should continue fighting? Do we have to accept? Or should we just put this to bed and admit defeat?

 

I'm tired and not very well. The stress of this hanging over me is not something I'm able to deal with at the moment. I can't even find the energy to call ACAS an explain everything again from scratch.

 

Any further advice would be appreciated.

 

Regards

 

BM

It never rains but it pours...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

I'm sorry you haven't had any replies yet. The problem is that not all of us understand the ins and outs of TUPE, myself included.

 

I hope the guys will be along as and when their day jobs permit.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All they've ever said is other staff have complained that myself and my colleague are receiving more holiday than them.

 

The consultation meeting has once again been changed and is now being held on Sunday..

It never rains but it pours...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies. Yes, it was said in writing.

 

I haven't got the letter to hand, but it goes somewhere along the lines of 'after receiving several complaints from other members of staff who work more hours but receive less holiday annual leave at this site has been investigated and in line with gov legislation will be decreased from 28 days to 19.6 days'

It never rains but it pours...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well don't be too impressed by the reference to legislation; because according to the Regulations they are talking about 19.6 days isn't the suggested/recommended amount, it's the absolute minimum paid holiday entitlement they could give you without being in breach of the legislation.

 

Complaints from other staff is not a good enough reason for reducing your holiday entitlement.

Surely, it would have been much more acceptable to the complaining employees if their holiday entitlement was increased.

If they didn't wish too/couldn't afford to increase their holidays they could simply have explained to these employees that they are not responsible for the terms of your contract and that your terms are are protected under TUPE.

 

Your employer could reduce your entitlement (or any of their other employee's) or change any other terms of employment WITH YOUR AGREEMENT/CONSENT.

So, if you don't want your entitlement reduced, don't sign or say anything agreeing to it.

 

They've given you 28 days since you were TUPE'd over 3 years ago.

You proved that you were entitled to 28 days before the transfer in your earlier grievance.

I'm sure that you haven't destroyed the evidence you used in that grievance; so their... 'Letter received last week saying that they've been in touch with our old company and there is no evidence to suggest that we were on 28 days x 12 hour shifts.' ... is ridiculous and irrelevant.

 

During the TUPE process both the transferor and the transferee are required to inform and consult affected employees.

So, have a rummage through your 2009 paper work for further evidence supporting your entitlement to 28 days.

Although the wageslips etc.that you already have is good enough to prove your entitlement, there's no such thing as too much evidence.

 

Are they only seeking to reduce the holiday entitlement of TUPE'd employees?

 

If Yes, they would need to provide an Economic, Technical or Organisational reason in order to lawfully do so.

Other staff complaining doesn't qualify.

 

Assuming that:

a) You don't sign or say anything agreeing to the reduction.

b) They confirm that they have made the reduction in September.

c) They don't dismiss you for refusing to agree. (which would be automatic unfair dismissal)

d) You don't resign. (I can't stress this strongly enough. DO NOT RESIGN!)

 

There is one other avenue you can use to persue this but you would need to be pretty thick skinned in order to follow it.

 

You would need to raise another written grievance immediately after the date that they bring in the change; making it clear that you are continuing to work for them but under protest of the reduction they have unilaterally made to your holiday entitlement.

Assuming that the this grievance fails you would then need to appeal the decision.

If the appeal fails you would then need to submit an employment tribunal claim against your employer no less than 3 months less one day from the date that the change came into effect.

 

If you like I can help you with the written documentation to use throughout the process.

But you need to be aware that even the nicest employers generally don't take too kindly to be sued by their employees and the not so nice ones have been known to suddenly decide that the employee in question has been underperforming or is guilty of some kind of misconduct.

So, you'll need to decide whether you are prepared to risk it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mariefab! Thank you so much for the long post and some great advice. Very much appreciated.

 

I'm currently off work die to anxiety, I'd like to blame this saga, but unfortunately there's been quiet a bit going on in my head of late.

 

I was almost at the stage of throwing this whole thing in and simply accepting that change is going to happen.

 

To me, the whole situation has become ridiculous. We had a consultation meeting in June and my colleague actually recorded the whole meeting on his phones dictaphone. I guess anything Mis quoted by our employer wouldn't really stand as permission wasn't asked for beforehand?

 

We really are not asking for anything additional, simply what we've had since we started. I've provided all information I can find to our new employer to support my holiday entitlement has been 28 days for the last 4 years but they simply will not accept this!

 

For some unbeknown reason our old employer has provided the new company with incorrect information. Nobody works there anymore that was there when we were employed. My colleague who didn't keep his wage slips SAR'ed the old company and they provided wage slips... These showed that he took 28 days in the year that we worked for the old company.

 

I spoke to hr manager a few days ago about my sickness and she told me that the consultation meeting Was cancelled and that she would just arrange a conference call with us to put the new annual leave into place as this has all gone on for too long now!

 

Thank you. Will read through all of your advice again in the morning an arrange to meet with my colleague and further discuss our next move.

 

I understand your closing statement about they could possibly find a way to get rid of us. I've just had my appraisal and scored the second highest marks on site. I can see this changing If I continue the fight lol.

 

Thanks again!

 

BM

It never rains but it pours...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Well. No further consultation meetings. One was arranged but cancelled due to the manager who was due to consult with us being too busy to attend (I guess he was dealing with something much more important than screwing us out of 8 days holiday a year :/ )

 

They told us that the changes would be implemented on September 1st. I've received NO further communication from my employer confirming this so don't even know if they went ahead with the changes to our terms and conditions.

 

Should I write to them again asking if the changes have been put in place or should I let sleeping dogs lie? It's starting to grind me down not actually knowing...

 

Thanks

It never rains but it pours...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, seems I missed an earlier question from mariefab...

 

Are they only seeking to reduce the holiday entitlement of TUPE'd employees?.... Yes, new starters were employed on the company we now work fors terms and conditions (I believe that it is these new guys who are making a song and dance about working alongside us who are on more AL entitlement than they are... I raised the argument at the consultation meeting back in June that (as unfortunate as it is) the new guys knew what they were signing up for when they joined.

 

It's not a happy camp here, a number of people who also transferred with us from the old company have had slight decreases in their entitlement and did NOT raise any grievances about it and had their entitlement lowered whilst mine and my colleagues were reinstated whilst the grievance and consultation period happened...

 

A few of them now have come forward with contractual evidence and the company are refusing to do anything about it saying that they're only listening to mine and my colleagues complaint because we objected in the timescale.

It never rains but it pours...

Link to post
Share on other sites

write back and say you do not accept the changes as holidays were a contractual par of your contract pre-TUPE, should be honoured post TUPE, and you do not agree with the change following consultation

 

Keep a copy.

 

Expect them to become more vindictive and look to get you out on eg attendance or performance. So one for the strong stomached.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

write back and say you do not accept the changes as holidays were a contractual par of your contract pre-TUPE, should be honoured post TUPE, and you do not agree with the change following consultation

 

Keep a copy.

 

Expect them to become more vindictive and look to get you out on eg attendance or performance. So one for the strong stomached.

 

Good advice, and it's also worth making clear that you're "working under protest". If you don't make your objections clear, you will be deemed to have accepted the breach of contract.

 

I would also suggest that the TUPEd employees find a union to negotiate on their behalf. There are unions who take on numerous employees in an existing dispute if they are receiving high enough subscription fees!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi both, thank you for your replies.

 

The last letter we received from our employee stated that they were looking to introduce the changes from the 1st September AFTER a consultation with our operations manager... This consultation hasn't happened.

 

We've been on a stupid and pointless journey with this all. Raised grievances and are currently working under protest (not covering overtime - they're kinda playing us by getting guys in who don't know the site and are as much use as chocolate teapots) we've shouted out the reasons why we aren't covering the over time and just get told that it's our team mates who are suffering and not the company - which to an extent, is true, but it's the only way we can make our little protest at this unfair treatment.

 

Does anybody think it's a good idea to write to HR to see what's going on? See if the changes have been made without our acceptance? We were promised a consultation before such changes were made. I don't expect much from this company if I'm honest, but want to do everything by the book in case it does end up in me having to take them to an ET.

It never rains but it pours...

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Your employer wished to unilaterally reduce your holiday entitlement.

 

You've proved your contractual entitlement to 28 days and presented a grievance.

You need to write to HR outlining the holiday issue shenanigans to date and asking for written confirmation of employer's current position regarding your annual holiday entitlement.

I suggest that you state that you would appreciate receiving a written response by 30th September.

 

2. Refusing to work overtime.

 

Why are you doing this?

It's a rare contract of employment that doesn't have a clause saying that some overtime may be required according to business needs.

It's possible you could be breaching your contract by refusing.

 

It isn't appropriate to refuse to do overtime in protest of the reduction in holiday entitlement.

1 and 2 have nothing to do with each other.

Refusing to do overtime to demonstrate your annoyance about the holiday issue is a mistake.

All it shows is that you are just as happy to potentially breach your contract as your employer is.

You could well be handing your employer a weapon to use against you.

 

If your employer confirms that they have decided to unilaterally reduce your entitlement from 1st September your next step would be to present another grievance.

You would state in your grievance that you are continuing to work under protest until the holiday issue is resolved.

This simply means that you will carry on working as normal.

The only thing you're protesting about is the holiday reduction.

 

If you want some help with the grievance, let us know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mariefab, thank you once again. Your advice is fantastic.

 

Ok, this refusing to work overtime "protest", I suppose then, fortunately for me, I haven't been asked to work any of these additional shifts recently. In the past I've always been the one to jump at the chance to earn an extra few ££££'s. It was a colleague that suggested that he wouldn't be working any more overtime shifts as our rest days are now even more precious. (nobody has asked me to cover any shifts instead the open duties have been covered by outsiders)

 

Thank you for your advice on that point though, I suppose now in the event of a request to work additional shifts I'll choose my answer more carefully lol.

 

I shall write a letter over the weekend requesting the information as per your advice. Just to confirm, I haven't accepted these proposed changes and I shall just be requesting an answer now as to what's happening with this all? And if my holiday entitlement has been changed?

 

I really can't thank you all enough for your advice and support.

 

I will undoubtedly need some assistance with a further grievance if the reply comes back that they have deducted these days from us. I will keep you updated.

 

Kind Regards

 

BM

It never rains but it pours...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I've emailed my company.

 

They've basically confirmed that the new entitlement is now in place... 19.6 days. No written confirmation and certainly No agreeance on my behalf.

 

They're trying to say that the terms and conditions have been changed correctly now because this whole fiasco has took 16 weeks (correct notice period because I've been employed for 4 years!!)

It never rains but it pours...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...