Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4475 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Can some one please help me with newlyn bailiff

 

I received a letter from them to say they will be calling at my house from 6am to 9pm tomorrow.

 

I separated from my husband 3 years ago and with three children and working part time it has been difficult to keep up with my council tax.

 

I had an arrangement with the council but due to financial hardship did not keep it up as i agreed to pay more than i can afford.

 

My ex said he will help me and between the 2 of us we can pay £75 a month.

 

I know i owe about £5000 but I am willing to pay and clear it off as soon as I can.

 

Can you please help me how to go about it to get them to accept my payments or the council to take back so I can continue to pay them.

 

I am also disabled and i am scared that they will take my mobility car as i really depend on it to take me to work

as i work 15 miles away from home and also to pick kids up from school to save me paying childcare.

 

Please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are classed as vulnerable and should not be having bailiffs visiting,

there are people who will advise you as to how to proceed but dont panic.

 

They cant take mobility car, they cant enter your house (unless you leave a door open or window so keep them locked)

you dont have to speak to them,

 

please wait until people who can advise you about vulnerable status have replied.

 

Just one thing when you do get it back to council please keep up payments and only offer what you can afford, be realistic.

 

I highly suspect that Newlyns wont be attending it is more to frighten you into ringing them.

 

But if they do turn up remember you dont have to talk to them,

in fact I would advise not to they are highly skilled in threats and getting you into payment plans you cant afford.

 

So just wait for advice over vulnerable status.

I know my rights Mr DCA I'm with the CAG......hello hello where you gone Mr DCA8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Padja just hope that someone can help as I will definately keep up payments as i do not want to go through this situation again especially with 3 kids at home.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vulnerable situations

.

Enforcement agents/agencies and creditors must recognise that they each have a role in ensuring that

the vulnerable and socially excluded are protected and that the recovery process includes procedures

agreed between the agent/agency and creditor about how such situations should be dealt with.

The appropriate use of discretion is essential in every case and no amount of guidance could cover every situation,

therefore the agent has a duty to contact the creditor and report the circumstances in situations where there is evidence of a potential cause for concern.

If necessary, the enforcement agent will advise the creditor if further action is appropriate.

The exercise of appropriate discretion is needed,

not only to protect the debtor, but also the enforcement agent who should avoid taking action which could lead to accusations of inappropriate behaviour.

.

Enforcement agents must withdraw from domestic premises if the only person present is, or appears to be, under the age of 18; they can ask when the debtor will be home - if appropriate. .

Enforcement agents must withdraw without making enquiries if the only persons present are children who appear to be under the age of 12.

.

Wherever possible, enforcement agents should have arrangements in place for rapidly accessing translation services when these are needed,

and provide on request information in large print or in Braille for debtors with impaired sight.

 

.

Those who might be potentially vulnerable include:

the elderly; .

people with a disability; .

the seriously ill; .

the recently bereaved; .

single parent families; .

pregnant women; .

unemployed people; and, .

those who have obvious difficulty in understanding, speaking or reading English.

this applies to the whole HOUSEHOLD 'a' vunerable person resides there.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I write to bailiff or the council about my situation although the council will try and tell me it has nothing to do with them and to contact the bailiff. Can someone please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

To claim "vulnerability" you do need to provide proof you are eligible, this should be sent to both Bailiffs & Council. I assume if you have a Motabiltity vehicle you claim DLA? The car should be safe unless you get a belligerent Bailiff who may try to seize it to make life difficult, but the giveaway for him is that the taxation class will say Disabled when he looks at the Road Fund Licence - may I suggest you leave your Blue Badge clearly on display on the dashboard.

 

May I ask the ages of your children? Being a single parent is also another consideration for vulnerability even more so if the children are young. Do you claim Single Person Discount for your Council Tax?

 

If you have £5k outstanding then I assume this is something that has gone on for a few years. On Monday you need to speak to someone at the Council and ask the following questions:

1 - how many Liability Orders they have against you

2 - the dates they were obtained

3 - the addresses they were for

4 - the period of time each covers

5 - how much each one was for

6 - how much is still outstanding

7 - the dates they were passed on for enforcement

 

Please also be aware that for any years where your OH was resident with you he will also be liable and the Bailiff may attend at his address. Regardless of circumstances you must start to make payments ASAP as non-payment can result in a custodial sentence and if you have not paid for a length of time this could be seen as wilful refusal to pay. I would also urge you to contact your local Councillor(s) over the weekend to help on your behalf.

 

You can start to make payments direct to the Council via online banking, Council website or automated phone. You do not have to have their permission to do so or that of the Bailiff. Providing you deny the Bailiff access to your home or otherwise prevent him seizing goods outside you can limit the fees he will charge to a maximum of £42-50.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not claiming sng person council tax and my kids are 8,11.15 yrs old. I am going to try and draft a letter to the bailiff offering them £75 a month (including an income and expenditure form) and also let them know i am disabled sending copy of my DLA award letter.

 

Hopefully that will appeal to their better nature and they will accept my offer of payment and not keep including extra fees to drag it on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes should have been sorted ages ago.

 

DONT ever pay bailiffs

 

if you can pay

do it direct to the council via your internet banking site

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Council have discretion to backdate any claim. Best to tell them you were not aware until all this business of unpaid CT arose - more important to get your Councillor involved as he can help do this for you, in my view Councillors are contactable 7 days per week up to 9pm. The Council if they accept this may put the Bailiff on hold until new totals can be established - you have nothing to lose and everything to gain by asking.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please note that the Bailiff exists by his threats and intimidation. If he calls he will tell you that you have to let him as he has a Court Order - he doesn't it's a Liability Order. He may threaten to come back with the Police or a locksmith and force entry whilst you are out - again another threat which he cannot carry out. He will pretend to ring others as he will tell you he is going to remove all your worldly possessions - he has to gain entry first and providing you deny him he is powerless.

 

He may see you as an easy target - lone female with children. He will shout and stamp his feet and no doubt spit his dummy out. In my view bullies get all they deserve so you will have to remain strong and bark back at him. If you ignore him he will eventually go away once he realises he is getting nowhere.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

... I am going to try and draft a letter to the bailiff offering them £75 a month ...

 

Hi dayo, please do not do this. Please do not offer the bailiff repayment terms, you will only be making a rod for your own back I assure you. You have plenty of good advice here, do follow it.

You are in a vulnerable situation and the council has a duty to take the case back inhouse and it is to them you must negotiate an offer of payment that is sustainable bearing in mind the new bills are about to hit your doormat.

Write to the council Head of Revenues, explain why you feel you are vulnerable - single Mother, young children, disabled, on DLA and motability etc - and enclose copies of any evidence ie Doctors letters, consultants letters, Prescriptions if they have many items on them, DLA confirmation, etc. THEN copy that to the bailiff firm as a secondary decision. Email if you prefer but follow up with hard copies sent by signed for.

IF the council turn down your request for the return of the case then you have very good grounds to make a Formal Complaint to the council CEO...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good advice so far, DO NOT allow the bailiff in, stress the vulnerability, as if you make the arrangement with bailiffs they will do their utmost to engineer a default so they can issue more threats and add more fees. If he turns up film him even with a mobile phone, and pay the council direct. speak to him through the letterbox, or an upstairs window.

Do as plodderrtom says regarding the car, as if he seizes it the seizure and levy on it will be invalid anyway, he may claim he can take it, but he would be in serious trouble if he did.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...