Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wrong Meter Reading given by last owner - Attention of EON Rep


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4131 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I moved into a house in Dec. I rang utility companies and gave gas and elec and water meter readings. I have just had a £900 elec bill which is showing an incorrect start reading. I gave them 28000 and they had it on their records as 21000. The gas is correct (same supplier) but they refuse to accept I posted 28000 with them and demand I pay. I only live in the house 3 days a week, and it only has 2 rooms, and if you work out the bill from the reading I have them it is what I would expect, but they keep saying I have to pay. What can I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi hildaw

 

Welcome to CAG

 

What's the name of the Utility Company? Clearly if the meter reads 28000 and thats the info you've given them, even if you've given them the wrong info the meter reads 28000, that should be the end of the matter. I'd go as far as to say you've given them the right info, but they have altered it to generate further profits for themselves. I recently changed supplier, I gave them electricty readings over the phone, I gave them the same readings online, the meter reader came around gave them the same meter reading, you guessed when I got the bill the electricty bill the reading was slightly higher. The utility companies thrive on creating mistakes to take advantage of consumers.

Have a read of number 16/17 in my signature. Communicate with them via letter, send letters Recorded, state the Account is in Dispute.

 

Some tips:- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1242161/How--write-letter-complaint.html

 

16) UTILITY BACKBILLING CLICK HERE

17) OFGEM - COMPLAINTS CLICK HERE

 

Thread has been moved to the correct forum.

 

Let us know what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

When I took over the property the supplier was Eon. I changed to Scottish Power and have no problem with them, they took my readings and my first bill was fine and in line with what I expected.

Eon however, say the reading of 21000 came from the previous owner. There closing bill is £900

This cannot be the case, he bought the property, never lived in it, but did it up to sell on. I t has been on the market for 12 months until I came along, because the first buyer pulled out after 6 months of procrastinating. Meanwhile the property was not lived in. There was no supply used in the property during this time, except for the occasional elec light when viewers visited.

EON say I must take it up through my solicitor and the previous owner, but why should I.

I always thought they should take the reading that the new occupier gives, as the previous occupier could say anything to get a rebate even?? Whereas my usage would soon show if I had been fibbing.

Thing is, what do I do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi hidlaw

 

Well, EON need to chase the previous occupant for the monies owed, 21000-28000, you quite rightly provided the 28000 reading to Scottish Power.

As far as I can see this is an issue between EON and the previous Occupant.

There is a EON rep on this site who can look into the matter :-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/member.php?323098-E.ON-Company-Rep-Malc#

 

I've edited the title, let us know what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi hildaw

 

Must admit, not quite sure from what you've posted, but first impressions suggest this does sound like a third party dispute.

 

You say, the reading of 21000 was provided by the previous owner when responsibility changed hands. If this fell in line with the pattern of usage on the old account then there would have been no reason to question this reading. Consequently, this account will have been closed to this reading and a final bill sent to the previous owner.

 

This reading will then have been used to start your account.

 

Changing your starting reading will have implications for the closing reading used for the former owner. Hence, I suspect a third party dispute.

 

This is not to say you can't ask us to re-check the readings used.

 

Sorry I can't offer anything more positive at this stage hildaw.

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

The previous occupant had an account with Eon, the last reading Eon received from the previous occupant was 21000, the previous occupant didn't give Eon the closing reading when they left which was 28000, but I suspect that Eon would have got that information from Scottish Power to carry out the 'switch'. The new occupant has given Scottish Power the opening reading of 28000 and received the correct bill for their usage. So I still see this as a Eon/previous occupant issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi hildaw

 

I must fully agree with rebel11 but could you just clarify a few thing please.

 

1. The Reading of 21000 provided to EON by the previous was given to them on which date and was it a "Final Meter Reading"?

2. The Start Reading of 28000 provided by you the New Owner of the Property to New Supplier was on which date?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid this isn't quite the way I see it guys.

 

Could be wrong but I'm interpreting the OP's situation as an issue with the start reading for the account once they had taken over responsibility for the property. I don't see it as an issue with the reading at the time the supply changed hands.

 

The way I see it, the OP took over on x date and believes the reading for this day should be 28000. However, we have a reading from the previous owner for the same day of 21000 which we've closed the old account to.

 

As it takes several weeks for a change of supplier to go through, there will be another later reading which the new supplier will use to open their account to. This, I suspect, will be in excess of 28000 so will not appear out of line.

 

Must admit, from the info available, I'm not sure and am quite happy to be proved wrong. However, the OP did say in their first post the matter related to an incorrect start reading and this is what I've been going on.

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid this isn't quite the way I see it guys.

 

Could be wrong but I'm interpreting the OP's situation as an issue with the start reading for the account once they had taken over responsibility for the property. I don't see it as an issue with the reading at the time the supply changed hands.

 

The way I see it, the OP took over on x date and believes the reading for this day should be 28000. However, we have a reading from the previous owner for the same day of 21000 which we've closed the old account to.

 

As it takes several weeks for a change of supplier to go through, there will be another later reading which the new supplier will use to open their account to. This, I suspect, will be in excess of 28000 so will not appear out of line.

 

Must admit, from the info available, I'm not sure and am quite happy to be proved wrong. However, the OP did say in their first post the matter related to an incorrect start reading and this is what I've been going on.

 

Malc

 

I gave the reading on 21 December. EON claim they got the meter reading from previous owner on same date. Don't see how, he wasn't there to take it. Either way this is a tiny 2 up 2 down house. I work nights 4 days a week. How can anyone suggest I have used £900 worth of elec in that time.. House had been empty for 6 months prior to my purchase as previous owner had moved out and his sale fell through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Something I omitted to say in my earlier posts, my supply was taken over by the new energy company on 21st January, exactly one month after I moved into the property. I have spoken at length today with EON, and they absolutely maintain that the bill is my responsibility, they are going to escalate it, but still consider I have to pay. How is it possible that they are going by a previous owners readings, who left the property empty for months and not mine as the new owner? When I gave them my readings they accept that the gas reading concurred, but say they have spoken to the previous owner who assures them the readings he gave them were correct. If my reading did not stack up with his, why didn't they come out immediately and check? I don't understand why this has come to my door.

My Mom spoke to her solicitor today and he said bounce it straight back to EON they havnt got a leg to stand on, but I find this whole thing is giving me sleepless nights, and the EON people speak as if they don't intend to let go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes 21000 was final reading, so they say, and my reading of 28000 was a new owner start reading. We don't seem to be in dispute over the gas. I was moved to the new supplier on 21st Jan, one month after moving in, so couldn't possible have used £900 in one month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why, when I phoned in my start reading, if it didn't correspond to what they had as the closing reading, didn't they query it by checking the meter? Seems simple to me. As the property had been empty for 6 months prior, don't see how they could have a 'pattern of usage' And, given I moved from EON one month after moving in, its outrageous too suggest I have used £900. Isn't it obvious to them what has happened her, why are they chasing me for someone else's debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send a letter telling them your disputing the account, send a SAR to them requesting all the data on the account, I take it that Scottish Power started your account with 28,000. As you say no problem with the gas reading. They're basically saying you've used £27 worth of electricity each week. The only way you are going to resolve this is by getting the info. I bet the previous occupant has low useage recorded for a period or two.

 

Something I omitted to say in my earlier posts, my supply was taken over by the new energy company on 21st January, exactly one month after I moved into the property. I have spoken at length today with EON, and they absolutely maintain that the bill is my responsibility, they are going to escalate it, but still consider I have to pay. How is it possible that they are going by a previous owners readings, who left the property empty for months and not mine as the new owner? When I gave them my readings they accept that the gas reading concurred, but say they have spoken to the previous owner who assures them the readings he gave them were correct. If my reading did not stack up with his, why didn't they come out immediately and check? I don't understand why this has come to my door.

My Mom spoke to her solicitor today and he said bounce it straight back to EON they havnt got a leg to stand on, but I find this whole thing is giving me sleepless nights, and the EON people speak as if they don't intend to let go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Fully argee with rebel11 on this dispute the account.

 

I would also ask for a copy of their policy/procedure regarding meter readings and

 

under exactly what legislation or act of parliment states the previous owners reading that is phoned in to their company is accurate without actually being taken by a qualified meter reader.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

I have a not unrelated problem with this company. Gas readings are ok but the previous owner and meter reader have been entering the electricity reading incorrectly. The meter is a Siemens digital meter which displays 6 digits. If the first digit is zero, then only the last five are displayed with no leading zero. Both the owner and Meter reader have been entering the five digits on show and not the first four preceded by a zero. The upshot is that the previous owner has been paying ten times the true amount!. For a house with GAS central heating and GAS fires, the owner was paying in excess of £130 per month for lighting, fridge, electric cooker and TV. She did not realise she was being overcharged. I am now in a battle with them over this. It will be interesting to see if they accept the mistake and refund the thousands of pounds owed to the previous owner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Aelfred

 

In situations like these, where there's a dispute over the meter reading format, it's best to arrange a visit. This will be to check the technical details of the meter to make sure we have it set up correctly on your account. There's no charge for this type of visit.

 

If we've billed incorrectly in the past, we'll re-bill to the right configuration. Should this result in a credit balance, we'll be happy to refund this.

 

To arrange a visit please ask the advisor looking after your query.

 

Hope this helps point you in the right direction. Give me a shout if you need any more advice as happy to help.

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...