Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC Business LOan CCJ and Marstons Bailiffs


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4252 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you for attachments and advice, very much appreciated.

Regarding the SAR both the judge and Wragge&Co just pass it off as not important. HSBC have offered me (via the FOB) £300 compensation for the way they have handled our request, however, they have still failed to supply me with the relevant documents.

When I brought this to the judges attention he just agreed with Wragge&Co that all I needed was the bank statements for the 2 accounts that they are chasing me for. His direction was that HSBC were to provide me with these statements. Amazingly these statements arrived the very next morning from Wragge&Co!!!

I have now until the 9th May to file and serve a fully pleaded and particularised defence compliant with CPR 1998.

My case has been listed for an allocation hearing/CMC on the 28th June 2012.

I just think that they are trying to manipulate me away from asking and receiving information regarding the other accounts. They were asking the judge for quick decisions when we were in front of him a couple of weeks ago, trying to force the issue.

We just don't know exactly how to attack this now?

Any ideas please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi

We are back in court tomorrow and we still have not received all of the documents that we have requested (via SAR).

They are asking the judge to strike out my defence, to also grant a money order and a repossession order.

I do admit that I owe some of the money, but not all. Can anyone advise me on how to handle this please?

My mortgage is with UCB Homes (Nationwide) and I have very little equity in the house, if any.

Are HSBC likely to get a repossession order? If so and my house is sold am I not correct in thinking that the money will go to my lender, UCB Homes and NOT HSBC ?

Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated.

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

IF, and only IF a repossession order was granted then your mortgage and and secured debts would be repaid before any credit card debts.

 

If you disagree with the value of the claim they are demanding - you should have already pointed out what amount you disagree with.

 

Ok, it looks like this is a secured loan with HSBC, in which case they will be next on the list AFTER your mortgage lender.

 

So it might not be in their interests to apply for a repossession.

 

Is the mortgage in joint names - in which case, I think they will only be able to apply for a restriction on your half of the property. Do you have a small family or is anyone classed as vulnerable/disabled ?

 

IF HSBC win their claim, then you should ask if it is possible for an instalment order to be made.

 

You should take with you an Income & Expenditure form, showing how much you can afford to repay each month. I have attached one for you below.

 

Ellens Budget Sheet.xls

Edited by citizenB

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice.

Yes it's a secured business loan in joint names from HSBC. I cannot quote an exact amount of money that I agree on because they will not provide me with statements etc.

We had incurred excessive charges due to our business bank manager working outside of banking hours i.e. 7am (we only found this out after extensive investigations), he checking what was due to go out of our account that day and then he would refuse to honour the checks a direct debits. Some days this would also include all our staffs wages that were due to be paid by bacs.

But he chose to ignore that fact that at 9am on these days our invoice financing credits would be showing, therefore our account had sufficient funds to honour our payments etc.

He has since been dismissed from the bank and we cannot get any info inc statements to prove this was happening. Were banging our heads against a brick wall!!!

This is what we have been fighting all this time inc issuing SAR's etc, everything has been completely ignored. Now were back in court!

What can we do? any ideas please !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice.

Yes it's a secured business loan in joint names from HSBClink3.gif. I cannot quote an exact amount of money that I agree on because they will not provide me with statements etc.

We had incurred excessive charges due to our business bank manager working outside of banking hours i.e. 7am (we only found this out after extensive investigations), he checking what was due to go out of our account that day and then he would refuse to honour the checks a direct debits. Some days this would also include all our staffs wages that were due to be paid by bacs.

But he chose to ignore that fact that at 9am on these days our invoice financing credits would be showing, therefore our account had sufficient funds to honour our payments etc.

He has since been dismissedlink3.gif from the bank and we cannot get any info inc statements to prove this was happening. Were banging our heads against a brick wall!!!

This is what we have been fighting all this time inc issuing SARlink3.gif's etc, everything has been completely ignored. Now were back in court!

What can we do? any ideas please !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

All I can do is flag your thread for assistance, this is way outside my knowledge base.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I fear that someone may not visit your thread in good time.

 

I suggest all you can do is take a copy of all the paperwork you have - along with your defence and witness statements, which you would have already submitted to the court etc.. Your income & Expenditure form showing how much you can afford to pay a month.

 

You need to impress upon the court that you have been denied access to documents that would help your case , in particular statemetns that would prove they are not entitled to the amount they are claiming.

 

I do wish you all the very best and I am sorry that I am unable to help any further.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi Determined 1, I have also been and still am a victim of Marston Groug and HSBC Factoring. My circumstances are pretty much the same as yours!!! its strange how my figure was also £17K? I am speaking to a solicitor at the moment who is dealing with this. His name is Milton and he hopefully will be asking the courts to set the order aside due to the fact that HSBC fatoring went to court with out my knowledge!!!! The so called amount due was supposed to have been chased for which i asked for evidence, the reply i got was that they could not supply any information because after 3 years the account is closed and information destroyed. I then asked for the evidence that was produced in court, they informed me that it was just a copy of the agreement and a cluse breakdown. Marstons will add interest on!!! My payment of £17K is now £20K, i pay £100.00 a month and have done for the last 3 years but the amount seems to go up instead of down, I will of course let you know how i get on over the next few weeks with the order.

 

Regards

Gina g

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to HSBC Business LOan CCJ and Marstons Bailiffs
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...