Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks DX , true I was reading it as my own licence when I can now see it is the VED thanks for the clarification. As for the payments that does make sense and I will give them a call today. I have to watch the date as I have 21 days from the 29th May to respond to plea of guilty or not.
    • This is the latest response from IDR. I know exactly what has happened - I left Qatar in 2006 leaving behind card debt of QAR13,000 (unintentionally, I thought it was paid off). When I visited Qatar for a weekend in 2012, I was blocked from leaving the country - ended up having to go to the Court, met with the bank and negitiated a settlement  - they wanted about QAR90,000 in total and supposedly agreed on QAR40,000 to settle completely. Unfortunately, I only have a pay-in receipt for that and no confirmation the whole debt was settled: I was so focussed on getting the exit ban lifted. Anyway, I left and I have visited Qatar since then with no issue. My concern is that the statute of limitations  will run from 2012, rather than 2006. Should I continue to ignore or explain to IDR that I don't agree there is an exisiting debt? IDR 10062024 redacted.pdf
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • as with some of your threads in the past. you are not reading things carefully and understanding things properly by going off on assumptions. not sure where you are getting your driving licence is being revoked from? nowhere do they use that word. nothing to do with it. vehicle excise licence. (Road Tax), a VEL cannot be revoked only voided. you are also wrong and nowhere does the DVLA state they cancelled the DD.  the court summons clearly states in the DVLA statement: it was your cancelling/reclaim of the DD on 15-02-2024 that caused this, NOTHING to do with the DVLA, they did not revoke the VEL. as they received no payment, on 02.05.2024 the VEL was Voided. it appears you have got the new DD setup wrong to the wrong DVLA account/ref number/VEL number. they have not received the payments to the correct VEL. i would be ringing DVLA and finding out where these payments are on their system and get them attributed to the correct VEL. that should solve the problem.
    • Its UK customers must now pay £1.99 to return clothes, with the cost deducted from their refund.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unicom court proceedings


Biglgh
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4106 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm looking for some advice,

 

I recently sold my business, in which I had Unicom supply my telephone and broadband service, I sold the pub with 12 months remaining of the contract, at the time I asked them too cancell the contracts. They new owners took out new contracts, with them. I'm now being asked to pay more than my cancelation charge due too loss of my contract, but the have had a replacement contract,

 

Can they take money from two contract on one property?

 

Thank for your help in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

you say court proceedings - i bet it says may, might, should could not WILL

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check your credit file (DX's sig has some links) If there is nothing adverse on there, I don't think they can do anything against you.

 

Regarding ending a contract early, they're on shaky ground anyway. The maximum they can charge for a breach of contract is their "reasonable out of pocket expenses". The remainder of the contract is dubious, any extra is a definite no-no.

 

Also, how long was the minimum term of the contract? Ofcom banned 3 year contracts. There is no way they'd consider any "court action" if you were contracted for that length of time.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Their are 2 valid ways of dealing with this.

 

1st way. ANY debt collection activity just write and tell them you dispute the legality of the contract, as it is unfair. If they want to prove its fairness you welcome the opportunity to see them in court.

 

2nd way ignore them, they will eventually go away. Let them rack up a phone bill trying to phone you, waste stamps writing to you. Providing this doesn't harm your credit rating, (again get your £2 credit report from DX's signature) there is no more they can do, except threaten more debt collection activity.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi biglgh,

I too came out of a pub in March this year after 2 and half years of a 3 year contract with unicom! I have a £344 termination charge with unicom and after emails and letters from them and Universal debt services I appear to be at a stale mate with them. Offered them 50p a month as they are at the bottom of the pile of debt I came out of the pub with but they have refused saying they will take me to court. Just wondered where you are at with them now? The last guy I spoke to this week said they wont deal with me in writing only phone and I insisted I will only deal in writing. Complete bully boys, very aggressive!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi AD

Check the good advice on this link that deals with Unicom's collection strategies

[edit] - please do not publicise fee paying dmp co's - dx siteteam

Edited by dx100uk
please do not publicise fee paying dmp co's - dx siteteam
Link to post
Share on other sites

Unicom and UDS are the same company.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi there i am in the very same boat after the collapse of my pub in April 2012.

 

I had a contract with Unicom which started in June 2011 and was told by the adviser that if anything was to go wrong with my business

it would not be a problem in canceling my contract so i was happy to take them up on there offer.

 

As soon as my pub went under i contacted Unicom and now have a bill for £977.16 and rising with interest every month.

 

This morning the 14th of March 2013 i have the third threatening letter of Court proceedings against me

With threats of Bailiffs attending my home to remove goods etc.

 

I gave up two months ago talking to these IDIOTS on the phone because they are so aggressive.

 

I wrote them a letter last month with offer of a monthly fee but no response only phoning me up to 3 times everyday and leaving messages.

 

I have now today sent them a letter Threatening them of Harassment and to only contact me by letter.

 

This company are nothing but bully's and no its my turn to get nasty. Watch this space. :mad2::mad2:

 

Hi biglgh,

I too came out of a pub in March this year after 2 and half years of a 3 year contract with unicom! I have a £344 termination charge with unicom and after emails and letters from them and Universal debt services I appear to be at a stale mate with them. Offered them 50p a month as they are at the bottom of the pile of debt I came out of the pub with but they have refused saying they will take me to court. Just wondered where you are at with them now? The last guy I spoke to this week said they wont deal with me in writing only phone and I insisted I will only deal in writing. Complete bully boys, very aggressive!

Link to post
Share on other sites

no bailiffs can do anything

its not been to court yet.

 

dca's are NOT BAIIFFS

and have no such legal powers

 

STOP using the phone too.

 

pers i'd totally ignore them.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i know that its all to frighten you and many people fall for it. i have told them the only way i will communicate with them now is by letter and they dont like it because its all proof of what they are doing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

A little known avenue to complain about companies who are acting fraudulently, or against the public interest is the Companies Investigation Branch of the Insolvency Service. I have copied and pasted below the following 2 paragraphs from their web site.

 

The Insolvency Service does not only investigate the affairs of companies that are subject to insolvency proceedings. It can also investigate companies that are actively trading, or which have ceased trading without entering into insolvency proceedings, using powers of investigation under the Companies Acts. There must be reasonable grounds to suspect fraud, serious misconduct, material wrong-doing or significant irregularity in a company's affairs for us to investigate.

 

Investigations are fact finding in nature. They are not criminal investigations, although they may address conduct which could amount to criminal behaviour. Our approach is to take a proportionate and realistic view of issues brought to our attention, and to investigate aspects of corporate behaviour which might harm both the business community and the public generally. With this in mind we wish to know about the activities of any company which appears to be causing significant harm to consumers, trade suppliers, service providers, investors etc., who have had dealings with it. Also where there is any strong indication of serious misconduct in the management or affairs of a company.

 

If you feel that Unicom are being overly aggressive with their debt collection strategies, it might be worth contacting the Investigation Branch of the IS for advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...